2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: W

Companies starting with W that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

8.9K companies starting with "W"

Showing 4.8K–4.8K of 8.9K

Company Complaints
which isn't necessary for the legitimate company. 1
which isn't possible unless they had a permissible purpose 2
which isn't possible. I spoke to one of their customer service agents in early XXXX and she told me that they lock the bank details on the website when there are any unpaid fees 1
which isn't true. I saw this option offered to me before I talked to a customer care and when I tried to go back into my account to pay via debt card it was removed. I open my account on a different device and saw this option. I sent a screenshot of this to Upgrade to show them they do offer this type of payment. Upgrade is giving me a hard time and I don't understand why. I also know you charges late fees 1
which isnt enough proof to validate a fraudulent debt. 1
which issue reports for the purpose of preventing or investigating fraud.,,EQUIFAX 1
which issue reports for the purpose of preventing or investigating fraud.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,TX,77504,,Consent provided,Web,2025-07-22,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,14809086 1
which issue reports for the purpose of preventing or investigating fraud.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
which it clearly wasn't since I was misinformed from the start. 1
which it failed to do. 2
which it has determined arbitrarily. 1
which it has held for more than XXXX years during my time as my XXXX 's caretaker. I have repeatedly requested information 1
which it is not according to Arizona date of filing law. We filed a claim with the Arizona Department of Financial Institutions. They said we have a very good case for a civil lawsuit. We consulted four different attorneys and hired XXXX XXXX XXXX 3
which it is not according to Arizona date of filing law. We filed a claim with the XX/XX/XXXXXXXX XXXX. They said we have a very good case for a civil lawsuit. We consulted four different attorneys and hired XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
which it is not. 3
which it never was. 1
which it said would take around 30 days. I was then pushed to a sales representative and opened a new checking account ( ending with XXXX ). The bank lied to me that the process will be short 1
which it shouldn't/would n't be if they had properly taken the payment f {$8800.00} that They received on XX/XX/XXXX 1
which it was approved. In other words 1
which it was not 1
which it was not necessary if the lender would have enter the correct amount. This could've had detrimental consequences for me if I couldn't made that payment increase 1
which it was not. I could only transfer funds into not take away and that is it. My daughter and I both understand this to be the case. Angry at the discrepancy the phone rep alerted me to 1
which it was not. It provided no immediate assistance for tendering payment. 1
which it was. I received a payment confirmation. 1
which it was. I was shaking and scared for the entire rest of the day 1
which it would have had my number not been compromised and/or if I were employed. At that point 1
which its clear 1
which Ive attached proof of specifically 1
which Ive been told will be returned by check. 1
which just as the credit card 1
which justify their decision not to provide the required information. In my opinion 1
which kept the card open when it was supposedly paid in full and closed. If you feel the need to dig out whose fault this was 1
which lack any permissible purpose or verifiable authorization from me. These inquiries include multiple repeated pulls within short time frames from entities such as Ally Financial 2
which lasted approximately 45 minutes 1
which later turned to email. During one of these conversations 2
which lead me nowhere but at the mercy of XXXX. Legal aid denied my pleas for assistance 1
which leads me to believe they are discriminating against me for some reason. I have yet to hear from the supervisor who said he would call me back 1
which leads me to believe they blocked my number. This was final straw which made me file this complaint 1
which leads me to believe this fraud was done in concert between the two parties.,,MECHANICS BANK,CA,94582,Older American,Consent provided,Web,2021-01-29,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,4103568 1
which leads to an automatic disconnect as soon as they inform me they are recording 1
which leaves capital one in direct violation of federal law and breaching their very own cardholder agreement. Capital one has been advised to submit a release to my email in order to avoid legal action along with the requested amount to release Capital one deposited into my 360 checking account ending in XXXX by XX/XX/XXXX. 1
which leaves people vulnerable to having inaccurate and false information placed on their credit report. As a victim of identity theft 1
which leaves raised hardware exposed on top of the boxes. The latches and lock for the boxes are not labeled for outdoor use 1
which led me here. 1
which led me to believe they tried processing it again and it went through. This all started 2 days after my XX/XX/2020 payment was due. That payment would be 30+ days past due is paid on or after XX/XX/2020. Wells Fargo confirmation letter was dated XX/XX/2020 and my check was cashed XX/XX/2020. All done before the 30 day mark. Unfortunately 1
which led me to believe XXXX was actually there at the house. 1
which led me to transfer my accounts to XXXX. 1
which led Medicare to process it as such. 1
which led to a reported past-due status. 1
which led to billions of dollars in financial harm and 2

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter W that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related