2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 2.5K–2.5K of 13.5K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
the CFPB guidelines are 37 days and the packet was submitted prior to that deadline. That notwithstanding 1
the CFPB had to take action against Select Portfolio Servicing twice during that time frame to even get me my mortgage package. Select Portfolio Servicing has been reporting accurately since the CFPB literally forced them to 1 ) give me my correct mortgage package and 2 ) force them to admit that they had my singed copies ( CFPB actually delivered my signed docs to SPS for me in the 15 month period! ). Long story short Select Portfolio Servicing actually caused the 15 month long issue themselves and have damaged my credit for those 15 months on top of all of other undue stress they caused. Unbelievable. Select Portfolio Servicing even states in their response that because I was in the trial period '' for all of those months which they caused themselves is the reason why they refuse to report all 60 months as paid as agreed '' as if a 15 moth trial period is completely normal. I would be so very appreciative if the CFPB could investigate the matter and have Select Portfolio Servicing report all 60 payments truthful as paid as agreed ''. I never agreed to that in the first place and for Select Portfolio Servicing to use the very 15 month period against me that they spent trying to steal my home and the very same time frame that the CFPB had to step in twice against them is really quite brazen to say the least! I called the CFPB yesterday and had a pretty in depth conversation. I had read the HAMP program procedure and am familiar with it 1
the CFPB had to take action against XXXX XXXX XXXX twice during that time frame to even get me my mortgage package. XXXX XXXX XXXX has been reporting accurately since the CFPB literally forced them to 1 ) give me my correct mortgage package and 2 ) force them to admit that they had my singed copies ( CFPB actually delivered my signed docs to XXXX for me in the 15 month period! ). Long story short XXXX XXXX XXXX actually caused the 15 month long issue themselves and have damaged my credit for those 15 months on top of all of other undue stress they caused. Unbelievable. XXXX XXXX XXXX even states in their response that because I was in the trial period '' for all of those months which they caused themselves is the reason why they refuse to report all 60 months as paid as agreed '' as if a 15 moth trial period is completely normal. I would be so very appreciative if the CFPB could investigate the matter and have XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXeport all 60 payments truthful as paid as agreed ''. I never agreed to that in the first place and for XXXX XXXX XXXX to use the very 15 month period against me that they spent trying to steal my home and the very same time frame that the CFPB had to step in twice against them is really quite brazen to say the least! I called the CFPB yesterday and had a pretty in depth conversation. I had read the HAMP program procedure and am familiar with it 1
the CFPB had to take action against XXXX XXXX XXXX twice during that time frame to even get me my mortgage package. XXXX XXXX XXXX has been reporting accurately since the CFPB literally forced them to 1 ) give me my correct mortgage package and 2 ) force them to admit that they had my singed copies ( CFPB actually delivered my signed docs to XXXX for me in the 15 month period! ). Long story short XXXX XXXX XXXX actually caused the 15 month long issue themselves and have damaged my credit for those 15 months on top of all of other undue stress they caused. Unbelievable. XXXX XXXX XXXX even states in their response that because I was in the trial period '' for all of those months which they caused themselves is the reason why they refuse to report all 60 months as paid as agreed '' as if a 15 moth trial period is completely normal. I would be so very appreciative if the CFPB could investigate the matter and have Select Portfolio Servicing report all 60 payments truthful as paid as agreed ''. I never agreed to that in the first place and for XXXX XXXX XXXX to use the very 15 month period against me that they spent trying to steal my home and the very same time frame that the CFPB had to step in twice against them is really quite brazen to say the least! I called the CFPB yesterday and had a pretty in depth conversation. I had read the HAMP program procedure and am familiar with it 1
the CFPB had to take action against XXXX XXXX XXXX twice during that time frame to even get me my mortgage package. XXXX XXXX XXXX has been reporting accurately since the CFPB literally forced them to 1 ) give me my correct mortgage package and 2 ) force them to admit that they had my singed copies ( CFPB actually delivered my signed docs to XXXX for me in the 15 month period! ). Long story short XXXX XXXX XXXX actually caused the 15 month long issue themselves and have damaged my credit for those 15 months on top of all of other undue stress they caused. Unbelievable. XXXX XXXX XXXX even states in their response that because I was in the trial period '' for all of those months which they caused themselves is the reason why they refuse to report all 60 months as paid as agreed '' as if a 15 moth trial period is completely normal. I would be so very appreciative if the CFPB could investigate the matter and have XXXX XXXX XXXX report all 60 payments truthful as paid as agreed ''. I never agreed to that in the first place and for XXXX XXXX XXXX to use the very 15 month period against me that they spent trying to steal my home and the very same time frame that the CFPB had to step in twice against them is really quite brazen to say the least! I called the CFPB yesterday and had a pretty in depth conversation. I had read the HAMP program procedure and am familiar with it 1
the CFPB has supervisory and enforcement authority over financial institutions like XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX and service providers like Mercury Card. 1
the CFPB ordered Bank of America to pay XXXX XXXX in redress to its victims for illegal credit card practices. And in XXXX of this year 1
the CFPB required XXXX XXXX XXXX to pay redress to affected consumer and pay a {$1.00} XXXX penalty to the CFPBs victim relief fund. 1
the CFPB should add the following to their examination procedures : 1 ) Have multiple interns follow the phone prompt for 1 ) proper regulatory disclosures and 2 ) customer ease of use 2 ) Access Mr. Cooper 's back-end servicing tables and query for excess late fees. Then cross reference to recent automated payments that have been stopped. Research for Mr. Cooper anomalies and root cause Mr. Cooper errors. Examine for thematic issues. 3 ) Have Mr. Cooper perform e 1
the CFPB sued Equifax for failing to properly investigate consumer disputes and continuing to report inaccurate data. 1
the CFPB who's job it is to regulate them and has failed to-do such. My next complaint will be tomthe XXXX 3
the CFPB will take aggressive action to ensure that regulated companies follow the law and meet their obligations to assist consumers during the COVID-19 pandemic. [ 2 ] As such 1
the CFPBs lawsuit seeks to halt these alleged unlawful practices 1
the chain of custody 3
the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the Calculation of Registration Fee table in the effective Registration Statement ; and ( iii ) To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in this Registration Statement or any material change to such information in this Registration Statement ; provided 1
the changes would cost us an additional {$470.00} annually and {$11000.00} using the average lifespan of Americans. Adding insult to injury 1
the charge appeared on my credit card account. A few days later 1
the charge continues to show on my credit report 1
the charge has continued to occur. 1
the charge of {$50.00} is in relation to the same charges referenced above which were paid promptly by me on XX/XX/XXXX 1
the charge off was XXXX which is more that than the balance. In addition 1
the charge was denied again. I called the elusive representatives again 1
the charge was for {$110.00}. Now 1
the charge was never marked 1
the charge with XXXX was part of an automatic billing service. This is further proven by XXXX transaction log for my card which shows the stolen card to be manually entered. 1
the charge-off amount is unsubstantiated and potentially invalid. 1
the charge-off occurred only once. Such repetitive reporting creates an impression of recurring negative events 3
the Charge-Off status is outside the legal guidelines 3
the chargeback was reversed in the merchant 's favor on XX/XX/XXXX. 1
The Charged account and Collection accounts list below is being reported on my credit MUST be removed. Account Name : XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX ) 2
The Charged account and Collection accounts list below is being reported on my credit MUST be removed. Account Name : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXThe Charged accounts and Collection accounts being reported on my credit MUST be removed. Account Name : XXXX XXXX Account # : XXXX Balance XXXX. Has been discharged off which reported as income. Mark account PAID AS AGREED. ALL companies listed are financial institutions under that title. 15 USC 1681 section 604 a section 2 states that In general Subject to subsection ( c ) 1
the charges are still there.,,SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL,FL,34787,,Consent provided,Web,2025-03-19,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,12559230 1
the charges disappeared from my account. I thought that that was the end of it 1
the charges from XXXX are revealing in that they are all from states all over America 1
the charges made on the credit card were not mine and that I had already asked Midland Credit Management XXXX Inc in XX/XX/XXXX for a list of the charges made and was refused. Had Midland Credit Management 1
the charges made on the credit card were not mine and that I had already asked XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX in XX/XX/XXXX for a list of the charges made and was refused. Had XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX sent me a list of the charges in XXXX 1
the charges related to products not delivered were still there and I was held liable for that and was denied any support from My Synchrony. This meant that I was accumulating interest for products that I never received.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL,TX,77429,,Consent provided,Web,2023-09-21,Closed with monetary relief,Yes,N/A,7577358 1
the charges were still pending and did not drop. 1
the Chase ATM confirmed the total amount 1
the Chase mobile app for my XXXX shows that I have a balance of {$240.00} ( that is both present and available whatever the difference is ). This reflects the {$300.00} transfer clearing into my account 1
the Chase representative said the fax from the attorney could n't be read. I offered to send her a copy 1
the Chase representative told me that it was a scam 1
the chat representative informed me 1
the cheap products 1
the check ( Exhibit 1 ) included my personal information 1
The Check Cashing Place, Inc. 6
the check engine light came on. I tried to get quotes but couldnt find anything I could afford. I called the Service Manager again 1
the check had been deposited into a Bank of America account. The text Pay to the order of : XXXX XXXX had been written in someone elses handwriting underneath my husbands signature in the endorsement section of the check. We picked up a Declaration of Unauthorized Endorsement or Altered Item form from the branch. On the same day 1
the check I had cashed was returned and my account was hit with a fee. 1
the check is correctly debited from issuers account and now holding in my account. If this is the direction to go 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →