2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 8.5K–8.5K of 13.5K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
they dont have time 1
they dont know. 1
they dont make you aware of it until after you realize it and have problems 1
they dont seem to want to consider. My question to them is why not? We would accept a lesser modification determination 1
they dropped it from my account. I think that Bank of America should have done the same 1
they effectively defrauded us of the interest on those funds over this ten-day period.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,BANK OF AMERICA 1
they effectively prevented consumers from being able to meet the said requirements prior to the deadline. I consider this to be highly deceptive marketing practice 1
they either cannot or will not provide a means for me to reach them again forcing me 1
they emailed us saying that the host declined to refund us any money. We asked them to provide any evidence of the communication which they failed to do. They also gave us a number to call the host directly 1
they ended up closing her account and we are still waiting to receive the funds from the bank. Even though her check was deposited and within a day the check cleared the XXXX account 1
they ended up talking me into adding little amounts here and there from XXXX XXXX 1
they erased most of the important email communications 1
they even changed the amount to give the illusion the theft was legitimate. Transunion is unmindful 1
they even denied this compromise. {$6000.00} is the cost of 5 years of the flood policy that we have. They basically stole {$6000.00} from our Escrow. 1
they even employed a lawyer 1
they even gave me a date on when to expect the money. 1
they even manually charged back my account at a merchants request a couple years ago. Well they refused 1
they even refuse to honor the promise of chase phone representative and their own banker XXXX. I was left disheartened by the lack of support and accountability from Chase representatives. 1
They even stole a lug nut off of the front Passenger tire ( a Silver Spike ). My Concerning the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( 37 Chrome wheels and tires ) : It is a safety issue thanks to these irresponsible people who were using my truck for their personal use. As well as damaging my expense XXXX XXXX package installed at AutoPlex located at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
they extended a provisionary credit of {$75.00} for the credit card charge 1
they fabricated the amount outstanding and then later rescinded the messages. 1
they fail and refuse to do so 1
THEY FAIL TO PROVIDE US WITH OPTIONS 1
they failed miserably in all regards. In the end 1
they failed repeatedly ). 2
they failed to come back with anything of substance. 1
they failed to deliver on these promises 1
they failed to point that out anywhere on the statement or indicate it had changed!!!,Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,Shellpoint Partners 1
they failed to prove that they used their own money to fund the credit card account 1
they failed to provide any resolution or follow through on any of their promises. 1
they failed to provide any written documents 1
they failed to provide the appropriate notifications of account changes ; they failed to make available any effective and timely means of intervening or notifying/communicating with Coinbase at all regarding suspicious/fraudulent activity ; they allowed unauthorized access from unauthorized devices that should have required both sides of my driver 's license and live-capture photo of me to authenticate ; they ignored my frantic requests and demands to lockdown my account to protect from further unauthorized activity ; they allowed access and unauthorized transfers to occur with our personal bank account ; they allowed large transactions ( as high as {$15000.00} ) to continue even up to seven days after notifying them of the security breach ; they allowed me to regain full access to my account even after my explicit instructions to block all further activity until I speak with a representative ( which they have ignored entirely ) ; they repeatedly demonstrated through auto-generated emails that they had not paid any attention to my urgent situation ; and 1
they failed to provide this in their documentation to you. A written report and or statement regarding the status of XXXX 's efforts to date 1
they failed to read the maps correctly. Second 1
they failed to see that I have too much available credit the first time around. I don't know what to call this. I am stunned. 1
they failed to take ownership of the system error. As of now 1
they failed to uphold their word and wreaked havoc on my ability to have credit extended to me with any other financial institution because of how poorly my credit report portrays me as. 2
they fallaciously included a copy of a notice of repossession dated XX/XX/XXXX ( Exhibit 3 ) in which I had never received. This was an after the fact vindictive ploy to discredit my name. This is the first that I have ever viewed this document. 1
they falsely claimed : The Bank has not received a formal arbitration notice. 1
they feel that it was called because me interest rate was pretty low. Chase said it was because it was an investment property. My husband and I are out here XXXX hours a week running XXXX companies. I know that a big bank like Chase could care less 1
they filed a form with ilsos to change their name. Serious questions about due process and proper representation in this case. 1
they filed another investigation 1
they finally agreed to allow me to refile a dispute. On XX/XX/XXXX 1
they finally agreed to credit me back the interest that they charged me for the XXXX balance ( that I had already paid in full ) as their way of being courteous. 1
they finally agreed to reimburse me for any additional baggage fees I incurred at the airport. 1
they finally posted the payments to the correct account and resolved it. 1
they finally provided it. The new lender then asked for a Freedom Mortgage memo stating that I was making payments IAW the last known payment amount. After 2 weeks of making that request 1
they finally removed the loan. But then the next month I see these hard hits on my credit from them and after a few phone calls and telling me I deserve this and there 's nothing I can do about this I pretty much gave up hope. This is why I am making this report and complaint 1
they finally said the denial was because XXXX is not a car rental company. Even though XXXX presents itself as a car rental company. The only stipulations mentioned by the policy said Mastercard did not cover work vehicles. Point tried to take any of their part out by saying they had no control over the claims. This stood out as Point advertises these benefits. It is assumed they have some responsibility to the consumer to enforce their advertisements. 1
they finally stopped. More about this later. I spent the rest of my day calling every banking institution that I had a credit card under and replaced all my credit cards and debit cards 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →