2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 3.7K–3.8K of 13.5K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network 1
the financial devastation that you are causing my family. I will seek financial damages should this not be resolved immediately for the cost of my new home.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,NY,140XX,,Consent provided,Web,2017-08-28,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,2652471 1
the financial entities and several other debt collection agencies refused 1
the financial institution 3
the financial institution must investigate and determine whether an error occurred within 10 business days of receiving the notice of error. Additionally 1
the financial institution shall perform a separate and new account review. I further explained that the account is a joint account and the other account holder is not a listed party on the garnishment order therefore 1
the financial manager 1
the Financial Times reported. 1
the financing statement 1
the finding and the reasoning behind the finding are not shared with the customer. I did not know my case reached a decision 1
the fine-print on the back of the statement had language about promotions and deferred interest saying : There is one type of Deferred Interest Purchase : No Payments + No interest if paid in full in 6 months Purchases : Deferred Interest Purchases on which no payments will be due during the six-month deferred interest period. 1
the firm assists clients in navigating complex international markets while prioritizing ethical and environmentally responsible approaches. 1
the firm proceeded as though proper service had occurred. As a result of these inconsistent and improper practices 2
the firm would have possession of evidence ( in the form of the telephone recordings ) that they continued the litigation in bad faith. I do not believe it is a defense to claim they didn't know and simply bury their heads in the sand in order to avoid looking at evidence. 1
the first 3 - 4 agents were not satisfied with the answers and denied me the ability to unlock my report. Only after almost 2 hours of repeated calls did I reach an agent that was finally satisfied with my answers and unlocked the report. As anyone can imagine 1
the first a payment of {$500.00} on XXXX/XXXX/16. 1
the first agent I spoke with insisted I had to be transferred. When I get transferred I am just put on hold for hours on end and a supervisor never calls me back 1
the first and second charges were authorized by me and supported by lease agreements I had signed and invoices stating the exact amounts I had agreed to pay. 1
the first being {$10.00} followed by significantly higher payments the remaining months. I was told that this would be the best settlement 1
the first by the end of the month ( XXXX XXXX 1
the first conversation the agent confirmed I will indeed receive my points. So with this inconsistency 1
the first CSR on XXXX XXXX should have opened an investigation into it. 1
the first for a credit line up to {$30000.00} 1
the first letter Chime requested 1
the first line of business was finding the dispute form I had emailed or resubmitting a new dispute form. Within a day or two XXXX called me and said that the Fraud Dept. had the dispute form and the investigation would be reopened. Moving forward 1
the first of the remaining payments for {$120.00} were deducted from my account. 1
the first of these two letters 1
the first on XX/XX/XXXX 1
the first one that I was not notified 1
the first one was {$190.00} second one was {$1300.00}. the claim for {$190.00} was paid with no problem however the second one wasn't. I called and asked them why. Some excuse was given and it was suggested by B of A representative to file a police report. Which I completed before the call and was currently waiting on a copy to present to the business. I received all faxing and mailing information for B of A. Since XX/XX/XXXX I have faxed copies of the police report 12 different times!!!!! I EVEN FAXED FROM A B of A BRANCH. I have called everyday for a month 1
the first payment ( the only payment that should have happened ) went through. And again 1
the first payment is not there so each subsequent payment is applied as if it is a month late. I am quite concerned that 1
the first payment was reported as 30 days late due to the payment being short {$16.00} 2
the first reason was that too many checks were being processed and that it was mailed late and now no reason 1
The first rep I spoke to kept trying to educate me that interest is charged when payment is late 1
the first rep told me that I didn't have a credit limit 1
the first representative told me to try again. The second 1
the first set of chargebacks were closed against me. They said they would appeal the banks decision. More and more chargebacks were closed against me and I asked for a contact and the name of the bank. I was denied this information and was left helpless to resolve the issues. I did n't know the bank 1
the first time I was made aware that payment was being soughtand that the repairs had not been formally covered under warrantywas over XXXX months later 1
the first two of these payments were reversed 1
the first week in XXXX we get another FOUR DUPLICATE certified letters/copies of foreclosure letters saying we owe over {$28000.00}. The same letters we have received RELENTLESSLY since XXXX of this year. I 'm at a loss trying to effectively communicate with these people and NOW I feel discriminated against when they make an offer 1
the five weeks Ive been attempting to work with HMF is going to increase exponentially because nobody at HMF believes its their responsibility to actually assist 1
the Flagstar Bank representative advised that I could not retain the revised payment ( {$2400.00} ) but could apply for state assistance. 1
the flight can not be changed because it is a basic economy flight. I was sure it said economy when I made the reservation 1
the flights 1
the flood happened and we were then immediately displaced. As soon as the building was shut down by the town 1
the flood insurance policy through XXXX would not extend the payment deadline. Again I called the Essex XXXX department who said they made a mistake but refused to make the premium payment in time to avoid a lapsing of policy. After repeated phone calls to Essex customer service who also admitted the error 1
the floor manager asked if I had any proof of automatic payments or the dispute. Exhausted 1
the floors were swept and mopped so that {$20.00} charge should be removed. Next 1
the Florida Attorney Generals Office 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →