2026 data Public-data reference. official source

with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Fina. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
Fina
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since Fina

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). the bogus: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% the bogus 100.0%
  • the bogus 1 100.0% 0% relief

How with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
the bogus interest charges of {$880.00} are illegal under California for a variety of reasons. This debt does not involve a loan 1

Top States

State Complaints
but very recently filed for bankruptcy protection within two weeks of its owner XXXX being compelled to appear in Court to answer questions about his own assets in order to collect the judgments in lawsuits against the company. Interestingly 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
which the applied interest rate would exceed in any event. Nor does this debt involve a purchase of goods or services on a contract which would permit the collection of interest subject to the debt collector 's having proven that such fees were both reasonable and necessarily incurred. Nor is this alleged debt even reduced to judgment 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases

with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 0 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Fina, and the most recent logged activity is Finally, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "the bogus interest charges of {$880.00} are illegal under California for a variety of reasons. This debt does not involve a loan", and the single most common underlying issue is "which the applied interest rate would exceed in any event. Nor does this debt involve a purchase of goods or services on a contract which would permit the collection of interest subject to the debt collector 's having proven that such fees were both reasonable and necessarily incurred. Nor is this alleged debt even reduced to judgment".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases have?

with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases respond to complaints on time?

with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases?

The most common issue reported against with one federal court noting that this collector is not properly licensed. This debt collector not only lost these cases is "which the applied interest rate would exceed in any event. Nor does this debt involve a purchase of goods or services on a contract which would permit the collection of interest subject to the debt collector 's having proven that such fees were both reasonable and necessarily incurred. Nor is this alleged debt even reduced to judgment" in the "the bogus interest charges of {$880.00} are illegal under California for a variety of reasons. This debt does not involve a loan" product category.

Related