Total complaints
1
Filed since On X
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows was not what I had paid for which left me with permanent health issues. I was used as a guinea pig at this medical institution ( the surgeon allowed his resident to perform the XXXX's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since On X. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since On X
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How was not what I had paid for which left me with permanent health issues. I was used as a guinea pig at this medical institution ( the surgeon allowed his resident to perform the XXXX's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| I submitted a detailed dispute ( Ref # XXXX ) to AMEX for {$8700.00} regarding the above-mentioned case reference. Kindly refer to that original claim. On XX/XX/XXXX AMEX responded with an outrageous reply that my case was closed because this claim fell under Tort Law and not Consumer Credit Law. Allow me to explain why your Dispute Team | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| which resulted in the wrong XXXX mostly a XXXX! ) and thus the separate tort claim. | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| a supervisor in their customer service department informed me that there is nothing they could do for me as this is a medical service that I was unhappy with | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
was not what I had paid for which left me with permanent health issues. I was used as a guinea pig at this medical institution ( the surgeon allowed his resident to perform the XXXX has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to On X, and the most recent logged activity is On XX/XX/X, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, was not what I had paid for which left me with permanent health issues. I was used as a guinea pig at this medical institution ( the surgeon allowed his resident to perform the XXXX reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "I submitted a detailed dispute ( Ref # XXXX ) to AMEX for {$8700.00} regarding the above-mentioned case reference. Kindly refer to that original claim. On XX/XX/XXXX AMEX responded with an outrageous reply that my case was closed because this claim fell under Tort Law and not Consumer Credit Law. Allow me to explain why your Dispute Team", and the single most common underlying issue is "a supervisor in their customer service department informed me that there is nothing they could do for me as this is a medical service that I was unhappy with".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating was not what I had paid for which left me with permanent health issues. I was used as a guinea pig at this medical institution ( the surgeon allowed his resident to perform the XXXX: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
was not what I had paid for which left me with permanent health issues. I was used as a guinea pig at this medical institution ( the surgeon allowed his resident to perform the XXXX has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
was not what I had paid for which left me with permanent health issues. I was used as a guinea pig at this medical institution ( the surgeon allowed his resident to perform the XXXX has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against was not what I had paid for which left me with permanent health issues. I was used as a guinea pig at this medical institution ( the surgeon allowed his resident to perform the XXXX is "a supervisor in their customer service department informed me that there is nothing they could do for me as this is a medical service that I was unhappy with" in the "I submitted a detailed dispute ( Ref # XXXX ) to AMEX for {$8700.00} regarding the above-mentioned case reference. Kindly refer to that original claim. On XX/XX/XXXX AMEX responded with an outrageous reply that my case was closed because this claim fell under Tort Law and not Consumer Credit Law. Allow me to explain why your Dispute Team" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.