2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: S

Companies starting with S that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

5.5K companies starting with "S"

Showing 3.8K–3.9K of 5.5K

Company Complaints
solely to confirm the permanent deletion of this account from all consumer reports.Additionally 1
solely with intent to scare 1
Solera 2
SOLERA LLC 6
SOLICIT OR SELL OUR INFORMATION TO ANYONE ELSE! DO NOT REPORT INFORMATION TO ANY OTHER COMPANIES OR INDIVIDUALS EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY!,,LEXISNEXIS,IL,60707,,Consent provided,Web,2020-08-21,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,3806618 1
solicitation calls 1
Solidifi US, Inc. 8
Solidus Group LLC. 227
SoLo Funds Inc. 83
Solomon and Solomon, P.C. 181
solution to eradicating my debt and I am being barred from it. 1
Solutions To Portfolios, LLC 49
solve this issue 1
Solvent Plus LLC 5
Sombrero Capital LLC 13
some argue that this provision applies only to furnishers regulated under Section 623 of the FCRA ( 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ) YOUR COMPANY EXPERIAN violated the FCRA requirements ( 1 ) in 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681e ( b ) for a consumer reporting agency ( CRA ) to assure maximum possible accuracy in its credit reports 1
some argue that this provision applies only to furnishers regulated under Section XXXX of the FCRA ( XXXX U.S.C. XXXX ) YOUR COMPANY EXPERIAN violated XXXX FCRA requirements ( XXXX ) in XXXX U.S.C. Sec. XXXX ( b ) for a consumer reporting agency ( CRA ) to assure maximum possible accuracy in its credit reports 1
some at a small gain. I had to leave {$1000.00} in stocks to continue. I withdrew {$5000.00} from my trading account. I was satisfied that my funds were in my bank account within 48 hours. Perfect situation. I then added these funds to my account with XXXX XXXX 1
some cash advances and minimal payments on this account. They have closed the investigations several times 1
some closed and replaced due to stolen card numbers or fraudulent charges etc. But over those 32 accounts 1
some companies will offer financing IF your mortgage shows a current status. I would have never chosen this company to service my mortgage. My mortgage was transferred to them. They are not XXXX rated and there are XXXX complaints on the XXXX site. Additionally 1
some consumer later find out the process to get the 10 % and they go ahead and allow it to go through XXXX system. However 1
some Credit Reporting Agencies employee [ s ] and [ or ] affiliate [ s ] with a malice aforethought in premeditated criminal intents because I do not conform to XXXX XXXX appearances 1
some Credit Reporting Agencies employee [ s ] and [ or ] affiliate [ s ] with a malice aforethought in premeditated criminal intents because I do not conform to XXXX XX/XX/XXXXappearances 1
some Credit Reporting Agencies employee [ s ] and [ or ] affiliate [ s ] with a malice aforethought in premeditated criminal intents because I do not conform to XXXX XXXX appearances 1
some debt collectors repeatedly request trial continuances 1
some emails from Citibank. 1
some for service tier changes made against my instructions 3
some funds ( about {$200.00} ) would be available the next business day 1
some inaccurate information appeared on my credit reports. 1
some incorrectly cooked and some not served. 1
some indication of the activity on the file. I keep getting an email from XXXX XXXX 1
some information was added on its online banking website 1
some jewelry and accessory items that I ordered were not included in the package. I received other packages over the next few weeks 1
some letter written more than 45 days 2
some little insignificant improvements can become precedents of better customer care. 1
some money will be left for potential medical bills and so we can find a place to rent. Our home is in escrow 1
some of the charges were beyond the time frame for cancelling. I contacted management and was told it was my responsibility to monitor the account ( including the card I had not authorized ). They said they would look into weeks ago 1
some of the customer service representatives were extremely rude and accusatory.,,AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY,NY,10016,,Consent provided,Web,2016-04-28,Closed with explanation,Yes,No,1901990 1
some of the initial changes that they made 3
some of the previous letters from your company asked me to submit the necessary documents for extended alert ; therefore 1
some of these reversals were re-charged as new purchases 1
some of which we didn't know until we were told by USAA after the fact on XX/XX/XXXX. 1
some of which were missing silicone and improperly secured. I contacted XXXX multiple times to request correction or refund 1
some of your AES/PHEAA employees engaged in abusive tones '' with me during conversations and made some disturbing remarks which left me contemplating reaching out to law enforcement. 1
some procedures might have changed 1
some resisted transferring my call to supervisors and once transferred 1
some restructuring is in order 1
some six months after the debt had settled. In effect 1
some sort of monetary gain or goods. This is also a violation of 18 usc 1028 a LII U.S. Code Title 18 PART I CHAPTER 47 1028A Quick search by citation : Title enter title Section section 18 U.S. Code 1028A - Aggravated identity theft U.S. Code Notes prev | next ( a ) Offenses. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter S that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related