2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: I

Companies starting with I that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

25.6K companies starting with "I"

Showing 25.1K–25.1K of 25.6K

Company Complaints
it was apparent that the PMI could only cancellable via loan payments compared to the original appraised value at closing. While not a major issue 1
it was apparent to me that the call was legit. I have asked numerous managers at Wells Fargo regarding this single issue 1
it was approved 1
it was approved and allowed under Coinbase 's User Agreement and Card Agreement. They also advised me to try transactions and see the result and told me there was no other way to determine ahead of time if a merchant violated Coinbase 's terms of service. See attached recording of that call ( Support Call ) 1
it was approved. I found the details in 2 emails from XXXX 1
it was Barclays that I chose to build a relationship with. I could have qualified with XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
it was blocked. I again tried two more times to email the new email address 1
it was brought to my attention that not only they were maliciously reporting this debt on my credit report with all three bureaus after previous correspondence via the letters with the credit viewers directly as well as themselves that they had sold the debt three different times to three different creditors. Additionally 1
it was calculated and coercive in how it withheld remedies and obstructed communication.,,Block 1
it was calculated that I would be saving well over {$90000.00} otherwise I would have not left XXXX XXXX. 1
it was clear the bank lacked an efficient system for promptly verifying such details. I corrected her 1
it was clear they actually HAD NOT adequately read my complaint. Each time I re-explained my complaint 1
it was clear to me that review of the check had been completed 1
it was clearly marked as fraud. Again 1
it was closed! I didnt close the account 1
it was completed for inquiries for XXXX it was verified. I stated that I received an email from autocap on XX/XX/2019 stating that XXXX XXXX XXXX has begun the process of having the inquiry deleted and theres no way they verified this inquiry. She stated that they can not delete inquiries and it will remain on my file for two years. On XX/XX/XXXX to XX/XX/XXXX confirmation # XXXX is not reporting on my report. XX/XX/2019 dispute completed the same day for address removal and name XXXX. On XX/XX/2019 letter received and completed on XX/XX/2019 XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
it was confirmed that money was wired to Lending Club account at XXXX. In addition to that 1
it was created. 1
it was damage that required repair and thats why I have insurance. Frankly 1
it was declined by the XX/XX/XXXX. '' Without notice ( no calls or written correspondence regarding the hurricane deferment )!! 1
it was declined. 2
it was deemed unsafe to travel. 1
it was delivered to my house when I was not home on XX/XX/XXXX 1
it was designed to exploit vulnerable users and drive compulsive spending. This has caused me severe financial hardship 1
it was determined it was not applied towards the principle balance. The payment was applied towards interest 1
it was determined that my employer had placed responsibility on the previous insurance XXXX because my employer did not document my XXXX injury. Employers coverage expired on XXXX XXXX 1
it was determined that my work qualified for the PSLF program 1
it was determined that no investigation had ever been done at all. They have the ability to look this up. Equifax is conducting sham investigations and misrepresent that they actually did an investigation. Inaccuracies remain on the account because of this misconduct. This misconduct is constant and results in tens of thousands of complaints to the CFPB against Equifax 1
it was determined that the vehicle requires a new transmission. As of XX/XX/XXXX 1
it was determined that there is no proof I made the charges 1
it was discovered that Wells Fargo had fraudulently opened deposit accounts in consumers names without knowledge or consent. Wells Fargo continued this activity despite the consent order being in place as documented by a fraudulent account opened in my name in XXXX. The account is question was one of the accounts involved in remediation and Wells Fargo attempted to conceal this account from me in an attempt to coverup their illegal activities. 1
it was discovered that your prior payments were processed via a checking account ending in XXXX. We have confirmed that the late payment for XX/XX/XXXX resulted from your payment being returned by your financial institution as opposed to any software issues on our part. On XX/XX/XXXX 2
it was done as a direct payment using my card 1
it was done by someone else. I am crying and really worried about this problem and need the CFPB to help me investigate further along with Chase to get my money back. It was already reversed but the mail said they will deduct the amount that was reversed on or after XX/XX/year>. I figured CFPB will help me solve this so I contacted as soon as possible. Thank you so much and greatly appreciate the help.,,JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.,NY,11357,,Consent provided,Web,2024-07-27,Closed with monetary relief,Yes,N/A,9637989 1
it was done over the weekend 1
it was duly viewed as a successful transaction on my account by the specialist. Thus 1
it was easier to believe that I had suddenly completely stopped being the responsible person I had a history of being and just I dont know goofed off? I guess I wasnt the only naive one around. 1
It was established that there were 2 transactions that I knew were ours 1
it was evident from my online banking statements that the scammer attempted to use my card multiple times at the same location 1
it was Experian ( the credit agencies '' ). When I ask Experian 1
it was factually impossible because of moral turpitude and a severe lack of professionalism within the senior account management team. 1
it was false and with an intent to induce a contract within For the foregoing reasons 1
it was for him. 1
it was found that they did not prepare a complete list of the fraud on this account 1
it was fraud 1
it was from the same number that I get my other Wells Fargo push notifications from so this convinced me that it was actually Wells Fargo. They stated I would need to send a XXXX under the name of XXXX XXXX 's so they could start a fraud investigation. Once I sent the XXXX 1
it was having BofA FIX THEIR MISTAKE OF DEPOSITING FUNDS TO A WRONG ACCOUNT. And if the phone number matched the account.. why did my mom receive the text message but not the funds? 1
it was immediately evident we had been misled. 1
it was impossible for me to know whether or how my payments would be allocated. I continued to make monthly payments of {$450.00} 1
it was in detail 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter I that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related