| while I was waiting on XXXX XXXXXXXX | 1 | 0.0% | so I thought.. SPS Finally posted the payment to my account |
| while I was working. At XXXX,Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,Amsher Collection Services | 1 | 0.0% | XXXX |
| while ignoring evidence provided by the consumer is considered willful. | 1 | 0.0% | I received the Results of the Reinvestigation |
| while Im left dealing with the financial consequences of their mistake? | 1 | 0.0% | in XX/XX/year> |
| while in my presence. On XX/XX/XXXX | 1 | 0.0% | I was typically provided with information that did not match the statement made by the previous customer service representative. For example |
| while in reality | 1 | 0.0% | which was done in the bank |
| while in the branch office of XXXX XXXX submitting the documents for the identity verification process | 1 | 0.0% | the last five years at the address submitted on the credit card applications and shown on all documentations provided to Wells Fargo for the identity verification process. During all these years |
| while interest debts get larger and ruin my score ) I do wonder if synchrony purposely made the decision to close my account because it's no benefit to them at all. Compared to other cards which collect interest. I've never had this happen with other credit cards | 1 | 0.0% | which is one of the worst possible scenarios in credit. This of course destroyed my credit score and is now having a domino affect. To make matters worst the agreed upon deal is XXXX year payment plan no interet |
| while it accepted payments in past years to pay for its insurance premiums and misapplied these as well. For two decades or more | 1 | 0.0% | XX/XX/XXXX |
| while it is XX/XX/XXXX on Experian and XX/XX/XXXX on XXXX. These inconsistencies violate Section 1681c and 1681g of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ). | 1 | 0.0% | the original creditor being XXXX XXXX |
| while it is XX/XX/XXXX on XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX on Equifax. These inconsistencies violate Section 1681c and 1681g of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ). | 1 | 0.0% | the original creditor being XXXX XXXX |
| while it is XX/XX/XXXX on XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX on XXXX. These inconsistencies violate Section 1681c and 1681g of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ). | 1 | 0.0% | the original creditor being XXXX XXXX |
| while it may or may not be relevant the Realtor who conducted the PMI was the exact same Realtor who represented the seller when the purchased the house XX/XX/XXXX. She knew or should have known the value of the house at that time | 1 | 0.0% | the Additional Comments '' section of the XXXX undermine the final determination reached by the Realtor. In this section ( page XXXX ) the Realtor notes the extensive upgrades made to the property. She expressly listed the major upgrades made |
| while it was being investigated | 1 | 0.0% | I allowed use of my computer to a stranger |
| while legally barring me from recording the same phone calls that their client XXXX XXXX XXXX is recording. The best specific examples of run-arounds I've been getting pertaining to communication methods can be found in the attached faxes.zip '',,Law Office of Harris & Zide,WY,82801,,Consent provided,Web,2020-12-10,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,4003305 | 1 | 0.0% | Harris and Zides communication with me has been awful. They are not responding to emails or faxes I have sent them |
| while living in California | 2 | 0.0% | not even a month later |
| WHILE MAKING ME JUST STAND THEIR IN SILENCE WITH MY PAINFUL FOOT LESIONS. | 1 | 0.0% | I CANCELLED MY ACCOUNTS WITH US BANK ON MY OWN ACCORD. BUT I STILL NEED TO HAVE THEM OPEN UP MY ACCOUNTS WITH ALL MY MONEY IN IT |
| while making only cosmetic updates | 1 | 0.0% | you are required to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation '' of disputed information. Your response indicates you simply contacted the data furnisher |
| while making patently false and misleading representations | 1 | 0.0% | the conduct of XXXX to engage in illegal and unethical conduct of falsely impersonating a debt collection attorney |
| while mine is 'secondary '. I am residing | 1 | 0.0% | XXXX |
| while mine started at only {$700.00} and has now been dropped to a mere {$100.00}. | 1 | 0.0% | I know this is unfair practice. My mother |
| while Mohela continued to mislead me | 1 | 0.0% | they automatically put me on the 10 year standard repayment plan. I mentioned to them about the Processing interest free forbearance due to my save plan application being pending and they misled me by telling me my only option was admin forbearance '' with interest accruing and that I would have to call every two months to request and process it. So from XXXX to XXXX I had to continue calling every two months until one day |
| while my financing payment is {$310.00} per month | 1 | 0.0% | during the sales process |
| while my loss mitigation review and forbearance extension were being considered. | 1 | 0.0% | I spoke with a representative named XXXX |
| while my most recent e-billing statement dated XX/XX/XXXX indicates that the amount overdue is {$430.00}. Customer service has assured me multiple times on multiple calls that all of these amounts are errors and should be wiped from my account. I had also been assured that my XX/XX/XXXX payment would be re-assigned to my loans as intended to qualify towards PSLF | 1 | 0.0% | on XX/XX/XXXX I received correspondence that XXXX had received and processed a forbearance request applicable to date range of XXXX. I had not requested this forbearance |
| while my namemy only true possessionis dragged through the mud. | 2 | 0.0% | desperately pleading for help |
| while my payment was submitted at XXXX XXXX | 1 | 0.0% | my most recent payment was submitted on the payment date itself |
| while my son 's address is in XXXX. | 1 | 0.0% | nor my son.. It is made payable to XXXX XXXX XXXX. So ... on or around XXXX/XXXX/XXXX |
| while my start date for my new job was over 90 days away. There were no date restrictions on the disclosure document | 1 | 0.0% | they chose to wait until the eleventh hour to inform me of their unwillingness to fund my mortgage. It is unclear whether this was due to intentional misrepresentation or gross incompetence. I believe that Better Mortgage may have been in violation of Title 12 |
| while my top financial priority each month is my loan payment.,,Navient Solutions | 1 | 0.0% | whispers that offered me the first faint glimmer of hope in 20 years. There is now established legal precedent that my school acting in conjunction with Sallie Mae ( Navient/Navient XXXX ) lied to XXXX deceived |
| while my XXXX report shows none. I also called XXXX and they confirmed there is no chase account with my ssn. After realizing no one was willing to help me get to the bottom of this situation and fix it | 1 | 0.0% | I decided to try Chase again to get the card that I actually wanted |
| while named on the mortgage and on legal foreclosure documents | 1 | 0.0% | XXXX XXXX as Trustee for XXXX XXXX XXXX further declared within its publication titled Role of the Corporate Trustee enclosed hereto as Exhibit 2 |
| while necessary | 1 | 0.0% | I demand that Bridgecrest immediately instruct all consumer reporting agencies ( XXXX |
| while neither of my wife 's credit cards that were fraudulently charged asked for this. I explained over and over the situation and how we were refused a cash receipt. After months of calls | 1 | 0.0% | but before boarding we immediately called all three credit card companies to alert them of what had just occurred. I was assured that the charges would not go through from the SERVICE REP. When I returned to the XXXX and I called XXXX XXXX XXXX to review the issue and to see if they would be canceling the card and sending a new card. The representative did send me out a new card. When I received the new credit card it had the same numbers as previous card. I called to customer service to activate the card and to confirm that the previous representative that I had already spoke to a few days earlier had done the correct procedure. I went over all the charges again and situation with the SERVICE REP and they said that the charge would be removed within a few days. The charge was removed |
| while no such account ever existed but claimed CITIBANK N.A. as original. Again | 1 | 0.0% | XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX |
| while no such account ever existed but claimed XXXX XXXX. as original. Again | 1 | 0.0% | XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX |
| while not being able to cite the specific XXXX policy or even source on the website. I checked resources on XXXX website and it is NOT MENTIONED AT ALL that there is a 10 day verification period for an Affidavit. The call with this representative ended after 26 minutes. | 1 | 0.0% | this security team member said it would take up to 10 days to process an affidavit. I then asked for proof on XXXX official policy on the 10 days |
| while not being able to give any reason at all for what is going on. Both refer to the back office '' as the source of the negative action. | 1 | 0.0% | treated with suspicion |
| while NOTHING is being done. Instead I get a simple generic response via online correspondence | 1 | 0.0% | trying to collect an incorrect balance |
| while obviously legally proper | 1 | 0.0% | I must state |
| while offering no basis for appeal | 1 | 0.0% | which reveal what factors are considered and those factors being directly related to credit-worthiness and based specifically on penalizing bad behavior of the individual being scored |
| while offering no solution. | 1 | 0.0% | e-mail |
| while omitting the credit reporting agencies used XXXX to verify information through I.C. System on those 6 different occasions. This admission is proof that I.C. System is committing aggravated identity theft pursuant to 18 USC 1028A | 1 | 0.0% | The account information IC System furnished to the credit reporting agencies was provided by the original creditor and has been verified by the credit bureaus ( XX/XX/XXXX |
| while on auto pay | 1 | 0.0% | in the hopes that many others will see this |
| while on the financial institutions liability side of the ledger | 1 | 0.0% | it is a Fact |
| while on the phone talking with XXXX a Representative from XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) called me so we were able to bridge her in | 1 | 0.0% | On XXXX we called Chase Bank ( Bankruptcy Dept. who handles all Washington Mutual Bank accounts ) XXXX and spoke to Chase Bank Representative XXXX |
| while Original Creditor XXXX XXXX Bank ( XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX | 2 | 0.0% | multiple collections have been either inaccurately reported or missing from certain bureaus |
| while other accounts also report 1 to 10 late payments. These late payment remarks are disputed based on billing error resolution and reporting inaccuracies | 1 | 0.0% | the report includes a substantial number of late payment remarks across multiple accounts. For instance |
| while other bureaus show different delinquency information. | 1 | 0.0% | inaccurate data across XXXX |
| while other existing cardholders received letters that only their US Bank checking accounts will count to satisfy the qualifying balance requirement ( the bad '' letter | 1 | 0.0% | on or around XX/XX/XXXX |
