Total complaints
1
Filed since Fina
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Fina. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since Fina
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| the bogus interest charges of {$880.00} are illegal under California for a variety of reasons. This debt does not involve a loan | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| but very recently filed for bankruptcy protection within two weeks of its owner XXXX being compelled to appear in Court to answer questions about his own assets in order to collect the judgments in lawsuits against the company. Interestingly | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| which the applied interest rate would exceed in any event. Nor does this debt involve a purchase of goods or services on a contract which would permit the collection of interest subject to the debt collector 's having proven that such fees were both reasonable and necessarily incurred. Nor is this alleged debt even reduced to judgment | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 0 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Fina, and the most recent logged activity is Finally, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "the bogus interest charges of {$880.00} are illegal under California for a variety of reasons. This debt does not involve a loan", and the single most common underlying issue is "which the applied interest rate would exceed in any event. Nor does this debt involve a purchase of goods or services on a contract which would permit the collection of interest subject to the debt collector 's having proven that such fees were both reasonable and necessarily incurred. Nor is this alleged debt even reduced to judgment".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases is "which the applied interest rate would exceed in any event. Nor does this debt involve a purchase of goods or services on a contract which would permit the collection of interest subject to the debt collector 's having proven that such fees were both reasonable and necessarily incurred. Nor is this alleged debt even reduced to judgment" in the "the bogus interest charges of {$880.00} are illegal under California for a variety of reasons. This debt does not involve a loan" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.