Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
2015 call 1
2015 due to a stop payment placed on this check .... funds in the amount of {$990.00} 1
2015 had requested CFPB for an extension of resolution to XXXX XXXX 1
2015 I received a call from my Relationship Manager 1
2015 I sent a request for validation to Commonwealth Financial Systems requesting for validation. XXXX has passed and I have not received any communication from the collection agency regarding my claim since I discovered the collection items on my credit report and did not receive any initial notices from them regarding any debt being owed. On XXXX XXXX 1
2015 if I had n't heard from him sooner. I called him on XXXX XXXX 1
2015 letter by SunTrust turning down my credit 1
2015 mailed,Company chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,FL,33169,,Consent provided,Web,2015-11-21,Closed with non-monetary relief,Yes,No,1666887 1
2015 Nelson v. Experian 2
2015 no later than XXXX XXXX 1
2015 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
2015 you were abusive and/or threatening during the conversation. Based on this 1
2015. 4
2015. ( attached ). 1
2015. After multiple calls 1
2015. Checking the Freedom Mortgage Corporation website on XXXX XXXX 1
2015. Final payment of the overdue amount of {$48.00} was received on XXXX XXXX 1
2015. I left store without purchase. Today XXXX/XXXX/15 1
2015. I said how could this be since SunTrust notified me my credit was bad 1
2015. I then received a call from XXXX XXXX stating that he spoke to his compliance department and he was within his right to refer my loan to foreclosure at 90 days. I inquired if/what my account had accrued legal fees and the name of the firm. I was told he would get the figures for legal costs and fees and I was referred to XXXX. Nothing has been addressed about no offer of Loss Mitigation or the fact that I proved that I had a retention bonus of {$11000.00} before my loan would be 120 days past due. In no fashion has Nationstar tried to work with me. This is the XXXX time my loan has ever defaulted XXXX rolled 30 days on XXXX ) 1
2015. The Complainant hired Prospect based on their representations that they are XXXX of the nation 's leading residential lenders and are backed by {$5.00} XXXX in assets. 1
2015. The LO from Homestar Financial stated the loan would be approved with the assumption that the errors would be corrected. The credit corrections were done on or about XXXX XXXX 1
2015. This is a classic and habitual bait and switch. Probably hope that no one would complain but I 've been in this situation before. How could their XXXX offer '' which I received and sent end on XXXX XXXX 1
2015. This lack of response to my dispute is in direct defiance of FCRA 623 which allows consumers to dispute reported data directly with the data furnisher. Their failure to respond to my dispute while continuing to report the alleged account constitutes illegal collections activity as affirmed in XXXX in which the judge found that reporting collections accounts to a consumer reporting agency constitutes collections activity under the FDCPA. 1
2015. We also called numerous times to no-avail. 1
2015.,,Empowerment Ventures 1
2015.,,Ocwen Financial Corporation,MI,49001,,Consent provided,Web,2015-04-26,Closed with explanation,Yes,No,1347556 1
2015.,Company chooses not to provide a public response,SUNTRUST BANKS 1
2016 7
2016 ( Exhibit 4 ) expressing again that the records are correct while still providing no evidence of my switch to e-billing or notification thereof. 1
2016 ( ii ) XXXX BANK XXXX C - XXXX XXXX 1
2016 ( see attached ) 1
2016 ( XXXX ),Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING 1
2016 ) 1
2016 ). Section 1024.41 ( g ) provides the prohibition on dual tracking 1
2016 + {$0.00} Closed DEPT OF ED / XXXX Reported : XXXX XXXX 1
2016 + {$0.00} Closed DEPT OF XXXX / XXXX Reported : XXXX XXXX 1
2016 - Buyer : Complaint Case filed Account ID : XXXX Enclosed herein below is the only communicative correspondence PayPal Inc. provided : Transaction Details : Credit to Credit Card ( XXXX Transaction ID # XXXX ) Original Order Date Type Status Details Amount XX/XX/2016 Order To XXXX Completed Details - {$320.00} USD Related Transactions Date Type Status Details Amount XX/XX/2016 Charge From Credit Card Completed Your transfer from your credit card to your PayPal account is complete. Your transfer from your credit card to your PayPal account is complete. Details {$320.00} USD XXXX XXXX 1
2016 a CHECK # XXXX cleared for {$130.00}. I have contacted the merchant as well as the XXXX of Colorado Attorney General in hopes of recovering the funds to sent to this business. State of Colorado Department Of Law Office of the Attorney General RE : XXXX XXXX aka XXXX XXXX XXXX Dear XXXX XXXX : Thank you for contacting our office with your concerns as we are in receipt of your complaint. Fraud reports enable our office to identify and devote our limited resources to cases supported by law involving widespread harm to Colorado consumers and the associated business environment. Information from the public contributes to potential investigations and may lead to possible legal action taken on behalf of the State of Colorado. As a result we will keep the information obtained from your complaint as part of our ongoing efforts to identify businesses that may engage in patterns of deceptive practices in Colorado. Although we can not take direct action to resolve your concerns 1
2016 A Delinquency Notice for six payments on a lawfully rescinded mortgage A Delinquency Notice for six payments on specifically denied Loan Number : XXXX PDF attached XXXX XXXX 1
2016 and asked if TD Bank would honor this document. 1
2016 and written copies will also be sent via certified postal mail. 1
2016 and XXXX XXXX 1
2016 asking Shellpoint to determine whether the application submitted was complete or incomplete and to provide a list of any documents missing if any. 1
2016 billing period ). The late fees were credited on each account on XXXX/XXXX/16. My NEW IT issue ticket number is # XXXX. 1
2016 by the same individual that appears to feel that banking customers have no recourse regarding his inappropriate official actions. 1
2016 CashNetUSA debited my account in the amount {$90.00} which caused our checking account to be Overdrawn '' by the amount of ( {$92.00} ). I called CashNetUSA on XXXX XXXX 1
2016 due to the Labor Day '' holiday which falls on XXXX XXXX 1
2016 for the most recent misinformation spreading to a customer in need. 1
2016 has caused very negative impacts to my Credit reports ( CBR 's ) and their credit scores per the account closure and then now there 's another hard inquiry on my CBR and there will be another credit card closure per credit grantor/lender. This looks very negative to other creditors that will review my CBRs and will impact me for years to come. I 've also incurred an annual fee of {$39.00} on the newly approved/activated credit card. 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.