2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 9.8K–9.8K of 13.5K

Company Complaints
they were responsible for releasing my funds 1
they were rude 1
they were satisfied that no fraud had occurred 1
they were sending me to lie. 1
they were sent the contract Sales Contract XXXX XXXX for US {$130000.00} 1
they were sorry about these contacts 1
they were still processing it 1
they were still reporting the collection on my credit report and their response 1
they were still responsible for providing billing information and payment plan options to help satisfy this alleged debt. As stated above 2
they were still trying to sort through things 1
they were still working on the complaint 3
they were taking it to the Dump? ( Why wrap them I ask )? I was mortified and further humiliated. As bad as EVICTION is 1
they were told that 2 additional checks between {$50000.00} and around {$60000.00} would be issued. ( One notification of a cancellation is attached as an example ). In conversations with Chase representatives 1
they were too busy. 1
they were unable or unwilling to provide : - Documentation of the original agreement - Proof of service usage - Explanation of charges - Record of payment attempts or notifications **3. Predatory Business Practices** The company 's conduct demonstrates predatory behavior : - Continuing to charge subscription fees for nearly 3 years without service usage - Accumulating fees without adequate notification - Failing to terminate inactive subscriptions - Converting accounts without explicit customer consent # # Requested Actions 1. Immediate cessation of all collection attempts 2. Full reversal of all charges ( {$420.00} ) 3. Investigation into Beem 's business practices 4. Regulatory action to prevent similar predatory practices 5. Review of their acquisition and account conversion practices # # Personal Information XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX TX XXXX Primary Phone : ( XXXX ) XXXX Alternative Phone : ( XXXX ) XXXX Email : XXXX # # Legal Basis This complaint is filed under : - The Consumer Financial Protection Act - The Electronic Fund Transfer Act - The Truth in Lending Act - State consumer protection laws I hereby certify that all information provided in this complaint is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I request that the CFPB investigate these practices and take appropriate regulatory action to protect consumers from such predatory business practices. 1
they were unable to actually make the booking 1
they were unable to answer my questions regarding why I had the balance 1
they were unable to generate a FICO score for me '. I got similar responses from the other two agencies. 3
they were unable to help me. That person stated that an escalation procedure invoked a 7-14 waiting period for a response 1
they were unable to identify an error in the majority of the transactions. Specifically 1
they were unable to issue a refund 1
they were unable to process the charge as fraud. Instead 1
they were unable to produce these crucial documents 1
they were unable to properly validate my identity and terminated the call without addressing the issues I raised. 1
they were unable to provide me with a copy of the verifiable and irrefutable proof that they have on file for every one even each any and or all of the adverse accounts listed below and they failed to do so within 30 days of receipt of my complaint challenging their compliance to true accurate and complete timely reporting they must remove any and all of these accounts of chicanery leading to these unjust and unlawful accusations of subterfuge from my credit report. They are in complete violation.,,EQUIFAX 1
they were unable to verify my identity due to incorrect personal information on their end. If I truly owed this debt 1
they were unable to. In one example 1
they were unfamiliar with this remark and could not find more information on why it was present in my report. The representatives were not able to find anything that warranted a score decrease on my report. 1
they were unhelpful and dismissive 1
they were unsure. I spoke to numerous representatives at XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX 1
they were very nasty and threatening to me.,,SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL,IN,46268,,Consent provided,Web,2024-05-09,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,8962406 1
they were wrapped incorrectly and would allow my home to move in strong wind. ( We live in Wind XXXX XXXX ). 1
they weren't the correct ones. I reversed the charge through XXXX. XXXX XXXX didn't respond to XXXX for the reversal of the charge for over XXXX weeks. And still havent. 1
they werent able to step up and help me with this situation. Instead 1
they werent analyzed for county taxes 1
they why do they have to get a judgement before they can garnish ; whereas 1
they will act as-if they are doing the consumer a favor by reversing fees that shouldn't have been imposed while their life is falling apart due to inaccurate and unfair credit reporting. 4
they will auction off those items. The credit card company calls me 10-15 times/day. The stress and worry has been relayed to every representative I've spoken to 1
they will be foreclosing on many many homes throughout our country based on so many unknown variables. Unsatisfied with her response 1
they will be one of the first ones to go. I hope to be one of the voices that exposes them and their abusive tactics. 1
they will be responsible for reimbursing plaintiff for all attorney fees 1
they will be subject to civil or criminal penalties ...,,DISCOVER BANK,NJ,082XX,,Consent provided,Web,2021-01-28,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,4102439 1
they will call me back 1
they will cease any collection effort and remove the derogatory information form the Credit Bureau. On XX/XX/XXXX 1
they will charge me OD fees for those AGAIN. I have never seen transactions pending handled this way in banking. It is thievery and should be a violation banking acts. The way these transaction reflect on my statement doesn't even reflect this logically. I was charged an overdraft fee on the same night that the transaction posted.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION,IN,46902,,Consent provided,Web,2018-08-03,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,2981566 1
they will close the case? I called the number today and after spending XXXX XXXX hours on the phone two persons consulting with other persons could not determine who sent the XX/XX/XXXX letter or why the amount on the XX/XX/XXXX letter was not correct. Nor could they Decide what I should do. I have one more letter that came from XXXX 1
they will continue these tactics against other consumers as well. 1
they will continue with the investigation 1
they will count my time of service for Public Service Loan Forgiveness and XXXX Loan Forgiveness. I requested to speak with someone else to confirm this information. After being on hold for quite some time the representative responded and stated that they got feedback that the Public Service Loan Forgiveness would not count towards XXXX Loan Forgiveness. I explained that I have received mixed information regarding my unique situation and needed to speak to a manager. After being on hold 1
they will do more financial damages to us. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related