2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: I

Companies starting with I that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

25.6K companies starting with "I"

Showing 24.5K–24.6K of 25.6K

Company Complaints
it is necessary immediately to take adequate sanctions against the banks mentioned. In any case 4
it is never resolved eventually. Dispute was rejected and they are still overcharging me at the moment.,,GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA,NC,282XX,,Consent provided,Web,2023-02-01,Closed with monetary relief,Yes,N/A,6508758 1
it is no longer acceptable for the bureaus to take reported items at face value without first securing original documentation from furnishers. 2
it is no longer legally reportable and must be removed.,,Southwest Credit Systems 1
it is no longer reasonable to assume that every item on a credit report genuinely belongs to the consumer without independent verification. 3
it is no one 's fault. It is not ours 1
it is not 1
it is not a legal American Accounting Standard.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION - SAN FRANCISCO MAIN BRANCH,CA,90291,Older American,Consent provided,Web,2018-10-01,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,3033822 1
it is not a required element to show material interference. 1
it is not a valid debt for collection. 1
it is not a valid debt obligation of mine and should not be reported against me. 1
it is not accurate either. 1
it is not appropriate in any way to speak to any member of the XXXX XXXX team in a manner less than professional ( i.e. raised voice 1
it is not at Bank of America 's discretion as to whether they wish to take a loss or not 1
it is not clear whether they are doing it out of spite because I dare questioned their competence in completing the action or if their processes are so horribly flawed that a loan closure that takes on average 30 - 40 days will apparently take them more than 70 at a minimum ) Bottom line 1
it is not currently a government-backed '' loan under the CARES Act. '' My response - so you won't honor this even though my XXXX XXXX loan was sold to a private company in XX/XX/XXXX under no fault of my own and I have no recourse for them doing so. So you are not operating in the spirit of the Cares Act. 1
it is not difficult for fraudsters to mimic IP addresses using widely available technology. Even without being an IT expert 1
it is not excuse for essentially converting over {$5000.00} in assets.,,BAM Management US Holdings Inc.,MO,631XX,,Consent provided,Web,2021-06-02,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,4408434 1
it is not for XXXX to keep!,,Ocwen Financial Corporation,WI,XXXXX,Servicemember,Consent provided,Web,2020-04-17,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,3607638 1
it is not from me and unless Huntington Bank has other Material PROOF 1
It is not lawful for a collection account to be reported in the status of Open if this account is being reported as a collection this account should be is closed. This account must be removed based on the false and misleading reporting stats of reported as an open account. As a consumer based on 29 CFR 500.6 - Accuracy of information 1
it is not lawful to be denied my right to grant credit. Furthermore 1
it is not longer there. However 1
it is not my error that I should have to start over 1
it is not obvious that you have been charged {$1.00} and that after 7 days you will begin getting charged {$20.00} per month. 1
it is not our fault that you are in this situation 2
it is not possible for me to identify every fraudulent account separately through the CFPB platform. Therefore 1
IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO CONTACT THEM IN WRITING 1
it is not the same address as the Physical address and/or the Lot 's primary Parcel number 1
it is not too late (see attachment 10). I received two additional letters dated XXXX XXXX XXXX from XXXX XXXX XXXX informing me that a Notice of Default had been recorded against my property. In response I sent three separate Qualified Written Requests via certified mail in which I contested the Notice of Default and requested an itemized statement 1
it is not unreasonable to suspect that PayPal 's actions are not innocent mistakes.,,Paypal Holdings 1
it is NOT up to me to prove that I do not owe the claimed charge ; it is up to the merchant 1
it is not valid and has to be removed. 2
it is not working. 1
It is not XXXX 's fault. TransUnion stopped taking their ( Telcos ) reports 1
it is not. 1
it is not. The only other way was to have someone from their Fraud department open a case 1
it is now a complaint with the CFPB. 1
it is now all over then news that this type of loan is the exception to the PSLF waiver. 1
it is now closed 1
it is now XX/XX/XXXX and there has been no resolution on FedLoan 's behalf. They NEVER contacted me once regarding this account 1
it is now your responsibility to reflect this deletion on my credit report. The FCRA also protects consumers by mandating that unverifiable accounts be removed. Under FCRA 609 and 611 1
it is null and void. Then they upped it to the original debt amount 1
it is of utmost importance that my credit report accurately reflects my creditworthiness. Hence 1
it is often the borrowers contractual right to assert a claim against the loan holder and seek a discharge of that loan. Complaints 1
it is on a piece of huge land and they want to Foreclosure me to Sell for Big Profit. That there is criminal and can not go unpunished. 1
it is on all my credit reports. No one at XXXX would explain it to me. No one will remove it. 1
it is on the Account history from my account online with Navient. That was one thing that puzzled us both. Then we get to the paperwork I received from Navient on XX/XX/XXXX stating The school for the loan listed returned a disbursement of {$1100.00} but this loan is not considered paid in full. My question about this to XXXX was 1
it is only a tracking information shown and no further updates. Today before making this complaint 1
it is only one month left for the deadline of the tax return. I am very anxious. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter I that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related