2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 4.2K–4.3K of 13.5K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
the issues reappeared the very next day. After multiple unsuccessful attempts to resolve these problems 1
the issues remain unresolved. I have never been able to speak with a supervisor despite repeated requests.,,Fay Servicing 1
the item I ordered weighs 8.15 lbs 1
the item must be deleted immediately under FCRA 2
the item must be deleted INSTRUCTION : I demand the removal of this item if verification can not be supplied directly by XXXX with complete payment and charge off history ACCOUNT : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$0.00} Charge Off * * LAW ISSUE : FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) entitles consumers to dispute information believed to be inaccurate. 1681s-2 ( b ) requires furnishers to verify or correct disputed data DISPUTE STORY : This entry is a duplicate and appears to be a secondary reporting of the XXXX account already disputed. It is impacting my score unfairly. No legal validation has been provided INSTRUCTION : Please delete this account as it is a duplicate and unverifiable. If you can not confirm its legitimacy with dated statements or contractual agreement 1
the item must be removed immediately. 2
the item must be removed. The repeated failure to provide proper verification has caused financial harm 1
the item remains on my credit bureau file and they have sent correspondence of their refusal to investigate this violation. 2
the item wasn't received. The second time 1
the itemization of payments should mirror the finance charge amount as it is the dollar amount the credit will cost me. As another reference to the finance charge 1
The itemized amount owed 2
the itemized list they provided included two damages for which they failed to provide any proof 1
the items must be deleted from the report as soon as possible According to 15 U.S. Code 1692j 1
the items must be deleted from the report as soon as possible. 29
the items must be deleted from the report as soon as possible. Under federal law. Please research and delete the inaccuracies ASAP. In the past I have received your computer-generated letter stating that you have ceased investigation of my credit reports because 2
the items must be deleted immediately.,,Phoenix Financial Services LLC,PA,19604,,Consent provided,Web,2021-08-11,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,4622008 1
the items must be permanently deleted. 3
the items purchased 2
the items should be deleted from my credit report. 1
the items were damaged and open and not in new sealed conditions 1
the items were not as described 1
the J column indicated the amount over or under that Wells Fargo has posted. Note beginning on page XXXX 1
The J. G. Wentworth Company 205
THE J.D. STUART LAW GROUP, LLC 4
the joy and brightest light in my life 1
the judge 's and the tax payer 's time and money. And 1
the judge has no other alternative to dismiss the case. In order for the instrument to be fixed 1
the judge in my legal case ruled that I can not pursue a case against XXXX since they don't actually exist. 1
THE JUDGE LAW FIRM, A LAW CORPORATION 1
the judgment and summons to garnish my wages should be removed. I firmly believe Wells Fargo has punished me more than {$9000.00} worth and that they should be punished and fined for this unfair treatment or more like harassment!,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,GA,30041,,Consent provided,Web,2020-04-17,Closed with monetary relief,Yes,N/A,3610987 1
the judgment and summons to garnish my wages should be removed. I firmly believe XXXX XXXX has punished me more than {$9000.00} worth and that they should be punished and fined for this unfair treatment or more like harassment!,Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,Lefkoff 1
The Judgment Group 7
the judgment was substituted to the law offices of Robert J Colclough III 1
the jury returned a verdict finding that XXXX & XXXX had intentionally violated its duties under FCRA. The jury awarded XXXX no compensatory damages but did award the maximum possible statutory damages of {$1000.00} and punitive damages of {$80000.00}. WOW!!! This means that the failure of a Furnisher to report a DISPUTE on a consumers credit report could result in statutory damages of {$1000.00} plus punitive damages of {$80000.00}. Failure to list my account as dispute 1
the jury returned a verdict finding that XXXX XXXX XXXX had intentionally violated its duties under FCRA. The jury awarded XXXX no compensatory damages but did award the maximum possible statutory damages of {$1000.00} and punitive damages of {$80000.00}. WOW!!! This means that the failure of a Furnisher to report a DISPUTE on a consumers credit report could result in statutory damages of {$1000.00} plus punitive damages of {$80000.00}. Failure to list my account as dispute 1
the jury returned a verdict finding that XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX had intentionally violated its duties under FCRA. The jury awarded Saunders no compensatory damages but did award the maximum possible statutory damages of {$1000.00} and punitive damages of {$80000.00}. WOW!!! This means that the failure of a Furnisher to report a DISPUTE on a consumers credit report could result in statutory damages of {$1000.00} plus punitive damages of {$80000.00}. Failure to list my account as dispute 1
the kid may soon be in the street in his XXXX. I have filed several complaints here but I am not able to scan and attach documents. I 'm no computer whiz. Just spent an entire week delving through a foot high stack of inconsistent and fabricated documents from Ocwen 1
the Kraken responded they were unable to assist further due to different regulatory obstacles. 1
the lack of appropriate validation 1
the lack of communication and the fact that they had incorrect information about my current mortgage payment history. I also left them both phone messages on that day. I did not receive any type of response from either of them. 1
the lack of exposure to a competitive market under a normal marketing or sales process. Under a Sold Before Processing or Pocket Sale 1
the lack of honesty of Nissan in what 2 months extension '' truly meant 1
the lack of knowledge and compliance of specific requirements agreed to under the Bank of America and the Department of Justice and States Attorney General related to and raising from the mortgage crisis and disstressed borrowers. 1
the lack of proper communication 1
the lack of reference numbers reduces the companys exposure to legal or regulatory scrutiny 1
the lack of responsiveness and clear communication from Capital One throughout this process directly contributed to the unjust closure of my dispute. 1
the lack of training of the Customer Service reps and the omissions of where and to whom I needed to make the payment arrangement with and by what time. This is all after the fact. These are clearly errors but she would not acknowledge it as such. It felt as if she was trained not to acknowledge wrong doing because such an admission would require actual escalation and the reopening of a closed account. We concluded the conversation with XXXX escalating the issue for a second review which should could not guarantee would escalate to Tier 3 1
the lack thereof would serve to prove : 1 ) the debt PRA has alleged I owe is invalid ; and 1
the lack thereof would serve to prove : 1 ) the debt SYNCB has alleged I owe is invalid ; and 1
the lady I talk to did not give me explanation of how they keep selling my account to people even outside of the country. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →