2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 8.6K–8.6K of 13.5K

Company Complaints
they had deemed the charge legitimate. 1
they had determined that the transaction was valid. 1
they had determined that the {$28000.00} transfer was not unauthorized '' 1
they had done no wrong. It was my problem! 1
they had dropped the ball on our timeline 1
they had FALSELY claimed my account had some fraudulent activity 1
they had found no indications of fraud ''. They then stated that the {$180.00} in fraudulent charges was my responsibility 1
they had informed me that when this was adjusted that the next steps would be to work with the credit bureau to make the adjustments to both my balance as well as the delinquency status that was reported. 1
they had made every dispute procedure into a XXXX 1
they had me make a payroll deduction 1
they had me sign on a tablet or phone 1
they had my correct address. I have had no further contact from Ally. The charge has still not been reverse. My orders page at XXXX has been scrubbed but I screenshotted the page prior to scrubbing. 1
they had my correct mailing address for many years and obviously the new owner did n't return the first checks 1
they had my live debit card in their hands 1
they had my phone number. I never once had a call from XXXX asking me for this money. In fact 1
they had my vehicle repossessed. While the company was there 1
they had no answer of what the breakdown of fees was for and directed us to call the new law firm XXXX 2
they had no answer why bank would return after accepting 1
they had no business using her information against me. XXXX XXXX falsified documents stating that the decision letter was mailed to me on the XX/XX/XXXX 1
they had no interest in helping us or wanting to know what happened. I am XXXX years old 1
they had no other alternative but to come in person. I asked if I could speak to a manager 1
they had no service for either company. I spent five hours on the phone with XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX on Saturday 1
they had not received it. We had proof it was sent. XXXX XXXX called US Bank Mortgage Assistance and sent documents sent again Called US Bank Mortgage Assistance on XXXX XXXX to inquire as to status. Reply in process Called US Bank Mortgage Assistance on XXXX XXXX inquire as to status. Reply in process and it would be about 30 days XXXX XXXX XXXX it was longer than 30 days we place a call to US Bank Mortgage Assistance and they had lost our Mortgage Assistance Packet so we emailed a copy to Mortgage Assistance XXXX and XXXX calls where made again on status of the modification request. No status on a decision. XXXX XXXX XXXX packet lost again by Mortgage Assistance and resent completed packet to US Bank Mortgage Assistance XXXX XXXX XXXX US Bank Mortgage Assistance confirming the copy of documents was received and up loaded. She confirmed they where received an emailed me stating that the information has been up loaded. From XXXX XXXX XXXX until XXXX XXXX 1
they had only considered the documents the merchant provided to them showing that a transaction was carried out in a valid way. They completely negated the main reason why I filed the dispute in the first place ; which is THE MERCHANDISE I RECEIVED FROM XXXX WAS IRREPARABLE AND NOT AS DESCRIBED ''. While still on the call 1
they had outright denied the application on technical grounds. All of this clearly violates my rights to clear and fair lending as a student borrower.,,Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority,MA,01604,,Consent provided,Web,2016-01-10,Closed with explanation,Yes,No,1735403 1
they had paused the underwriting process to ask for documents they already had and documents that did not exist. Why would they wait until over two months after we submitted our application to request these documents? 1
they had reduced that bill and created another problem for me by sending {$140.00} in collection without any communication via email or mail what so ever. 1
they had sent a check to westlake financial group and at this point have done what they need to do. According to westlake 1
they had someone call me 1
they had still made for an erroneous decision to report the medical debt to all three major Credit Bureaus though in end result of my disputes 1
they had taken an application 1
they had taken the remittance back. This was done BECAUSE I HAD notified SS of her death. How can this bank claim to be unaware of her death when they received not 1 1
they had the responsibility to change it to their name once I surrendered possession back to them. 1
they had the right and obligation to intervene or release the vehicle. Instead 1
they had the right to take monies from my personal primary checking account to settle the overdraft. NFCU will not at all acknowledge that this overdraft was due to their own negligence and they allowed the account to be overdrawn by some unknown actor via a fraudulent deposit. They did inform me that they only were able to flag the deposit but did not catch it in time to stop the subsequent transfers or withdrawals. NFCU allowed perpetuation of this fraudulent deposit to result in significant overdraft ( s ) and then abused their privilege to my separate primary checking account to resolve it. 1
they had the wrong person 1
they had their own inspector come out and personally inspect the repairs. These people have more than enough information to make sure that their financial interests are adequately protected. Obviously 1
they had to direct me to a single page 1
they had to mail a physical check to XXXX. XXXX notates for customers on their online banking page with an icon next to the payment 1
they had told me that there was a new policy stating that the whole past due amount ( totaling appx. 5000.00 dollars ) would need to be paid. Furthermore 1
they hadn't been done yet 1
they hadn't paid off my balance on XXXX XXXX 1
they handle them all ( paraphrasing ). 1
they hang up on me 1
they hang up on people 1
they have 1
they have 14 days to process the transactions. 1
they have 226 reviews on https : XXXX ( they have a 1.3 star rating on this due to their illegal and discriminatory practices ) 1
they have : Failed to conduct a reasonable investigation into my dispute as required under FCRA. 1
they have a check from the insurance company for most of the loan 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related