Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

145,512 companies

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response Most Recent
Company Complaints
1st Franklin Financial Corporation 635
1st Maryland Mortgage Corporation 1
1st Midwest Mortgage Corp 2
1st Money Center, Inc., Hurst, TX Branch 4
1st Nationwide Mortgage of Texas Corp. 3
1st Portfolio Holding Corporation 1
1ST PREFERENCE MORTGAGE CORP 2
1ST RESULTS BILLINGS & COLLECTIONS, INC. 7
1st Step Financial INC. 1
1st United Funding, LLC 1
1st XXXX student loan was charged off 1
1XXXX 1
2 1
2 ( b ) ( 1 ) 2
2 ) closed '' 1
2 ) a printed copy of Tracking # XXXX history 1
2 ) a Return Transcript 1
2 ) definiteness ( known positively 1
2 ) disruption of my online account information access forcing me to call them to then receive no or unclear information 1
2 ) or to enforce an instrument that was destroyed by way of securitization a voluntary act to discharge all debt. 3 ) Prove your authority to legislate over the Precedent Vested Landed Estate [ XXXX XXXX XXXX ] Private Property of THE XXXX XXXX XXXX. Take notice that a de facto basis for powers of authority is not sufficient in this matter. Failure to provide proof of your de jure authority appointed from the Executor Office of the Precedent Vested Landed Estate [ XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX of the XXXX XXXX XXXX constitutes your actions as ultra vires and by operation of law your Charter is dissolved by usurping powers you do not have 1
2 ) or to enforce an instrument that was destroyed by way of securitization a voluntary act to discharge all debt. 3 ) Prove your authority to legislate over the Precedent Vested Landed Estate [ XXXX XXXX XXXX ] Private Property of THE XXXX XXXX XXXX. Take notice that a de facto basis for powers of authority is not sufficient in this matter. Failure to provide proof of your de jure authority appointed from the Executor Office of the Precedent Vested Landed Estate [ XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX constitutes your actions as ultra vires and by operation of law your Charter is dissolved by usurping powers you do not have 1
2 ) or to enforce an instrument that was destroyed by way of securitization a voluntary act to discharge all debt. 3 ) Prove your authority to legislate over the Precedent Vested Landed Estate [ XXXX XXXX XXXX ] Private Property of XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX. Take notice that a de facto basis for powers of authority is not sufficient in this matter. Failure to provide proof of your de jure authority appointed from the Executor Office of the Precedent Vested Landed Estate [ XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX of the XXXX XXXX XXXX constitutes your actions as ultra vires and by operation of law your Charter is dissolved by usurping powers you do not have 1
2 ) police report 1
2 ) that during the time he would help me 1
2 = 60 days 1
2 [ documents ] in review. '' When his subordinates ceased communicating 1
2 and 3. Per state laws 1
2 and 3551 et seq. Conspiracy to commit Bank Fraud contrary to Title 18 1
2 contracts 1
2 days ago I can still receive their Happy Birthday '' email 1
2 days later I received and email telling me the dispute I requested was now open 1
2 days later they transferred {$60.00} back into my account which I did not request. I informed my Bank. They then attempted on various dates to debit my account for varying amounts and it was then that I reported it as fraud to my bank 1
2 month bank statements to meet cash close and reserve requirement of {$6700.00} 1
2 months ago. This occurred on a Friday evening and the funds were available on Saturday. Without contacting either of us 1
2 months in a row no less 1
2 months insurance and taxes 1
2 months later we were offered a modification 1
2 mos ) XX/XX/XXXX ( 7 yrs 2
2 of 3 credit bureaus report the wrong credit limit 3
2 of the disputes show as resolved with no credit issued and one shows that a security credit has been issued even though the representative has told me that all XXXX are still under investigation. 1
2 pages attached. ) The sole proximate cause of reversed payment of check # XXXX was XXXX self-generated unauthorized ECK debit on XX/XX/2019. XXXX self-generated the required check reversal subsequently used by XXXX to misrepresent in fraud blame-shift from XXXX for payment delay to me 1
2 payments are just missing from my account altogether 1
2 phone numbers 1
2 S.E. 2d 766. Federal Reserve Notes are valueless. See IRS Codes Section 1.1001-1 ( 4657 ) C.C.H. ). 1
2 which states that DE Hospitals seeking Certified Public Review status must follow Delaware Health Resources Board regulations which includes Charity Care and FAP offering. 1
2- pay in full up to date 8 months plus all of the legal fees 1
2-104 3
2-207 ( 2 ) ( c ). 1
2-221 1
2. A copy of my passport 3. My SSN Card 4. XXXX National ID As they need the physical ID thats on file which is my passport. Due to the fact that my Passport was held in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement XXXX 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.