Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
again incorrect information from Santander! I disputed 1
again incorrect information from XXXX! I disputed 1
again it happened. I asked why my account wasn't debited 1
again Key Bank 's representative entered the property 1
again no answer. As I am writing this letter today 1
again no conflict mentioned. During installation 1
again no progress,,Ocwen Financial Corporation,TX,78209,,Consent provided,Web,2020-05-30,Closed with monetary relief,Yes,N/A,3675254 1
again no success. I did go to the email that was sent to me 1
again not able to pick up. Today WU stated case is closed. This is a wire transfer company that refuses to refund our money. We have done all requirements to WU to acquire our money back. They are stealing our money.,,WESTERN UNION COMPANY 1
again nothing happened 1
again questioning that the documents were not validation of my debt to XXXX XXXX XXXX An additional objection to the validity of the debt was made in two letters to the Small Claims court dated XX/XX/XXXX and a revision with the same date sent on XX/XX/XXXX. Unfortunately 1
again questioning that the documents were not validation of my debt to XXXX XXXX XXXX. An additional objection to the validity of the debt was made in two letters to the Small Claims court dated XX/XX/XXXX and a revision with the same date sent on XX/XX/XXXX. Unfortunately 1
again reiterating that I should call back Monday. I informed them that I could not call during work hours on Monday and that I was very disappointed they would not take initiative to provide paperwork supporting a payoff check that I was trying to provide. At this point I asked to speak with a manager. I was informed that there is no manager 1
again reported it to XXXX on or around XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. I 've checked the credit bureaus 1
again reporting a recent Failed to Pay activity. I again contacted Experian by phone to discern what I was doing wrong. Experian stated they were reporting the data as received by XXXX XXXX 1
again saying I should contact XXXX XXXX. 1
again telling me I owed {$13000.00}. 1
again they could n't find my fax 1
again they have the merchandise and kept the money {$1300.00} It is CRIMINAL AND SOMEONE SHOULD PAY BACK THE MONEY STOLEN AND someone 1
again they never responded back with any REAL VERIFIBLE INFO. I also ask them to compare EXACT NAMES and Addresses and DELETE accounts that aren't 100 % accurate 1
again this is impossible and inaccurate. There is missing/inaccurate data for throughout the payment history of this account. 1
again to my local branch 1
again to speak with a manager and she put me on hold. I held for 20 minutes and hung up and called customer service again. I was told by another lady that the account was transferred to XXXX. I asked what is XXXX. At first she said that she did not know 1
again told me to give it another 30 to 60 days to resolve. 1
again told my XXXX VISA was overlimit. I recalled XXXX VISA who defamed me and said I never talked to an agent who authorized me use of my card for one night. By the time this procedure was over 1
again unexpected ) 1
again using Digital Account Number ending in XXXX. I received a new card number again. Yet 1
again using my XXXX ACCT # XXXX. ALTHOUGH I selected XXXX ACCT # XXXX 1
again utilizing the Index + Margin structure. 1
again vaguely suggesting I need to address some kind of debt-related issue but without any account number 1
again what they were claiming for excess wear and tear '' was egregious for a 48 month lease 1
again which I never approved 1
again with inaccurate data. There was even a difference in the amount added to the monthly balance for the month of XX/XX/XXXX across the bureaus. One bureau had an increase of {$100.00} and the others {$100.00}. In addition TransUnion and XXXX are reporting a high balance of {$6600.00} on a closed account 1
again with inaccurate data. There was even a difference in the amount added to the monthly balance for the month of XX/XX/XXXX across the bureaus. One bureau had an increase of {$100.00} and the others {$100.00}. In addition XXXX and Equifax are reporting a high balance of {$6600.00} on a closed account 1
again with inaccurate data. There was even a difference in the amount added to the monthly balance for the month of XX/XX/XXXX across the bureaus. One bureau had an increase of {$100.00} and the others {$100.00}. In addition XXXX and XXXX are reporting a high balance of {$6600.00} on a closed account 1
again with my concern in knowing that two mortgage specialist informed me that I could move the 6 months of suspended payments to the back end of the loan 1
again with no issues. 1
again with no justification 1
again with no response. 1
again without my approval or awareness. 1
again without my knowledge. 1
again without my permission. 1
again without my prior knowledge or permission 1
again without notifying me or seeking my consent Account Timeline : The history of the account provides some insight into how these charges came to be generated : XXXX : Account was opened as a fee-free 1
again without providing me any information as to why they closed the dispute. ( Today they told me that they attempted to call me after I sent the documents in 1
again without the knowledge or consent of my daughter or myself. 1
again without XXXX ' permission or knowledge. Roughly one year later 1
again XX/XX/XXXX 1
again XXXX 1
again XXXX and now in XXXX. This benefit policy as not been honored as the contract or reverse mortgage as not been funded. Also 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.