2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 5.7K–5.7K of 13.5K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
the spreadsheet titled Loan Summaries & Est. Pay Off contains the following calculations : A. Hypothetical breakdown of each loan no forbearance B. Current breakdown of each loan with forbearance C. Hypothetical breakdown of estimated interest & principal pay off in years no forbearance D. Current breakdown of estimated interest & principal pay off in years with forbearance E. Proposed resolution I am currently paying Navient {$1400.00} per month which is 55 % of my net monthly income. According to column F in Calculation D. 1
the staff denied me this. Honda Financial has kept on harassing me with calls everyday. They want me to pay with my debit card 1
the staff told me that I can have my creditor to contact their Business Relation Department directly and I requested her to give me the phone number again as I do not know where I put the number last time. The staff refused to give me the phone number and said my creditor should know the number. Then I called the American Express Credit Bureau Unit again to ask them to help solving the problem that initiated by their mistake. The staff insists they will not make any outbound phone call in any circumstances. 1
the staff told me to ONLY fax the dispute department again ),Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,CITIBANK 1
the Standard Payment Plan for Consolidated Loans does not qualify for PSLF 1
the standards restrict XXXX from foreclosing while the homeowner is being considered for a loan modification. 1
The Star Financial 5
The Stark Collection Agency, Inc. 171
the starting bid was around {$170000.00} 1
the State Attorney General 3
the state attorney general 1
the State Attorney General office as well as the Department of Education to contact your company right away about the problem. I am giving your company one last time to correct this ASAP 1
the State Bank of India in XXXX has a legal as well as moral obligation to return our money with interest. We have exhausted all other avenues of communication 1
the state deceptive trade practices acts were enacted by the various states following the passage of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( FTC Act ) 1
the state equalized value uncapped and more than doubled to {$67000.00}. The treasurer stated this happens all the time that the wrong tax year is used for mortgage processing which is deceiving and financially devastating to new home buyers. We were also told 1
the state in which I resided at the time that the litigation was filed 1
the State insurance authorities 13
the state maximum rate is still in effect and the auto-refinancing option that the dealer promised is no longer feasible. This leaves them multiple options and minimizes the chance of any financial loss on their behalf. The seemingly free money is then left on the table for their intended taking. 1
the State of California Attorney General stepped in after four solid years and after four years of lies 1
the State of Nevada can remove recorded documents since this document can be obtained by the lender or servicer for fraud purposes when the original documents are lost! This is the reason why we are requesting the servicer to allow us to view the original documents with a document examiner to verify authenticity! So 1
the State of Wisconsin 1
the stated benefits. 1
the stated lender is a nonentity 1
the statement contained false information 1
the statement date of XX/XX/XXXX 1
the statement fails to acknowledge the supporting documentation submitted in the initial dispute. 1
the statement last month showed the principle owed on this {$800.00} loan was NOT listed ( except as a total so far for all payments made ) 1
the statement of account provided does not tell where these charges and credits were originated or when.,,Mandarich Law Group 1
the statement of XXXX/XXXX/XXXX shows XXXX The pay-off quoted to me on XXXX was {$39000.00} which did not include any XXXX or XXXX Payments 1
the statement shows an auto debit amount of {$200.00} on XX/XX/XXXX. ( Again 1
the statement that XXXX XXXX had no additional questions or concerns '' is a blatant lie -- I do still have a major concern -- getting these fraudulent charges credited back to me. As a result of Bank of America 's incompetence 1
the statements fail to reflect any information regarding the loan deferrals I was granted during the pandemic in XXXX and for hardship in XX/XX/XXXX. There is no indication of how these deferrals impacted my loans maturity date 1
the status is irreversible 1
the status of default will never be changed unless I pay the entire amount owed which is currently sitting at {$72000.00}. So far 1
the status of this payment was processed. Subsequently 1
the status reported also leads potential creditors to believe the account is perpetually one-hundred eighty ( 180 ) days past-due but remains in a receivable status instead of being reported in a charge-off status. Federal banking laws require XXXX XXXX to charge-off the account not more than 180 days past-due. While XXXX XXXX insists the account was placed in a charge-off status on or around XXXX XX/XX/XXXX 1
the status updated date never changed either 1
the statute of limitations applies in this case and you know this 1
the STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS expired. Still 1
the statute of limitations for collecting most consumer debts is four years from the date of default ( Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code 16.004 ). 1
the statute of limitations for collecting on a charged-off debt may be significantly shorter than the original contract period. Depending on the applicable state law 1
the statute of limitations for legal action has expired. 1
the statute of limitations states that this is invalid. 1
the statute of limitations would've expired in the state of Oregon. 1
the steps I took were : XXXX ) Log into EXCHANGE XXXX ) XXXX linked banks 1
the steps in the priority will be adjusted ( in reverse order ) to produce successive XXXX % increases in DTI ( but in no event higher than XXXX % ) 1
the storage has been resumed '' even though it had not been charged 1
the store does not respond by telling the customer to contact the manufacturer 1
the store manager/saleswomen returned the remaining item and sold it back to me on an interest free payment plan. 1
the store XXXX could not help me with a pre-paid account issue but was able to help me connect to a customer service agent on the phone to help with this matter. After speaking to a rep for over an hour 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →