2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: I

Companies starting with I that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

25.6K companies starting with "I"

Showing 24.1K–24.1K of 25.6K

Company Complaints
it accepts as an asset the borrowers debt obligation ( the promise to repay ) and creates a liability on its books in the form of a demand deposit in the amount of the loan. ( Consumer loans are funded similarly. ) Therefore 1
it actually cost me more money now if I want to keep using the card. This is a waste of my time and money and extremely deceptive.,,JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.,CA,94109,,Consent provided,Web,2018-03-27,Closed with monetary relief,Yes,N/A,2856701 1
it affects my monthly living expenses 1
it all has to be processed via mail. So 1
it all looks sketchy.,,Jim Bottin Enterprises 1
it allows a time-barred and previously deleted debt to stay on my file longer than the law allows. 1
it allows additional transactions out of a brand new account. XXXX. has lost a total of {$5900.00} from his checking account. 1
it also breached its responsibilities under the law. 1
it also greatly affected my credit.,,SUN WEST MORTGAGE COMPANY 1
it also involves a personal guarantee. This morning 1
it also list both mortgages with Wells Fargo. Now these mortgages are in no way affected by this bankruptcy except to tell us to continue making payments at the amounts listed. You following me here 1
it also seemed like Groves Capital was citing XXXX XXXX license as well as their XXXX License. When I then compared the Loan Estimate I had received when XXXX XXXX quoted the XXXX by XXXX XXXX at 12.625% and roughly XXXX in points 1
it also violates the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ). 1
it appeared either CapitalOne had done something in the system to not show delinquency 1
it appeared in defense of her manager. It was very disrespectful. I took the card and departed. 1
it appeared that our own local judges had not yet gotten the memo about the egregious and illegal acts being conducted by mortgage servicers and they 2
it appeared that the accounts had been reopened and the the funds returned to the checking account and the XXXX 1
it appeared that the electronic system was not working properly. I then uploaded a paper version of the yearly recertification to XXXX XXXX XXXX website. The loan servicer took several weeks to review my request and then denied it stating that they did not have information about my XXXX income. They then capitalized all of the interest owed on the loan to the principal and increased my monthly repayment amount from {$270.00} to approximately {$2800.00}. They stated that I did not submit my request for yearly recertifying of my eligibility for income-based repayment in a timely fashion -- similar to what they did in XXXX. I resubmitted the form to them electronically and requested to attach my income tax information for my XXXX income taxes from the IRS. I then called XXXX XXXX and they told me that my only option was to place the loan into forbearance so that they can have additional time to calculate my monthly repayment amount under the Revised Pay As You Earn Plan. They read me some disclaimer stating that by placing my loan into forbearance ( so that they have an opportunity to process my income-driven repayment request ) they will capitalize all of the interest to the loan principal. I stated that I did not approve of them capitalizing the interest and that I was disputing the monthly payment amount of {$2800.00}. I am still attempting to resolve this issue with them. They have not processed my pending request to recertify my monthly repayment amount and my account is displaying that it is delinquent. Their servicing issues have been forced upon me and they are attempting to force me to pay more than 10x the amount that I was certified to pay based on my Adjusted Gross Income from XXXX and I have attempted in good faith several times to submit the IDR request to recalculate my monthly repayment amount under the Revised Pay As You Earn Plan. 1
it appeared that the medical group actually sent the invoice to the wrong address 1
it appeared that XXXX XXXX profited from this situation 1
it appears 1
it appears Experian has failed to meet its obligations under the FCRA and has wrongfully dismissed my requests by mischaracterizing them as unauthorized. 1
it appears I underpaid. I have never been notified of a change in payment. 1
it appears that a plausible value for the subject would be within a reasonable range tolerance of the {$280000.00} value as determined by Appraisal # 1 in this case. 1
it appears that BSI will simply continue to require incorrect payment amounts indefinitely. Thank you very much for your help.,,BSI Financial Holdings 1
it appears that Capital One would have had to have known that I would ( ultimately ) be ineligible for this bonus from the start 1
it appears that certain individuals 1
it appears that he and XXXX XXXX are trying to cover up for his actions. I believe 1
it appears that I not only made the XXXX payments BUT also the remaining payments yet I never was approved for the Modification Plan and XXXX STILL Foreclosed on me. So 1
it appears that practice by Bank of America has not abated. 1
it appears that the transactions were done overseas which should have been another red flag for BB & T to noticed like XXXX XXXX did because borders were and are still closed ( I uploaded relevant documents ). This is how a real bank take necessary steps to safeguard access to their client account not the other way around. Furthermore 1
it appears that there is a law that requires the CD to be signed 3 days prior to settlement. Not only did he produce a new CD the morning of settlement ( that I didn't sign ) he never explained to me why the costs increased so much. My realtor later explained that the taxes had been paid by the seller and needed to be reimbursed 1
it appears that these preventive measures were not implemented 1
it appears that they either keep the customer service line unstaffed 1
it appears that this is also predatory in order to collect more interest on this loan. 1
it appears that TransUnion 1
it appears that U S Bank thinks my endeavor ( s ) to get my money back needs to end- We ( U S Bank employee ) know where you are & if you continue 1
it appears that USAA has serious problems with their payment application process and intentionally is attempting to coerce customers into paying to bring a delinquent loan current 1
it appears that XXXX 4
it appears that you do not have reasonable procedures in place to assure maximum accuracy and completeness of the information that you include in your consumer reports that you prepare concerning me. Your prompt attention to this important matter is requested in to comply with federal law. 1
it appears the system thinks it did 1
it appears the theft was done internally. The money was taken on the exact date my money was deposited on the card 1
it appears they arent taking thorough notes to understand or fix the issue. 1
it appears they continue to use the wrong dispute reason to justify closing the dispute ( as quality of work 1
it appears they have ignored all that has been said to them. The State of Oregon reviews the tax payment issue every two years 1
it appears to be 100 %. I tried to sign in the customer portal to retrieve my original load agreement document 1
it appears to be quite odd that {$11000.00} is not at either bank 1
it appears to have been improperly associated with my consumer file 1
it appears to have been recently added without any prior notification or opportunity to validate 1
it appears to us that Wells Fargo was simply attempting to make it appear that they were participating in the program. Ironically we received an email from Wells Fargo on XX/XX/XXXX updating us about the status of their PPP program 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter I that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related