Total complaints
1
Filed since XXXX
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows which was nothing due to their error with double billing's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since XXXX. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since XXXX
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How which was nothing due to their error with double billing's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| I was being billed by both company. This went on for months. It was only after I decided to close my account that they somehow figured it out. I presumed the issues was resolved and as I no longer received duplicate charges. However | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| which is a clear violation of [ 15 USC 1692e ] 807 ( 2 ) ( a ). I am consulting with a law firm of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX to see a civil legal action due to FDCPA and TCPA. Diversified has added on additional amounts due by still reflect this as due | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| both state the debt should not be on my credit. However | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
which was nothing due to their error with double billing has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to XXXX, and the most recent logged activity is XXXX XXXX , giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, which was nothing due to their error with double billing reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "I was being billed by both company. This went on for months. It was only after I decided to close my account that they somehow figured it out. I presumed the issues was resolved and as I no longer received duplicate charges. However", and the single most common underlying issue is "both state the debt should not be on my credit. However".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating which was nothing due to their error with double billing: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
which was nothing due to their error with double billing has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
which was nothing due to their error with double billing has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against which was nothing due to their error with double billing is "both state the debt should not be on my credit. However" in the "I was being billed by both company. This went on for months. It was only after I decided to close my account that they somehow figured it out. I presumed the issues was resolved and as I no longer received duplicate charges. However" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.