2026 data Public-data reference. official source

they claimed there was nothing that could be done because it was the past servicer 's records. And when XXXX was notified of its errors

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows they claimed there was nothing that could be done because it was the past servicer 's records. And when XXXX was notified of its errors's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Addi. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
Addi
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since Addi

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

they claimed there was nothing that could be done because it was the past servicer 's records. And when XXXX was notified of its errors complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

they claimed there was nothing that could be done because it was the past servicer 's records. And when XXXX was notified of its errors complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). XXXX finally: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% XXXX finally 100.0%
  • XXXX finally 1 100.0% 0% relief

How they claimed there was nothing that could be done because it was the past servicer 's records. And when XXXX was notified of its errors's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
XXXX finally performed another Escrow Analysis that found the Borrower 's escrow account actually contained a surplus however 1

Top States

State Complaints
it claimed there was nothing that could be done since the servicing rights have been transferred to Carrington.,,CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
which was caused by their failure to properly process the modification and conduct an updated escrow analysis in the first place. The most recent escrow analysis conducted by XXXX was dated XX/XX/XXXX and states the monthly mortgage payment for the last year was {$1300.00} however ; XXXX was claiming the Borrowers owed {$1600.00} on the monthly mortgage statements. Then 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About they claimed there was nothing that could be done because it was the past servicer 's records. And when XXXX was notified of its errors

they claimed there was nothing that could be done because it was the past servicer 's records. And when XXXX was notified of its errors has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Addi, and the most recent logged activity is Additional, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, they claimed there was nothing that could be done because it was the past servicer 's records. And when XXXX was notified of its errors reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "XXXX finally performed another Escrow Analysis that found the Borrower 's escrow account actually contained a surplus however", and the single most common underlying issue is "which was caused by their failure to properly process the modification and conduct an updated escrow analysis in the first place. The most recent escrow analysis conducted by XXXX was dated XX/XX/XXXX and states the monthly mortgage payment for the last year was {$1300.00} however ; XXXX was claiming the Borrowers owed {$1600.00} on the monthly mortgage statements. Then".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating they claimed there was nothing that could be done because it was the past servicer 's records. And when XXXX was notified of its errors: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does they claimed there was nothing that could be done because it was the past servicer 's records. And when XXXX was notified of its errors have?

they claimed there was nothing that could be done because it was the past servicer 's records. And when XXXX was notified of its errors has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does they claimed there was nothing that could be done because it was the past servicer 's records. And when XXXX was notified of its errors respond to complaints on time?

they claimed there was nothing that could be done because it was the past servicer 's records. And when XXXX was notified of its errors has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about they claimed there was nothing that could be done because it was the past servicer 's records. And when XXXX was notified of its errors?

The most common issue reported against they claimed there was nothing that could be done because it was the past servicer 's records. And when XXXX was notified of its errors is "which was caused by their failure to properly process the modification and conduct an updated escrow analysis in the first place. The most recent escrow analysis conducted by XXXX was dated XX/XX/XXXX and states the monthly mortgage payment for the last year was {$1300.00} however ; XXXX was claiming the Borrowers owed {$1600.00} on the monthly mortgage statements. Then" in the "XXXX finally performed another Escrow Analysis that found the Borrower 's escrow account actually contained a surplus however" product category.

Related