Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
2016 I called again 1
2016 letter to me where they return the {$550.00} check that I deposited on XXXX XXXX 1
2016 offer. 1
2016 until XXXX XXXX 1
2016 was a mortgage statement demanding payment for the arrears. Please see the attached supporting documents. 1
2016 which was the last day of my work permit. 1
2016 with both my wife and I as applicants ; however 1
2016 with the same reason. 1
2016 XXXX Date : XXXX XXXX 2
2016 XXXX XXXX Date : XXXX XXXX 1
2016 XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
2016 XXXX XXXX XXXX Date : XXXX XXXX 1
2016 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
2016 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
2016,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,TX,75219,,Consent provided,Web,2016-05-28,Closed with explanation,Yes,Yes,1946009 1
2016,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,TX,752XX,,Consent provided,Web,2016-04-22,Closed with non-monetary relief,Yes,No,1892656 1
2016. 6
2016. After XXXX XXXX passed with no miles awarded 1
2016. Again 1
2016. Assuming the payment clears 1
2016. However 1
2016. I contacted both my home insurance 1
2016. I was not notified of the denial and was told that they could not talk to me.,,Caliber Home Loans 1
2016. Nationstar mortgage 1
2016. Not hearing anything from Seneca 1
2016. She was unable to provide the final closing costs at that time ; however 1
2016. That 's 61 days to receive paperwork that I was told would be sent in 24 hours! 1
2016. The only credit prior to XXXX XXXX 1
2016. The XXXX XXXX web site was down due to some technical problems. I tried to activate the card XXXX XXXX 1
2016. This letter 1
2016. XXXX explained the loan is still in the approval phase and working out the final details with escrow and with XXXX to go forward. Closing 1
2016.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,I.C. System 1
2017 5
2017 If an item says 1
2017 + XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquiry from XXXX XXXX 1
2017 - Email to XXXX XXXX 3. XXXX XXXX 1
2017 and includes the information about my credit line decrease to {$500.00}.,,DISCOVER BANK,MD,20814,,Consent provided,Web,2017-04-12,Closed with explanation,Yes,No,2431457 1
2017 and XXXX was informed by e-mail but they never acknowledged change. Now 1
2017 at XXXX. The receptionist answered the phone and transferred me to XXXX XXXX. 1
2017 I explained to Credit reporting agencies I have several company on my credit report I did n't sign a contract with. I ask for Credit reporting agencies to verify the credit with the company with a sign signature and photo of me to verify the debt. I also contacted the companies certified mail requesting the validation of debt I never received a response from the co mpanies or Credit reporting agencies verifying the debt belonging to me. I have made several called many times to the credit reporting companies via telephone and I have been unsuccessful with resolving this matter. Also I have several unauthorized inquiries on my credit report. I havent requested credit with any companies in the last 6 years. I have a credit freeze on my credit file. With the freeze listed on my credit file my identity has to be verified before pulling my credit which it was n't been verified. The number listed on my credit freeze is the wrong number listed for me which is how I know my identity was never identified. Below is a listed of companies I ask for validation of debt. A sign contract with my signature and a copy of my photo. 1
2017 I r eceived a call at XXXX from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX stating she was preparing my closing with Capital One Ban k . M y question is this normal practice for a lending industry to actually 1
2017 I received a letter saying the same thing for XXXX XXXX verified. On XXXX XXXX 1
2017 under account XXXX 1
2017 via successful fax after attempting to resolve it by contacting their customer service department twice. We did not hear back from XXXX XXXX 1
2017 XXXX am In Transit to Destination 1
2017,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,ALLY FINANCIAL INC.,CA,95358,,Consent provided,Web,2018-01-23,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,2790060 1
2017. 1
2017. It was denied due to insufficient income. This was not relayed to us. we had to call to get a status and that is when we were told that we did n't qualify due to not enough income for the price of the house. We still have not received a formal written denial as of today.,,CONTOUR MORTGAGE CORPORATION,NC,28216,,Consent provided,Web,2017-05-21,Closed with monetary relief,No,N/A,2490035 1
2017. They refuse to remove these inquiries.,,EQUIFAX 1
2017. They refuse to remove these inquiries.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,FL,33062,,Consent provided,Web,2017-07-29,Closed with non-monetary relief,Yes,N/A,2589051 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.