2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: W

Companies starting with W that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

8.9K companies starting with "W"

Showing 6.0K–6.0K of 8.9K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
which was immediately resolved and never resulted in a delinquent balance. 1
which was implemented to address improper servicing 1
which was impossible to achieve. XXXX XXXX further stated that she reached out to me on Friday 1
which was in fact a link to confirm the transfer request. This was the first violation 1
which was incorporated with the Department of State of Delaware on XXXX XXXX 1
which was incorrect. The rep also asked for my individual income on my XXXX ; this is not something that appears on a XXXX when a couple is married filing jointly. The XXXX is all that we are required to provide 1
which was indicated at the bottom of the record through XXXX 's personal handwriting that also stated finance rate increased '' as to the reason the GAP was removed. I told him that was not the final deal we signed 1
which was inside of a large travel suitcase. 1
which was insufficient to remove PMI from my loan. I submitted an appeal with XXXX comparable homes and a recent home sale in my neighborhood 1
which was intended as the first settlement payment 1
which was issued on XX/XX/XXXX. I believe the wage garnishment process was unfairly pursued without consideration of my financial circumstances or a meaningful effort to resolve the matter outside of court. 1
which was justified by the false statement that the shipment would come from XXXX 1
which was last Tuesday. I was shocked 1
which was later acquired by XXXX XXXX Bank and subsequently by Old National Bank. 1
which was later dismissed by another associate. 1
which was less than the original amount I paid. I later contacted Coinbase asking for clarification on their refund policy 1
which was located in XXXXXXXX XXXX I pointed out that this activity took place in Illinois 1
which was malfunctioning through no fault of mine. 1
which was mandated from their Legal Department. 1
which was manipulative and designed get me to accept the courtesy credit and not give me the rest of the amount. 1
which was materially higher than the market average at the time. [ See Lender email on discount points.pdf '' ] We closed the loan with Supreme Lending. In XXXX 1
which was my new account # ending in XXXX with the {$45.00} authorized credit card payment available for Continental Finance to take. Yet 1
which was my payment under income-based repayment and the same amount I paid from XX/XX/XXXXwith the previous servicer. This payment should count toward PSLF and Fed Loan Servicing is not doing this. 1
which was my plan from the beginning because a home loan would involve a lower interest rate and save me approximately {$60000.00} in interest over the lifespan of the loan. He explicitly stated that he asked their underwriter to be sure the information he was giving me was accurate and verified that the underwriter confirmed the information he provided. 1
which was never disclosed in the original lease or any documentation I received. 1
which was not acceptable to me. During my conversation with one of the rep 's 1
which was not advised to me when I called each branch prior to arrival. Note that none of the inept and grossly unprofessional representatives at any of these locations offered to run the check 1
which was not allowed under the bankruptcy laws. My credit report currently shows XXXX instances of late payment on this mortgage during our bankruptcy 1
which was not authorized XXXXXXXX XXXX inquiry dated XX/XX/XXXX 1
which was not cashed. Unless otherwise expressed in simple math countering the above breakdown 1
which was not disclosed when I signed up for the service and is effectively anti-competitive. On top of this 1
which was not disputed by either and their exact involvement and non-involvement of this particular dispute matter. Equifaxs Legal Department has been notified of all violation so upon receipt of this CFPB complaint 1
which was not done here. 1
which was not enough.,Company chooses not to provide a public response,U.S. BANCORP,GA,30340,,Consent provided,Web,2015-06-28,Closed with explanation,Yes,No,1441727 1
which was not feasible to complete in a single day 1
which was not given to me when this case was opened 1
which was not included. Once I contacted him with my concerns 1
which was not made clear at the time of receiving the court summons. 1
which was not made during the trial forbearance period. ( paraphrased ). Be advised 1
which was not mentioned during my first call. After I submitted the application 1
which was not my fault. 1
which was not my request. I asked the agent who gave me the update 1
which was not obtained for any of the above. 1
which was not the case. 3
which was not the case. They told me there was nothing I could do. When I initially called Barclays about this dispute 1
which was NOT the XXXX order at all. 1
which was not true according to PayPal. 1
which was not valid. My loan had been transferred to another lender : XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
which was nothing due to their error with double billing 1
which was now over a month old 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter W that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →