Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
4 ) a current copy of their current credit report 1
4 ) Abuse of the system- to prevent and hinder me 1
4 ) identify the original creditor 1
4 ) They are denying access to the Club in the airport 1
4 ) XXXX XXXX 1
4 and 6 of this process 1
4 days to deny my modification. This is deception. PHH has no reason to deny my modification while the property has almost 45 % equity. 1
4 dogs 4
4 hard inquiries on my credit. I have 3 companies ( Equifax 1
4 hours ahead of XXXX XXXX XXXX. 1
4 minutes 1
4 months ago I receive message that XXXX will be reporting as XXXX credit 2
4 months ago I receive message that XXXX will be reporting as XXXXXXXX XXXX now XXXX is responding that they don't control XXXX accounts. Major thing is they sold the company without getting consumers authorization 1
4 RE Services llc 1
4 separate times. However 1
4 Star Resolution LLC (Closed) 14
4 were reversed out of customer service '' for XX/XX/XXXX 1
4-406. 1
4. Delete this account from all credit bureaus if any aspect of the record can not be fully verified and validated. 1
4. Proof of chain of custody ( documentation showing legal transfer or assignment of the debt from the original creditor to your agency ) 1
4. provide us with notice to increase the rate from zero ( 0 % ) to 25.99 % 1
4. Section 623 ( 15 U.S.C. $ 1681s-2 ) - Responsibilities of information Providers accurey and authorization tins with both the crod t bureau and the information orchidors 5. Section 605A ( 15 U.S.C. $ 1681c-1 ) - Protection Against Identity Theft This orovision mandates the removal of unauthorized inauiries that could cotentially relate to identity that. I raunst the deletion of thase inquiries under this motection,,EQUIFAX 1
4. The full chain of title including purchase or assignment agreements showing legal transfer of the debt to the current owner 3
4. THHAT 1
4.4 1
40 4
40 Years of Experience with the Fair Credit Reporting Act : An FTC Staff Report with Summary of Interpretations ( XXXX. XXXX ) 2
40-year term and higher interest rate ) to fix a servicer-caused escrow error.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING 1
400 dollars to make the rental process Legal.Since my house is a beautiful house. so you should have no problem with that as it is part of the move in cost. Making it a total of {$2600.00} as the move in cost 1
4000.1 ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 1
401 ( k ) s 1
401K 1
404 1
41 ( d ) ( 1 ) -1. ( emphasis added ). A mere statement that a loan modification option is denied based on an investor requirement 1
410 P.2d 930 1
412 ( f ) ( 1 ) 1
417 N.E.2d 597 ( Mun. Ct. 1980 ). 1
42 days earlier. 1
42 months later 1
42 U.S.C. 12132 ) ) Attorney-in-Fact / Executor / Private Fiduciary / Ecclesiastical Trustee XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Re : IMMEDIATE CREDIT DENIAL RECONSIDERATION RETALIATORY ESTATE CREDIT THEFT & FIDUCIARY REMOVAL Federal Civil Case No. : XXXX ( XXXX XXXX ) 1
42 U.S.C. 12182 ) 1
42 U.S.C. 14043e11 2. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act ( ECOA ) 1
424-B5 prospectus 1
42nd Congress Stat. 13-15 shown as code at 42 USC 1983 for Actions under Color of Authority or Fraudulent and or illegal transactions. I request the oaths of office for the above listed defendants 1
43 Wis 2d 166. 1
43 Wis 2d 166. False or misleading. I suffered damages as a result of XXXX 1
43 Wis 2d 166.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,FL,33803,,Consent provided,Web,2023-12-29,Closed with non-monetary relief,Yes,N/A,8073996 1
43 Wis 2d 166.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,FL,XXXXX,,Consent provided,Web,2023-12-22,Closed with non-monetary relief,Yes,N/A,8039734 1
43 Wis 2d 166.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,NRA Group 1
43 Wis 2d 166.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.