2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: M

Companies starting with M that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

3.0K companies starting with "M"

Showing 301–350 of 3.0K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
making my hardship and good faith efforts even more relevant. I disclosed this to XXXX agents multiple times and was still denied any resolution. 1
making my mortgage payments on time 1
making my recertification not due until XX/XX/XXXX. 1
making my social security card a credit card. This account was authorized by my social security card 3
making no sense. Also 1
making no sense. I find Transunion to be deceptive. I also contacted them regarding addresses on my account which are incorrect 1
making Online Dispute claims and identity theft claims online as well 2
making payments. So 1
making some easy numbers on this process 1
making sure to let them know I wasn't trying to open another fraud claim at this time. I was told I would be mailed all the information I requested. It has been a couple of months now 1
making the account next due for XX/XX/XXXX. 1
making the account unverifiable 1
making the company ( Western Union ) dishonest and fraudulent. There should be no confusion or missing disclosures 1
making the continued charge-off reporting unlawful under 15 U.S.C. 605B / 1681c-2. 3
making the data objectively inaccurate. 1
making the delinquency unverified and in violation of FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ). 1
making the denial unjustifiable.,,Chime Financial Inc,WV,254XX,,Consent provided,Web,2025-09-25,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,16182852 1
making the entire reporting unverifiable 2
making the information reported inaccurate and incomplete. 9
making the interaction incredibly distressing. 1
making the monthly payments large from the start. When the ten-year balloon payment is due 1
making the process even longer. 1
making the process even more infuriating. Now 1
making the purchase unaffordable. Issue 2 : Hidden Fees & Inflated Purchase Price : After conducting a credit check 1
making the requests ). [ POA attached ] The response also suggested follow-up be made with their customer service department. 1
making the same inquiry again and again 1
making the seizure improper under state law o This was not an isolated mistake ; the pattern documents show this is how Wells Fargo systematically processes out-of-state legal process 4. Deceptive Financial Practices ( 15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq. & Texas DTPA ) o The blanket authorization language ( page 39 ) is drafted to disguise the bank 's policy of avoiding due diligence on legal process o Consumers reasonably expect that banks will comply with state domestication requirements and provide notice before seizing accounts o Wells Fargo 's policy is designed to shift all risk to the consumer while reserving the bank 's right to act on invalid legal process Financial and Consequential Harm The seizure of {$32000.00} on XX/XX/year> 1
making the situation even more damaging to my credit profile. 1
making the situation impossible. 1
making the total value after just XXXX redemptions {$1400.00}. 1
making the unfortunate assumption that they contained the same information that was explained on the phone. It does 1
making the vehicle incapable of passing required smog and VIN inspections in Oregon 1
making their acts unfair According to the FDCPA 3
making them appear genuine at first glance. 3
making them inaccurate and unverifiable. Equifax has therefore failed to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation as required by law. 1
making them inaccurate and unverifiable. Experian has therefore failed to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation as required by law. 2
making them liable for damages ( up to {$5000.00} ) 1
making them liable for damages of up to {$1000.00} per violation. 1
making them liable for deceptive collection practices under federal law. 3
making them liable for statutory damages of at least {$1000.00} per violation 2
making them patently inaccurate. 2
making them physically impossible for a single individual to complete under normal travel conditions. USAA did not address this physical-impossibility argument at all. 1
making them reluctant to return the funds without a proper liability waiver. 1
making them think something is coming in a few months to walk them through this process. It is now past that two months later 1
making this a clear violation of the FCRA. 2
making this additional request unreasonable. 1
making this an unfair practice. According to the FDCPA 1
making this contract null and void. Page 5/5 of the contract is missing the representative/seller printed name. Also 1
making this debt over seven years old and eligible for removal under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ). Equifax failed to properly investigate and remove this outdated account. 1
making this debt over XXXXeven years old and eligible for removal under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ). Experian failed to properly investigate and remove this outdated account. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter M that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →