Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
& warned Weichert 1
& was powerless to persuade them. I encourage you to question him in a detail as to their responses and attitude. I also feel there may be some type of deeper issue at the financing dept. 1
& we were forced to file Chapter XXXX for the entities owning the properties 1
& would not have enough time to complete it before XXXX,Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING 1
& XX/XX/XXXX 90 days late XX/XX/XXXX 30 days late XXXX XX/XX/XXXX 120 days late XX/XX/XXXX 1
& XX/XX/XXXX 90 days late XX/XX/XXXX 30 days late XXXX XX/XX/XXXX 120 days late XX/XX/XXXX 2
& XX/XX/XXXX 90 days late XX/XX/XXXX XX/XX/XXXX 30 days late equifax XX/XX/XXXX XX/XX/XXXX 120 days late XX/XX/XXXX XX/XX/XXXX 1
& XX/XX/XXXX I ) Confirmation letter contribute for my wife XXXX J ) Household expenses Paid bill for past 12 months K ) history Journal past four years documents sent to Wells Fargo. 1
& XX/XX/XXXX. When AES called 1
& XXXX ) nor any of the various secondary reporting agencies such as ( XXXX 2
& XXXX accounts to be updated as paid as agreed 2
& XXXX ACT ( XXXX U.S.C. XXXX ) -U.S.C XXXX XXXX ( g ) ( XXXX ) ( A ) ** for XXXX XXXX is a common attempt to bank on the consumer not knowing the protected rights they are entitled and the procedures at play in the private sector regarding entities like this 1
& XXXX is Civil liability for willful noncompliance with my consumer report. Any person who willfully fails to comply with any requirement imposed under this subchapter with respect to any consumer is liable to that consumer in an amount equal to the sum of ; any actual damages sustained by the consumer as a result of the failure or damages of not less than {$100.00} and not more than {$1000.00} ; or in the case of liability of a natural person for obtaining a consumer report under false pretenses or knowingly without a permissible purpose 1
& XXXX of XXXX. Except for those months 1
& XXXX repeatedly promised to send forms via snail mail 1
& XXXX U.S.C XXXX 3
& XXXX U.S.C XXXX.,,EQUIFAX 1
& XXXX U.S.C XXXX.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
& XXXX XXXX has not removed the collection information and has chosen to continue to make me a victim of identity theft and is liable for any negative effects of this false information on my credit report..,,Kimball 1
& XXXX XXXX Mod ) was disputed & removed from all credit reports in XXXX 4
& XXXX! They stated they were turning it over to their Fraud Department & would hear back from them within 30 Days. I received a Letter/Notice from them Approximately XXXX Weeks later & the letter stated they had closed the account 1
& XXXX. All wire transfers were approved using the XXXX platform that we were still in the process of being approved to utilize as we had not received the required credentials from Regions Bank. 1
& XXXX. Also I want to be compensated for my info getting out when XXXX had been hacked and allowed my private info to be used by XXXX only knows who. And they have been using it.I kn I w this to be facts indeed. 1
& XXXX. JH utilizes XXXX reporting requirements as agreed upon by all of the CRAs. However 1
& XXXXXXXX accounts to be updated as paid as agreed 1
& XXXXXXXX XXXX ( XXXX U.S.C. XXXX ) -U.S.C XXXX XXXX ( g ) ( XXXX ) ( A ) ** for XXXX XXXX is another common attempt to bank on the consumer not knowing the protected rights they are entitled and the procedures at play in the private sector regarding entities like this 1
' '' Baker v. G.C. Services Corp. 3
' '' They don't do it like this anywhere else in the country '' 1
' '' XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX 1
' 'Inspections ... ' always billed the day after the grace period ends 1
' 'it is impossible for me to speak with anyone in corporate 1
' but they 'had not had any response. ' I categorically dispute these claims 1
' by not closing the account properly. When I opted to settle and pay with XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX 1
' etc. and thus 1
'' a collection account with a limit 2
'' accelerated filer 1
'' banking 1
'' business decision 1
'' Collection 1
'' denial of housing opportunities '' ]. 3
'' financial loss ''. 1
'' Help me understand why you felt unfair even we have already refunded you the full fees '' 1
'' I drove to a new gaming facility in XXXX 1
'' Is Phillips & Cohen a subsidiary of XXXX? 1
'' item damaged '' ) 1
'' Keep your AMEX account from going further past due and avoid further negative impact to credit score '' Pay {$40.00} to keep your account from becoming further delinquent. '' Now 1
'' mail server 1
'' maximum '' means the greatest in quantity or highest degree attainable 1
'' our 3
'' Reinsertion WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.