2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 12.2K–12.3K of 13.5K

Company Complaints
to the student loan discharge account they create for me. Without responding to my appeal 1
to the trustor 1
to the tune of $ XXXX.I advised the collections representative at Synchrony Bank that I was advised by XXXX XXXX sales representative XXXX XXXX that my minimum monthly payment was $ XXXX {$40.00} ; the collections representative from Synchrony 1
to the tune of an additional {$18.00} fee for a 'replacement ' money order. I was charged a {$10.00} Returned Check fee by my credit union. Taking into consideration the {$3.00} per month 'Service Charge ' retroactive to the original purchase date equating to {$39.00} 1
to the XXXX 1
to the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX for {$2100.00}. I received the check for the dealership but never received the check for the tax. 1
to their automated system but it could not find the account number. But it connected me with a XXXX Agent. I asked him specifically if the application supplied to them by XXXX included the applicant 's phone number and if so was it different from the phone number I was contacting them on - ( XXXX ) XXXX. He said that tireAgent had not supplied the applicant 's phone number. Only XXXX 's phone number was provided. He then said he had to transfer me to their fraud department/specialist to assist me '. XXXX would not assist me and was argumentative. He claimed that the application from XXXX did include their customer 's phone number 1
to them if that 's the case 2
to them it 's just a process and a procedure 1
to then have us go through XXXX for months to fix what they permitted. Again 2
to then pay a Balloon Payment thats more than prior balance and what the house is worth!?! Shown below are the unconscionable Final Loan Modification terms. Simply put 1
to third parties without my express 3
to this conditional acceptance upon proof 2
to this date JPMorgan Chase Bank never responded to my written notice of these errors sent on XX/XX/XXXX. 1
to this day 3
to those who are willing to pay for their services. Pursuant to the statue listed above 2
to to correct 1
to top that off ... The customer is forced to actually lie 1
to track the status of the deposit 1
to transfer seven transactions to a private person named XXXX XXXX and another XX/XX/2021 transfer of {$20000.00} to a person named XXXX XXXX. I got all the transfers cancelled except one for {$160.00} to XXXX XXXX. Citibank in a letter to me on XX/XX/2021 1
to transmit 2
to Transunion 1
to trick someone into opening a card 1
to try again later. I waited an hour and tried again 1
to try and properly resolve the situation. Until I stopped payment 1
to try to resolve the dispute. This is theft! They can not do this! XXXX XXXX paid money for rent and occupied the unit for one month. Then a month later 1
to try to resolve this. I have only the general phone nbr given on my bank statements. 1
to try to see what could be done along the line of a payment arrangement. I spoke to someone who referred to themselves as a Manage named XXXX 1
to unblock the issue. 1
to unlock my access to my account on the WU website 1
to update the amount to {$1100.00} and was told they'd submitted the update request and it may take a few days. 1
to uphold the privacy and security of customers nonpublic personal information ( 15 USC 6801 ). 3
to upload 1
to upload the inspection. The inspector assigns a percentage completed 1
to us 1
to us which is going to be on the 1
to use that as legal standing is once again deceptive and simply incorrect. 1
to use the credit. That same day 1
to use XXXX with this account and was never notified by the bank that XXXX was being used with my account. 1
TO VACATE THE JUDGMENT YOU GOT AGAINST ME. AND I AM CONFIDENT THAT HAD I BEEN ABLE TO FILE THAT MOTION BEFORE THE DEADLINE ( AS I HAD FULLY INTENDED 1
to validate my identity and substantiate my claim. However 37
to validate my XXXX and substantiate my claim. However 1
to validate the veracity of my claim.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
to validate XXXX XXXX and substantiate my claim. However 2
to vendor. With each one saying It seems like you have been transferred to the wrong department 1
to verify any account you are reporting on. Nor is it my responsibility to verify the account! 3
to verify any funding instructions received. We are not responsible for any wires sent by you to an incorrect bank account. 1
to verify disputed items through reasonable reinvestigation 3
to verify her knowledge of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
to verify it wasnt me in the store making the purchase. I was also informed me that there were no notes nor any indication Citibank N.A. /AAdvantage had done any investigations on this incident 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related