2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 8.2K–8.2K of 13.5K

Company Complaints
they charged me. So 1
they charged my credit card the {$79.00}. 1
they charged off my account. This is deeply concerning because their own representative 1
they charged off the debt and continued to report it to the credit bureaus 2
they charged the Citibank credit card for the same book 1
they charged {$1800.00} in interest 1
they chose the predatory route. Chase now claims rate offered going into the modification was 5.4 % 1
they chose to contact property management company XXXX in an attempt to bypass my authority and manipulate the situation to their advantage. 1
they chose to ignore my issue and gave me a word salad of tangent facts. 1
they chose to play games with me. 1
they claim a letter was sent but it never made it into my possession 1
they claim expired due to their mail issues 1
they claim that the issue will take 1-2 days while on the same date with regard to the same issue 1
they claim they are not allowed to check any footage and the atm cameras just take one picture when you insert your card! 1
they claim they are waiting on the seller 1
they claimed again that it was missing a signature. On XX/XX/XXXX 1
they claimed Chase had not transferred any points over. 1
they claimed federal laws prevented them from correcting their error. 2
they claimed it was nothing they could do. I struggled paying it until several months ago when I became 2 months behind. They connected me with their preservation department where they basically had me send all of my financials to them not just my paystubs. They had me send bank statements 1
they claimed that they would look into.I paid that amount. However 1
they claimed the manager hadnt left a note 1
they claimed there was nothing that could be done because it was the past servicer 's records. And when LoanCare was notified of its errors 1
they claimed there was nothing that could be done because it was the past servicer 's records. And when XXXX was notified of its errors 1
they claimed they did not know why it gets printed. This lack of clarity caused confusion about my warranty coverage 1
they claimed they had no way to determine whether the collection account would appear on any credit reports. 1
they claimed they were still checking their accounts for the money and a resolution.,,Kirschenbaum & Phillips P.C,MD,212XX,,Consent provided,Web,2015-09-09,Closed with explanation,Yes,Yes,1556845 1
they claimed they were still checking their accounts for the money and a resolution.,Company chooses not to provide a public response,WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,MD,212XX,,Consent provided,Web,2015-09-09,Closed with monetary relief,Yes,No,1556846 1
they claimed XXXX worth XXXX XXXX on the internet as the creditor stated and I said thats not factual 1
they clam up and state they are unable to release any information. 1
they clearly demonstrated they should not be allowed to handle US citizens money 1
they clearly referenced the transaction ID 1
they closed my account and kept the check. 1
they closed my account. 2
they closed my account. There was no way to request an exception 1
they closed the account within the first month but neglected to investigate further 2
they closed the account without further explanation. 1
they closed the case. Each call after was the same they emailed me and haven't heard a response etc. There was never an email. On the last call of XXXX the person told me there were notes on the file stating they had closed it again due to no response from me. I told them they weren't emailing me and why don't they try to mail the packet. That was two weeks ago and no packet mailed. In addition 1
they closed the matter ( CASE ID - XXXX ) by reapplying the charge to my account (?! ). 1
they closed the same card for me without any explanation and without arguments 1
they closed them. I should not be penalized for not wanting to get more or pay interest on a mortgage when I can afford not to. 1
they come knocking on my door 1
they communicated that they were closing the investigation and that my account was going to be closed. Subsequently 1
they communicated to me that I should call XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX. I did and got a hold of someone who eventually got me to Customer Service who got me to the Refinancing Department on the XXXX XXXX phone line. I spoke with someone from each of these departments for some five to ten minutes or more trying to explain what I knew about what had happened but both he and she that I spoke with got mad at me and sent me back to Customer Service who 1
they completely ignored me 1
they concluded that because some legitimate transactions were made using my laptop between these fraudulent charges 1
they confirmed YES ''. I called again in XXXX 1
they confirmed that my phone was logged in with a face ID when the money was withdrawn. But I can't admit it. As soon as I logged in with my face ID and used my phone ( I use my phone frequently ) 1
they confirmed that the case was actually still open 1
they confirmed that the check was valid 1
they confirmed that the payment was not out of the typical modality. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related