Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
XXXX still could not do anything so I really dont know but WHY ASKED in the 1st place! Regardless 3
XXXX still refused to drop the charge. According to XXXX 1
XXXX still says 90 '' and XXXX through XXXX all say 120. In our previous complaint 1
XXXX Substitution of Trustee naming XXXX as the beneficiary trustee which I have not received to date. Who the XXXX is XXXX to me prior to being notified? For all I knew XXXX was XXXX of those scam debt collectors since Bank of America already decided to park and stall the MHA HAMP TPP process and had placed a Cease and Desist tag and code on the home loan mortgage account back in XXXX XXXX. 1
XXXX successfully opened a trust account under the name XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX without any issues or delays 2
XXXX suddenly ceased operations and failed to complete my treatment or provide further service. 2
XXXX suddenly refunded my credit balance from my XXXX overpayment 4
XXXX suggested that I transfer the money back using XXXX. He provided the email addresses of the recipients who the remaining {$8000.00} was supposed to be returned too. In good faith 1
XXXX SunTrust who informed me that XXXX XXXX would be investigating my problems regarding the missing funds 1
XXXX supply contract was concluded XXXX dated XX/XX/XXXX. for suppling tin for producing lids. Pursuant to this agreement 1
XXXX SUPREME LENDING ; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS 1
XXXX switched everything up. I tried reaching out to his customer support for a refund 1
XXXX Syllabus NOTE : Where it is feasible 1
XXXX talking to customer service. The lady still did not have an answer and told me My case was being reviewed by the legal team. I called again XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX tax was applied how did SLS came with this amount and provide property tax bill only. ON XX/XX/XXXX {$17000.00} AND XX/XX/XXXX PROPERTY TAX {$2700.00} WAS APPLIED TO ACCOUNT EXHIBIT D F AND PROVIDE TAX BILLS ONLY DO NOT PROVIDE ESCROW ANALYSIS. 1
XXXX Teller ID XXXX 1
XXXX term count is listed as 0 6
XXXX Terms Scheduled Payment High Balance Loan Type Credit Card Responsibility Individual Company Name XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Account Number XXXX Comments Charged off account 2
XXXX Terms Scheduled Payment High Balance Loan Type Credit Card Responsibility Individual Company Name XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Account XXXX XXXX Comments Charged off account 1
XXXX Terms Scheduled Payment High Balance Loan Type Credit Card Responsibility Individual Company Name XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX Account Number XXXX Comments Charged off account 1
XXXX TEXAS 1
XXXX Texas.XXXX with a new Acct # XXXX ; without my knowledge until I filed Chapter XXXX Bankruptcy. There is only one original account number XXXX ; and Title Max has made it difficult for me track and receive my Car Title back due to the inactive Bond Status. 1
XXXX Thank You for your time in this matter.,,CAVALRY INVESTMENTS 1
XXXX that Please be advised Caliber is unable to confirm any actions or provide any answers in regards to the previous servicer as we are not affiliated with them. In order to have these concerns adequately addressed 1
XXXX that bifurcates into XXXX distinct trajectories. Should you opt for the path of ethical redress 1
XXXX that my account is in default and that there will be a property inspection scheduled that I will be billed for as a delinquency expense. 1
XXXX that same day informing them 1
XXXX that she needs training and/or certification on how to properly operate the XXXX XXXX since XXXX had to readjust the paddles correctly on my abdomen as well as XXXX and increase the wattage on the machine after the XXXX initially started the treatment. 1
XXXX that they determined I was responsible. In reviewing Citi 's own guidance 1
XXXX that they had done everything they could and we just had to wait on the agencies to make corrections. Experian told me on XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX that they would reimburse me for business related expanse as well as all amounts owed. When it became clear that the owners of XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX that were returned by Litton Loan for several varying reasons 2
XXXX that works for a cyber security company and he had written an article about Money Mules '' in XXXX and how it was becoming more and more common for scammers '' to perform stunts like this. 1
XXXX that would make me responsible for these charges. Therefore 1
XXXX that's impossible 2
XXXX The answer was always the same : there is no record of receiving the Statement of Fraud by either mail or fax therefore we can not investigate it. '' After losing my patience 1
XXXX the consumer made a credit card payment on the debt equal to the insurance payment 1
XXXX The correct and current address is XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX the credit reporting agencies ( CRAs ) and the creditors 4
XXXX the firm paid {$2.00} XXXX to settle the XXXX investigation 1
XXXX The following personal information is incorrect PREVIOUS ADDRESS : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX The following transactions on my account are fraud : XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$0.00} XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$0.00} XX/XX/XXXX XXXX Spend Transfer XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$0.00} XX/XX/XXXX XXXX Spend Transfer XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$0.00} XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$0.00} XX/XX/XXXX XXXX Spend Transfer XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$0.00} XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX $ XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$1000.00} XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$1500.00} XX/XX/XXXX Mass Metal XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$0.00} XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$0.00} XX/XX/XXXX XXXX to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$1000.00} XX/XX/XXXX Tele-Transfer to XXXX Reference XXXX XXXX {$5000.00} XX/XX/XXXX XXXX TO XXXX REFERENCE # XXXX {$7500.00} XX/XX/XXXX TELE-TRANSFER TO XXXX REFERENCE # XXXX {$3100.00} XX/XX/XXXX PURCHASE AUTHORIZED ON XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX FL XXXX CARD XXXX {$550.00} XX/XX/XXXX ATM WITHDRAWAL XXXX ON XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX FL XXXX ATM ID XXXX CARD XXXX {$200.00},Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,FL,33130,,Consent provided,Web,2022-04-04,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,5404950 1
XXXX the Foreclosure Attorney leaving a voice mail ( only option provided when voice mail box was not full ) to no avail. I have spent in excess of more than 30 days and over 24 hours of cumulative hold time spent trying to avoid foreclosure proceedings and payoff the quote. Please note the 'Notice of Default ' that was filed on on our property on XX/XX/XXXX only provided PHH contact information by which to obtain a payoff quote and lists 90 days to resolve. The payoff figure listed showed a good through date of XX/XX/XXXX ( we received on XX/XX/XXXX ). We are nearing the expiration of the Default with foreclosure impending. Again 1
XXXX the loan servicer for XXXX XXXX continued to report this plan as late payments which is not fair. Please see the attached documents for your review.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
XXXX the Supervisor I spoke with stated it might have been rerouted to the proper department and stated I check back on XX/XX/2022. I called again on XX/XX/2022 and spoke with a Representative who could not assist me because he could not find where the coupon vouchers were or if there were any notes on what was sent. Finally 1
XXXX theft protection system is not even on the truck. This shows that Wells Fargo had actual knowledge of fraud at the time of the origination of the loan. 1
XXXX then locked me out of my account for what I am told would be the amount of time to process the transaction 1
XXXX then placed me on hold several times to then have found all documentation 1
XXXX then said okay 1
XXXX then the Complainant was connected to the XXXX XXXX XXXX Disputes Resolution Department 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.