2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 2.7K–2.8K of 13.5K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
the company provides so many barriers for me to conduct an investigation 1
the company refuse to provide any details.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Certegy Holdings 1
the company refused to provide proof of the debt or the amount claimed and continues collection activity and/or reporting. Continued reporting of unverified or inaccurate information after notice constitutes false reporting and unlawful collection activity under the FCRA and FDCPA. 1
the company refuses to update my balances to the correct amounts. 1
the company see the error but can't correct it 1
the company seems scammy '' in that when you try to pay off your note or get information about what money the company is entitled to 1
the company stated that they would cancel my current card and send a new one 1
the company still refuses to do so. Their final decision was based on a lack of internal tooling and processes 1
the company still reported to the credit bureau that we missed two mortgage payments. It should also be noted that we were never notified via phone call 1
the company that owns Money Network 1
The company that reported the information has certified to Experian that the information is accurate. However 1
the company they said the credit information came from 1
the company told me the copy of the original receipt was not clear enough and to-refax it yet again. On XX/XX/19 1
the company waited over a year to do anything about her complaints. Equifax maintains that it has no record of having received her letters 2
the company was closed for the day. Both representatives 1
the company we use for credit card transactions ( XXXX XXXX ) reversed the payment from our account without authorization. We attempted to dispute the issue with XXXX XXXX 1
the company who either bought my debt or a collection agency and XXXX XXXX 1
the company willfully failed to conduct a reasonable investigation dispute and your exhausted assumption is not a valid reason under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The company has not made any reasonable determination that my dispute was frivolous or irrelevant. Nor have the company sent me completeness and or accuracy of information contained in my consumer file. I received a notification via experian.com that the company that reported the information has certified to your company that the information is accurate. If this is true 1
the company would consider my payment as a late payment and also a missed payment considering it wasnt their requested amount. The Hardship Program had no benefits. I was still being charged high interest rates 1
the companys investigations were woefully incomplete. Block directed users who had suffered financial losses as a result of fraud to ask their bank to attempt to reverse transactions 1
The Companys management of risks relating to ethical 1
the Complainant is extremely suspicious that each of the Credit Reporting Agencies are allowing the XXXX XXXX XXXX ( creditor or grantor ) to withhold the Complainants XXXX XXXX XXXX credit limits onto her credit file accounts. When those Credit Reporting Agencies knowingly and willfully knew such omission 1
the Complainant will need to contact the XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
the Complaint does not appear to have been actually filed and is not an official document or official copy of a document from a court. 1
the complaint states : First 1
the complaint will be submit again as a new one and now I have to be additional 30 days. 1
the Complaint will eventually be filed at the Department of Financial Services 1
the complaints have seen on XXXX XXXX 1
the complete contact information for the creditor including their business name 1
the compliance team took forever to reach back despite my repeated attempts to reach out through Coinbase customer support and directly to them. The second email I got from the compliance team was on XX/XX/XXXX 1
the computer just didnt reflect it yet. We then asked about the about the PMI still being charged. At that time we were advised that they can see on the computer the payment had been made ; however 1
the computer was turned on. But then it turned to a black screen 1
the computerized online system would just tell you goodbye and hang up on you ... making you REPEAT the process of providing PII through their system ( I entered or said all of my PII over and over again before I decided to see what other options might lead me to a real person ). 1
the conclusion drawn was whoever had hacked into my account was trying to access it once again. I changed the login information to something dissimilar to the previous two names and that problem was resolved. 1
the condition for including late payments has not been met. Therefore 1
the condition report 1
the conduct described in paragraphs ( b ) through ( f ) of this section. ( b ) Collection of unauthorized amounts. A debt collector must not collect any amount 1
the conduct described in paragraphs ( b ) through ( h ) of this section. ( b ) Repeated or continuous telephone calls or telephone conversations ( 1 ) In general. In connection with the collection of a debt 1
the confirmed damage 1
the conflict of interest in the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX regarding the judge who dismissed my Appeal was a spouse and a partner in the law firm who handled my Appeal in the same Mortgage in a different District of Appeal. This demonstrates a broader pattern of misconduct. And the lower courts judge is biased. The judge denies almost all my motions and ignores all the evidence and ignores rules of law. Service transfers : Bank Of America XXXX the loan to XXXX almost 2 years ago and XXXX in XX/XX/XXXX claimed Bank Of America was still the plaintiff. I contacted Bank Of America XX/XX/XXXX and spoke to representative XXXX 1
The Congress has stated Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681 ( 4 ) that there is a need to insure that consumer reporting agencies exercise their grave responsibility with fairness 14
The Congress under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ). The List of accounts below has violated my federally protected consumer rights to privacy and confidentially Under 15 USC 1681. Per Consumer Financial Protection stated you did investigation XX/XX/XXXX please give me information on how you conduct the investigation and what procedures you took to on this matter. After taking with the local police department here in Washington XXXX DC and family 1
the connection issues continued and resetting the device did not resolve the issue. On XX/XX/XXXX 1
the consideration paid 1
the consolidation loan may be credited with more time in repayment than the loan with the longest amount of time in repayment. Using the same example above 1
the constant change in status every month raises suspicion that there might be a technical issue or glitch within your reporting system. 1
the consumer 42
the consumer 's 1
the consumer 's issue 1
the consumer 's remedy against the seller is under state deceptive trade practices laws pursuant to the provisions of 16 C.F.R 433.2. 16 CFR pt. 433 ( The FTC Holder Rule ). See 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →