2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: W

Companies starting with W that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

8.9K companies starting with "W"

Showing 251–300 of 8.9K

Company Complaints
was never fixed correctly on my credit report 1
was never informed that I entered foreclosure. I later learned that Flagstar reported entering foreclosure to the credit bureaus in XX/XX/XXXX. That was after the payment was made in full to bring the account to current. It was explained to me by Flagstar agents that the inspection fee was to pay for someone to see if the house was vacant. Someone was sent on four separate occasions 1
was never posted to the reservation 1
was not acceptable. I am extremely upset. I filed a complaint with the Attorney General of the State of Texas that I believed I was being discriminated against because I was a woman and a small business owner. 1
was not an MBS loansee the online responses to those complaints. 1
was not at his desk so she couldn't transfer me. I asked her to leave XXXX a message that I would like a phone call from him within 24 hrs. I also asked XXXX to put into my file that I was going to contact CFPB. 1
was not clearly or correctly reflected in my statements 1
was not duly rendered. 1
was not enough to be treated with basic dignity and respect. At no point did XXXX ever just do what they said they would and charge me $XXXX a month. Their billing practices are so predatory that even 3 months after my phone was stolen XXXX was still charging me full price for a plan and adding carry over charges from after the phone no longer worked! How XXXX can justify billing me more than $XXXX a month for a phone number and cell phone I cant even use is beyond reason. 1
was not good. I had never requested deferments and I was making sufficient monthly payments in a timely manner. So 1
was not helpful at all 1
was not helpful. She told me that I needed to go online to make an appointment to see a banker at her branch. I told her what had happened and she was not in the least bit concerned. Finally 1
was not included in that list and 1
was not listed in my master policy. I asked them to explain walls in insurance as I had never heard of that type of insurance. At NO TIME 1
was NOT notified on their online system ; no email 1
was not opened by me or any one in my household. I had absolutely no knowledge of this account 3
was not part of the loan agreement. On XXXX XXXX 1
was not properly educated or guided through the loan process. Sallie Mae approved the loan despite our lack of financial literacy and did not ensure that we both understood what we were agreeing to. Sallie Mae never reached out to me to educate me or even give permission. 1
was not provided anything XX/XX/XXXX XXXX 51 mins Called escrow dept myself to inquire whether they received the approval to credit back my account 1
was not received as anything sent to old address would not be forwarded. Since no agreement received 1
was not registered or authorized to do business in the State of Tennessee at the time the Deed of Trust was executed 1
was not reported an in dispute. Experian has ignored the accuracy component of the FCRA Section 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) for the missing data ; FCRA 623 ( b ) ( 2 ) and the 30 day provision of the FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 1 ). No answers are provided to me by Experian in regards to this dispute and am simply given a one line response 2
was not sufficient and thatI needed some other type of documentation. A significant amount of time was spent having me re- sendthe same document over and over just to have it rejected numerous times. An example of this was the XXXX application that I submitted several times via their email site and also subsequently by fax. Besides 1
was not sufficient proof of change of address. I responded that my other transactions are unrelated and irrelevant 1
was not the issue anyway. Again 1
was not to be the end of the nightmare. 1
was not to provide for cooperation by the Federal Government with the several States and Territories and the District of Columbia in relieving the hardship and suffering caused by ( Sec. 4. ( a ) ) Out of the funds to provide the necessities of life to persons in need as a result of the present emergency 1
was not used 1
was not utilized as a profit-loss tax deduction during the period it may have been payable 7
was not verifiable. 1
was not what I had paid for which left me with permanent health issues. I was used as a guinea pig at this medical institution ( the surgeon allowed his resident to perform the XXXX 1
was notified but verified the inaccuracy 3
was notified that the regulation allows for the notification period to be extended ( indefinitely ) when certain extenuating circumstances exist. Evidence was provided to detail the applicable extenuating circumstance 1
was now impossible. Cardinal then assured Thursday 1
was NOW {$740.00}! 1
was obtained and reported without the legally required safeguards 3
was on a shipping label sent to me by XXXX XXXX for the express purpose of returning those XXXX non-functional phones. After several hours speaking to XXXX XXXX representatives on several different occasions 1
was on hold a while 1
was on hold again 1
was once again addressed incorrectly to XXXX XXXX. '' This repeated error in addressing my name raises concerns about the thoroughness of their investigation and the accuracy of their record-keeping. 1
was only provided the option to add the security freeze to my file. The freeze 1
was opened s well 2
was out of our control. Our attorney XXXX also sent a text message to XXXX advising he could write a letter explaining there is no fault on our end. He did so and that is attached ( file named XXXX ). 1
was out of the office. XXXX advised me to give it another 48 hours to contact the analyst. 1
was over {$10000.00} more than the previously agreed-upon amount dated for XX/XX/XXXX. The explanation providedthat taxes due in XX/XX/XXXX were deducted from my loan accountis perplexing 1
was paid back to me by my employer per a resolution that was reached by the CFPB. 1
was paid in full 1
was paid out. I also have no history of these types of payments in my Cash App account 1
was paid {$1100.00}. for our XX/XX/XXXX year of house insurance. We did not know this until months later however. We received a letter from XXXX XXXX XXXX that the policy lapsed at XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX. They were billing us for {$1100.00}. for the house insurance. 1
was partially denied. A credit for {$470.00} was applied on XX/XX/XXXX 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter W that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related