2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: A

Companies starting with A that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

29.6K companies starting with "A"

Showing 551–600 of 29.6K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
a late payment of 30 4
a late payment of XXXX 3
a late remark appeared. I was never formally notified. This mark has led to credit card denials and increased insurance rates XXXX XXXX XXXX Account # : XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Date Opened : XX/XX/XXXX High Credit : {$520.00} Late Payment Issue : The reported late status is not consistent with my records Law : FCRA 611 requires the reinvestigation of disputed entries and removal if unverifiable Story : I enrolled in autopay and theres no reasonable basis for this negative remark. Ive lost job opportunities because of this misreported entry on background checks. I demand full verification 1
A latter from my bank And they still have not activated my card I told my mother XXXX they do n't care My mother XXXX tonite and XXXX the The card is Netspend Stay away!,Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,Netspend Corporation,AK,995XX,,Consent provided,Web,2017-03-20,Closed with explanation,Yes,No,2395136 1
a law designed to safeguard consumers ' privacy and control over their credit information. 3
a lawyer at Winn Law Group 1
a lawyer at XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
a lawyer named XXXX XXXX 1
a legal document what??? he became frustrated told me not to yell and that this was a legal matter and that he couldnt discuss much of anything else. 1
a legally binding contract abusing the elderly. 1
a lender name I have never used 1
a lender that claims they provide federal funds despite primarily operating as a commercial entity working with XXXX XXXX military members. The claims of federal funding have prevented their participation in my debt counseling program. Instead 1
a letter explaining I am a minor ( XXXX and XXXX XXXX ) and unable to get a state ID until I am XXXX and XXXX XXXX. They said ok and to use my expired school ID ans that it will take 5 business days to review. I sent in the school ID 1
a letter for proof of address 6
a letter from Chase temporary credit {$1200.00} to my new account ; 4. On XX/XX/XXXX 1
a letter from me disputing the fraudulent bank transactions and a copy of my CA drivers license. In my letter of dispute I stated My rights 1
a letter from Social Security stating myself as being her representative of her monthly statements and a copy of her death certificate 1
A letter from XXXX XXXX attempting to coerce me into signing a waiver of my rights ( which I refused ). 1
a letter goes to the credit agencies. 1
a letter has been mailed. I do not feel that this is right that I am being treated wrongfully. My account with your bank was scammed including the use of XXXX. 1
a letter notified and proof of my identity 4
a letter of explanation for a deposit 1
a Letter of Indemnity is required from XXXX. XXXX has denied me this letter and is unwilling to get involved. I have no contact information for someone at Netspend to contact regarding this matter. I fear Netspend will continue to hold my funds XXXX citing my inability to secure this Letter of Indemnity. '' CFPB 1
a letter of warning 1
a letter stating my account is not in forbearance and constant calls 1
a letter was received from PennyMac indicating the coverage information had not been processed ( see copy of letter attached ). As a result 1
a liaison from Chases Executive Office 1
a liar 2
a licensed provider of money transfer services. All money transmission is provided by PayPal 1
a lien never recorded on record no one ever filed for a lost note at this time. How can an assignment of deed of Trust attach itself to a Judgement lien in XXXX 7 years later. when it is now accelerated defaulted debt and time barred debt and furthermore neither servicesr will answer a validation letter and or QWR with proof who is now the owner of this time barred debt. Recording fabricated assignments on land records is a crime and is the easiest way for title thief and or a non-judicial foreclosure to steal the property from rightful owner. This needs to be investigated and sent up to the federal0 department for further investigation for Mortgage fraud and or Title Thief of private property. These assignments are now clouding the record so that I can't sell the property and pay the debt to the rightful lien holder of the Judgement ( XXXX XXXX ) whom the Judge believed to be the owner of the date at the time. The servicer is once again making themselves Holder in due course when this debt was transferred assigned or sold after it was accelerated and in default. This is also impossible. The property is now on a non- judicial foreclosure list from defaulted debt ( a Zombie Loan ) and fabricated wrong assignments recorded on record threw a Mers data base. I'm asking that CFPB intervene and do not allow this non judicial foreclose sale 1
a LIFE. 1
a link was provided to see your current status on your order. I checked it and it stated my couch was still waiting to be shipped. This gave me hope that I would still get my couch. In the meantime 1
a list of all my email contacts with the merchant since he left and disconnected his phone 1
a list of financial advisors I could borrow from. If I didn't give the $ XXXX 1
a list of unauthorized inquiries 1
a listing of the XXXX hotels that are under the same parent company 2
a little better response and explanation could be provided. I believe because this is not a large amount 1
a living man and Executor of the Estate 1
a living man of the XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
a loan account opened at XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX in the amount of {$4300.00} 1
a loan on my second property. 1
a loan processor was assigned to our loan and requested ADDITIONAL information from us that could have been requested originally as it was not a follow on to original documentation. That was the first of many future examples of Freedom Mortgage Company using a delay tactic of waiting a week or so 1
a loan was taken out fraudulently I immediately contacted DIVERSIFIED. 1
a LoanCare representative told me the modification had been denied by the VA and that foreclosure proceedings were being resumed. This was the first time anyone told me the modification required separate VA approval this was never disclosed when the offer was made in XXXX is violating federal mortgage servicing rules ( Regulation X / RESPA 1
a local lawyer informed me. The way to go is amicable solution or ( if amicable solution failed XXXX to have money ready and be prepared to lose the case 1
a long with other CFPB consent orders cited herein 1
a lot of customers recently have had negative experiences with this company. I then receive a response 5 hours later after requesting card be closed that it may be credited the following month but I was told that for the previous month. Just more nonsense. A customer service specialist reached out and when I responded letting them know Id be filing this complaint 1
a lot of legal paperwork after all. UGH! They actually opened my box without me being there and with out my permission! 1
a lot of people who asked in the hospital if there would be any further bills after the insurance copayment. And were told that no. And also 1
a lot of the time 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter A that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →