2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: W

Companies starting with W that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

8.9K companies starting with "W"

Showing 8.0K–8.1K of 8.9K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
with one exception. On XX/XX/XXXX 1
with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases 1
with one late which shows as a derogatory mark on our credit. And they flat out refuse to report our home equity line at all. 1
with one of the 60 % of employers who check your credit before they hire you. I will continue to make my monthly payments to them but I want those XXXX missed payments removed from my credit so I can have a financial future again.,,Navient Solutions 1
with one of their employees telling them that I was FULLY VERIFIED and they couldn't have cared less.. And so guess what the people on the phone did? THEY HUNG UP ON BOTH MYSELF AND THE PERSONALBANKER who was working with me!! 1
with one side claiming that they approved a chargeback 2
with only {$160.00} credited toward the loan amount principle. Please see documentation attached showing {$4700.00} payment received by ACT crediting at a rate of 75 % toward interest. A letter I received from ACT dated XX/XX/18 indicating interest was supposed to be at 4.133.63 % 1
with or without cause 1
with or without interest or other charges described in the promise or order 1
with or without notice. None of these responses identified a specific contractual provision 1
with order tracking. Equifax received my dispute 1
with original terms averaging 45 months. The {$1200.00} loan extended to XXXX XXXX XXXX was pooled as collateral backing registered securities sold to institutional investors under false representations that the underlying credit scoring infrastructure was lawfully derived and that the collateral loans were valid 1
WITH OTHER CREDITORS. I AM REQUESTING THAT THE INACCURATE REPORTING BE CORRECTED 1
with others to be forwarded to the account. With the neglect and sheer incompetency of this bank 1
with our credit rating 1
with our loans consolidated with a new term and interest rate. 2
WITH OUT MY WRITTEN INSTRUCTION! IF YOU HAVE MY WRITTEN INSTRUCTION PLEASE PRESENT IT TO ME! ALONG WITH EVERYTHING ELSE IN YOUR FILES TO VALIDATE THESE ACCOUNTS ( listed below ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Transunion you have 30 days to provide me with this information! In the meantime your neglected actions constitutes as FRAUD 1
WITH OUT MY WRITTEN INSTRUCTION! IF YOU HAVE MY WRITTEN INSTRUCTION PLEASE PRESENT IT TO ME! ALONG WITH EVERYTHING ELSE IN YOUR FILES TO VALIDATE THESE ACCOUNTS ( listed below ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Transunion you have 30 days to provide me with this information! In the meantime your neglected actions constitutes as FRAUD 1
WITH OUT MY WRITTEN INSTRUCTION! IF YOU HAVE MY WRITTEN INSTRUCTION PLEASE PRESENT IT TO ME! ALONG WITH EVERYTHING ELSE IN YOUR FILES TO VALIDATE THESE ACCOUNTS ( listed below XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Transunion you have 30 days to provide me with this information! In the meantime your neglected actions constitutes as FRAUD 1
with over {$2000.00} lost.,Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,RESIDENTIAL HOME FUNDING CORP.,NJ,078XX,,Consent provided,Web,2016-10-12,Closed with explanation,Yes,Yes,2157224 1
with particularity 1
with payments made consistently during the disputed period. There is no substantiated evidence provided to validate this delinquency claim. A thorough reinvestigation and verification from the creditor should reveal that this late payment entry lacks proper documentation and should therefore be corrected to reflect the accurate standing of the account. 2
with PayPal claiming I did not provide valid proof of tracking that I had returned the device. 1
with people granted the right to review what was documented with their name 4
with photographic documentation. 1
with point purchase cost of {$1600.00}. XXXX recommended that we float the rate. I did not understand what we meant by this 1
with police in my home 1
with potential damages due to me for violations of the Rosenthal Act 1
with privacy information 1
with profits shared between the two corporations. 2
with profits shared between the two corporations. This agreement formalized the mechanism for mass consumer scoring 3
with profits shared between the XXXX corporations. This agreement formalized the mechanism for mass consumer scoring 3
with promised structured mentorship '' limited to infrequent XXXX XXXX & XXXX and generic assignment feedbackfar short of the personalized career support advertised. Red flags emerged early : the program has long been under fire for unmet promises 1
with promises of a callback. I have been waiting for a callback for 2 weeks -- just from my most recent inquiry. 1
with proof and fair notice of identity theft and that they are reporting fraud on my credit report 1
with proof of receipt at the time. Months later 2
with provisional credits made to my account in the total amount of {$1000.00} on XX/XX/XXXX. 1
with questions about a letter I received stating the funds had been sent to XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Receiver Bank ) . I asked the status of the funds. After a lengthy time on hold 1
with real proof 1
with reasonable grounds to believe that it is the intention of that person to use the money or property so advanced directly or indirectly for the purpose of making extortionate extensions of credit 5
with reasons including the approaching foreclosure sale 1
with regard to my confidentiality as a consumer. 2
with regard to the confidentiality 43
with regard to the CONFIDENTIALITY 3
with regard to this appeal. The subject line of the email reads : # XXXX XXXX VA denial ( there is either no body of this email or it was removed in this document ) 1
with related XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX fees appearing on the same dates. 1
with Relay Financial persisting in their demands for additional documentation 1
with rental records to show this ). 2
with repeated documents requests. They continued to extend the date for their decision 1
with reports in XXXX of XXXX stating the program is still paused with no expected resumption date. '' This service that XXXX XXXX XXXX promised all of us was completely impossible to fulfill. Also 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter W that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →