2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: F

Companies starting with F that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

2.5K companies starting with "F"

Showing 51–100 of 2.5K

Company Complaints
failed to detect or act on these changes. This failure constitutes a breach of its duty of care to a vulnerable elder under XXXX XXXX. 1
failed to disclose to me the debt could be disputed 1
failed to disclose why and any legal grounds does the bank to withhold and/or prevent transfers to another bank of over {$5000.00}. 1
failed to do what they said. The daily calls before XXXX several times a day continued. I attempted to contact XXXX 1
failed to ensure that this account was reported correctly 3
failed to explain their denial adequately 1
failed to file return 1
failed to file the claim with insurance and legally you cant bill a medicaid patient for that failure! So many years have past 1
failed to fix inaccuracies 1
FAILED TO INVESTIGATE MY ISSUE AND FAILED TO OBEY THE LAWS AND REGULATION AND MY PRIVACY RIGHTS. IF I WAS DEALING WITH MONKEYS IN THIS LAST 2 YEARS BY NOW THE MONKEYS WOULD'VE KNOW WHAT TO DO 1
failed to notify me in writing 1
failed to obtain from FDIC the Receiver 's Deed or Bill of Sale on any of the loans it claims to have acquired. An officer of WaMu who was hired by Chase 1
failed to obtain from FDIC the Receiver 's Deed or Bill of Sale on any of the loans it claims to have acquired. An XXXX of XXXX who was hired by XXXX 1
failed to obtain from FDIC the Receiver's Deed or Bill of Sale on any of the loans it claims to have acquired. An officer of WaMu who was hired by Chase 1
failed to offer loan modification under assumption 1
failed to provide accurate payment information 1
failed to provide any chain-of-title or ownership records 1
failed to provide any meaningful investigation results 1
Failed to provide documentation of repossession 1
failed to provide proper loan disclosures 1
failed to provide the misplaced information from their statement. See reverse side for important disclosure information. There is no information located on the reversed side of your demand for payment letter dated XX/XX/XXXX ( See attachments ) XXXX XXXX of Midland Credit Management Inc. obtained my social security number solely for the purposes of forcing me to tender a debt they have no first-hand knowledge of. I am the victim of these circumstances. 1
failed to provide the requested verification documentation 3
failed to provide the required verification 3
failed to provide timely written notice 2
failed to recertify. ] Why would I recertify in XX/XX/2022 1
failed to remove remaining former employers 1
failed to remove the inaccurate information. Your continuous negligence and willful misconduct are not only fraudulent but also punishable by law. 1
failed to report income 1
failed to return the {$1500.00} charged to my account and is now billing me monthly with interest 1
failed to shed any light on the situation. 1
failed to timely process critical paperwork 2
failed to validate the debt... 3
failed to withheld tax 2
failed to yield any tangible resolution or guidance. Their suggestion to visit a physical branch is not feasible 1
failing to address the second reported late payment in XXXX 2
failing to confirm whether my request for an internal investigation had been initiated. It became evident that no action had been taken regarding my demand for a full account investigation. 1
failing to correct inaccurate data 2
failing to include any documentation proving that Medical Revenue Service is authorized to collect this debt. 1
failing to inform of the credit reversal ( 1005.11 ( c ) ( 2 ) ( ii ) ) 1
failing to initiate any meaningful reinvestigation. 3
failing to notify consumers about investigation result 1
failing to notify me 1
failing to prove that they are a certified and bonded agent with legal rights to collect alleged debt. They failed to follow Federal and Civil Rights Laws according to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The alleged debt owner ( XXXX ) and debt collector were never given my consent to transfer this fraudulent document of debt. 1
failing to provide accurate notice of the outcome of disputes 1
failing to provide adequate or accurate notice to consumers of the outcome of their disputes 1
failing to provide loan discharge options 2
failing to provide this notice can result in a penalty up to {$2500.00} and can be enforced by the FTC 6
failing to provide this notice can result in a penalty up to {$2500.00} and can be enforced by the XXXX and that my state attorney general can also enforce this with a {$1000.00} penalty as well. 1
Failing to redeem lawful instruments tendered pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 411 1
failing to remedy the situation while knowing that consumers can not leverage the benefit which they paid for seems like an unfair and/or deceptive trade practice.,,AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY,CA,90403,,Consent provided,Web,2022-06-15,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,5673242 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter F that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related