Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
all these appraisals were performed based on the implication that the bank was willing to negotiate a deal with me. 1
All these documents requested by Seterus were sent 3 years ago and WE RECEIVED WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THEY WERE RECEIVED BY SETERUS. 1
all these evidence of their predatory Lending Practice. Based on these we request that they reimburse the payment of {$4200.00} 1
all these frauds could have been avoided. 1
all these information were part of the submission. 1
all they are telling me is to wait. 1
all they looked at was one piece and sided with the merchant. XXXX also said I should have known to immediately disputed the charge when the merchant was unreachable. Now I am left to pay off a service that I never received because XXXX decided I did not contact them soon enough rather than trying to reach the merchant first. Supervisor XXXX was quick to say there is nothing he can do but I can write in a complaint.,,JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.,CA,94133,,Consent provided,Web,2020-05-20,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,3661450 1
all they said was 1
all they would tell me was that it was n't THEIR file 1
all things that can be used to identify me. I do NOT understand why 1
all this could have been avoided. 1
all this money in my account is being held {$8200.00} is alot of money to be holding with doing deep investigation 1
all though nothing was supposed to change until XX/XX/XXXX. I contacted SPS and filed a complaint and they stated that my mortgage payment had always been that amount. They had no idea I had documentation and confirmation from my relationship manager when the XXXX was applied to my account. SPS asked me to send the statement that showed as of XX/XX/XXXX my mortgage payment had decreased to {$1200.00}. I was told by my relationship manager 1
all three accounts must be immediately deleted from all credit bureaus. 2
all three bureaus have changed the status of this account with a rating of 5 which is 120 days past due. 1
all three cards have been completely drained by USBank. 1
all three charges appeared as still processing. If they were still processing 1
all three credit bureaus are reporting different information 6
all three credit bureaus have responded by simply marking these entries as verified '' without providing any proof or evidence of a proper investigation into my dispute. 7
all three major credit bureaus have reported varying instances of late payments during three distinct months 2
all three major credit bureaus have reported varying instances of late payments during XXXX distinct months 1
all three of those payment attempts were denied. The first payment attempt was to XXXX ( Merchant XXXX ) for {$150.00} 1
all to its financial benefit. 1
all to no avail as you ignore and dismiss her and her authorized representatives. Among others 1
all to no avail. 2
all to no avail. There is no phone number where I can reach a live person to deal with 1
all to the detriment and hardship of the borrower. PHH has ineptly turned a simple Temporary Hardship Forbearance Plan Agreement ( Plan ) into a living nightmarish XXXX.,,Ocwen Financial Corporation,FL,XXXXX,Older American,Consent provided,Web,2024-12-11,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,11100937 1
all transactions were charged because I was not labeled/considered active duty/retired. '' This is so infuriating the abject abuse. 1
all using the chip on the card. 1
all utilities and XXXX fees and pay XXXX XXXX mortgage 1
all was in order for TD Bank to process with the processing of the application and closure of the loan as indicated. 1
all Wells Fargo staff acknowledging the full payment for escrow shortage paid but stating cost would rise regardless. This is untrue. I had a conversation with a woman at Wells Fargo when I received the letter 1
all went to interest. No money was applied to my principal. I understood now why agents were putting me on long Holds and then disconnecting. They probably found it difficult to try to explain five months of interest 1
ALL WESTERN MORTGAGE 13
all which could be remediated by the letter I requested. 1
all which I believe proved my claim. On XX/XX/XXXX CapitalOne sent a letter telling me I did not provide the requested information 1
all which is very expensive. Plus 1
all while deliberately a hutting the door on my opportunity to reclaim my membership points within 90 days of notification of cancellation. Their XXXX XXXX email stated consumers have 90 days from that notification to reclaim their points. I was on the phone with American Express before my XXXX XXXX due datenot even 30 days laterdiscussing my account 1
all while developing bank statements which inconspicuously hide fraudulent activity by listing that the loan interest rate is fixed 1
all while I had no access to the account. 1
all while I have been paying what I could afford now. The excessive amount of legal action taken against me during the pandemic amounts to cruel and usual punishment! 1
all while I lose my job and any chance of getting into my own home 1
all while I was stuck on the side-lines 1
all while interest rates continue to rise and I feel like no one at NFCU will assist me. This is time sensitive and has major financial impact on me and my life 1
all while posing as the original creditor. This is fraudulent and constitutes a misrepresentation of creditor status. 1
all while reporting the account late despite the fraud reports. They also at one point agreed 1
all will be corrected. This matter continued to grow in dollars they claimed owed - somehow they got to 4 months 1
all with mixed messages. This incessant and confusing correspondence has only added to the distress and frustration I have experienced throughout this ordeal. 1
all with zero purchases and a XXXX balance 1
all withheld from me 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.