2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 4.6K–4.6K of 13.5K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
the Merchant provides a simulated Trading Portal that putatively 1
the merchant states we didnt allow him to complete the installation. In addition 1
the merchant withheld the original receipt and the original contract copy that I signed on the day of the procedure. When I demanded a copy 1
the merchants decision not to honor your refund request was based upon the original drapes being incorrectly measured. The merchant advised that they remeasured and reinstalled with exactly what you ordered. As a result 1
the message reads AGAIN today. HOW can I get my XXXX ending in XXXX connected? I have tried to call the XXXX # for Support 1
the messages do not open 1
the messages in our USAA account inbox of me sending the aforementioned documents and the confirmation from USAA came on XXXX XX/XX/2023 when I sent them and the supposed XXXX XXXX letter was the latest message ( see XXXX ). 1
the method of communication used for verification 1
The method of communication used to conduct the investigation 1
The method of delivery 1
the method that you used 1
The Michigan Department of State 1
The Minacs Group (USA) Inc. 19
the minimal they loan 1
the minimum deposit needed to bring your account to a zero balance was $ XXXXThis deposit amount does not take into consideration any outstanding items. '' XXXX XXXX an NSF grace fee refund is credited back to my account for {$70.00} and my balance is back to {$1.00} ... all is well Now here is where it starts getting messed up again... 1
the misapplication of the Extra Day Grace Period policy has resulted in an unjust financial penalty 1
the mishandling of educational records can result in federal enforcement actions 4
the mishandling of evidence associated with this case and lack of investigation prevented me from filing all charges at once. I have sent ample sensitive documentation via fax and email which discover 's fraud department stated from XX/XX/XXXX to XXXX they did not receive despite confirmation of receipt via fax and usps mail 1
the mishandling or unauthorized sharing of my personal data 3
the misleading customer service 1
the misrepresentation of products offered 1
the missed payment was appropriately reported to the CRAs. To clarify 1
the Missouri Attorney General 1
the mobile deposit feature 1
the modification and foreclosure processes. These knowingly false statements and representations on a mortgage 1
the modification application was denied because they could n't lower the payment and it took them six months to figure this out? In retro spec 1
the Mohela representative said that they were STILL unable to lower my payment at this time 1
the mold returned and continued to spread. These unsafe conditions directly affected health and well-being. 1
the moment it was discharged 1
the monetary value displayed on your documentation did not match the monetary value claimed on your Claim Form 1
the money arrived in my account on XX/XX/XXXX. And 1
The Money Company 2
the money deposited was a loan to the bank. This is consistent with GAAP and the matching principles. 1
the money didn't arrive there even after a week. And when I went to this bank branch again on XX/XX/XXXX to clarify the situation 1
the money has already been pulled out of my account 1
THE MONEY HOUSE, INC. 13
the money I added from checking account 1
the money I transferred XXXX {$5100.00} XXXX was cancelled by HSBC and returned back to my account. When I called them up to ask why they had blocked my transfer they started asking me very detailed questions about where the money came from where it was going to. I was on the phone for almost 1.5 hours 1
the money in the escrow account would be returned about XXXX weeks after the loan closes. I also demanded that the new loan not have an escrow balance at all since Rocket has not proven themselves a trustworthy steward of my money. As of XX/XX/XXXX 1
the money is here. I get the XXXX payment goes to over XXXX a month. I am having difficulty paying and they do a few deferral payments. 1
the money is sent to the correct address 1
the money is somewhere with BofA. I feel that there is a scam or fraud within the organization the target of which are vulnerable new customers like myself. I hope to be proven wrong.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,BANK OF AMERICA 1
the money never arrived in my bank account. Instead 1
the money should be accessible in 3 to 5 biz days. I ask how am I to find out 1
the money should had been back. 1
the money still has not been deposited into my account. 1
the money still not return to us.,,JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.,,XXXXX,,Consent provided,Web,2023-12-04,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,7948269 1
the money that is rightfully mine will be given to me. 1
the money was allocated for an overdue mortgage payment. I asked that they reverse the debit 1
the money was delivered 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →