Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
2017. They refuse to remove these inquiries.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
2017. Unfortunately 1
2018 + {$4600.00} Good XXXX XXXX XXXX / XXXX Last reported : XXXX XXXX 1
2018 bank statement showing the initial XX/XX/18 Purchase authorization 1
2018 in case they need to reference or review.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,WA,98229,,Consent provided,Web,2019-01-09,Closed with non-monetary relief,Yes,N/A,3120079 1
2018 reach out for service and cancelled when no response was coming from the merchant. We gave BofA all the information showing the merchant at this point had shown no intent to deliver the service. 1
2019 1
2019 ( XX/XX/XXXX 1
2019 ) 1
2019 enclosed with this letter. 3
2019 there was a transaction balance of {$95.00}. XXXX in purchases even though the account was closed and the XXXX was never activated 1
2019 was to occur. 1
2019 which was OVER a week later 1
2019 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. 1
2020 1
2020 ( FRAUD ) 2. XXXX XXXX Bank opened XX/XX/XXXX2021 ( FRAUD ) 3. XXXX opened XX/XX/XXXX2020 ( FRAUD ) 4. XXXX XXXX opened XX/XX/XXXX2020 ( FRAUD ) 5. XXXX XXXX XXXX opened XXXX XXXX 3
2020 ) I suspect I am a victim of identity fraud.,,EQUIFAX 1
2020 ). 1
2020 + {$82.00} Needs Attention XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Reported : XXXX. XXXX 1
2020 150 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Account # XXXX NO BUSINESS INFORMATION IS ON CREDIT REPORT Account Type : Collection Account Balance : {$95.00},Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
2020 ; 3 ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
2020 ;,,EQUIFAX 1
2020 Apps XXXX XXXX XXXX Refunded {$99.00} XX/XX/XXXX2020 Apps XXXX XXXX XXXX Refunded {$99.00} XXXX XXXX 1
2020 Auto Financing XXXX XXXX Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX Auto Financing XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX Auto Financing XXXX XXXX Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXXAuto Financing XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX Automobile Dealers 1
2020 enclosed with this letter. 1
2020 that the Creditor might report any given Balance of a Proceeding Cycle for the Closing and Usage Rate of the previous Cycle ; I thought that the Creditor was mistaken ; since alterations of the Closing Balance is possibly illegal. 2
2020 XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX,,Exeter Finance 1
2020 XXXX XXXX 1
2020. I do not expect them to follow through with this in enough time for me to actually pay this debt according to the settlement amount. They have continuously created barriers to keep me from paying this debt per the settlement terms. They are essentially forcing me to remain in debt even though I have made every effort to settle this debt with them. I have followed through with my end of the settlement and they continue to disregard the agreed upon settlement and force me to fight with them. This is abuse. Forcing me to continue to deal with this after submitting a payment per the agreed upon terms for more than a month is abuse. They should not be allowed to abuse people 1
2021 2
2021 ) 1
2021 ) and they have been giving me the runaround and transferring me to different departments. My last conversation with Citi was on XXXX XXXX ( after two hours of waiting and being transferred several times ) they told me that they resolved this case in their favor. I asked them for what reason and what evidence do they have 1
2021 + XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquiry : XXXX XXXX 1
2021 ; JXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquiry : XXXX. XXXX 1
2021 ; XXXX XXXX Inquiry Date XXXX ; XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ; XXXX & XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquiry Date XXXX ; XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquiry Date XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquiry Date XXXX ; XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquiry Date XXXX ; XXXX XXXX Inquiry XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquiry Date XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquiry Date XXXX ; XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquiry Date XXXX ; XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquiry Date XXXX ; XXXX XXXX 1
2021 ; XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquiry : XXXX. XXXX ; XXXX XXXX Inquiry : XXXX. XXXX 1
2021 and XXXX 1
2021 contact info XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
2021 unauthorized transaction was not on my bank statement which is posted online. In addition to this 1
2021 XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX : XXXX XXXX 1
2021 XXXX XXXX XXXX 2
2021 {$210.00} There are no valid claims ... accounts were settled with original creditors and has been confirmed 1
2021,,Marlette Funding 1
2021,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,BANK OF AMERICA 1
2021. 1
2021. I note this would not have resulted in additional amounts owed 1
2021. My policy with XXXX XXXX was canceled because of SPS ' refusal to cooperate and provide information in a timely manner 1
2021. Your message 1
2021.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Ocwen Financial Corporation,TX,75217,,Consent provided,Web,2022-01-13,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,5098090 1
2022 2

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.