2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 901–950 of 13.5K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
that it is only 8 more months of PMI that I have to pay and to just XXXX it up. 1
that it isn't an automated system in which I get a call. So I called Chase back Sunday morning XX/XX/2023 to find out why I was never contacted. I was told they could not tell me since the account had been closed 1
that it might be a mistake from their end & not to be concern. 1
that it not their fault 1
that it requires attorneys fees and expenses incurred to be reasonable and necessary. The amount of the default pursuant to which Santander initiated the foreclosure was {$550.00}. See attached the XXXX XXXX. The value of the subject property was ten times greater than the amount of the debt. Based on these facts it was not reasonable or necessary for Santander to initiate a foreclosure and to incur {$5600.00} in attorneys fees and costs as a result thereof. 1
that it seems Captial Ones one hand doesnt know what the other hand is doing and the messages arent getting to the places they need to in order resolve this 1
that it should be listed.,,Ocwen Financial Corporation,PA,190XX,,Consent provided,Web,2016-09-25,Closed with explanation,Yes,Yes,2129795 1
that it took a couple of months for the system to update. ... 11. I called every time a new statement came for months and received the same response each time. ... 12. In XXXX or XXXX of this year 1
that it was a last-min. deal. But still 1
that it was a one time only special which induced us to hold it 1
that it was all a phishing scheme to pinpoint my personal identity 1
that it was listing the property for sale so the loan could be paid off and would continue the original loan payments ( of $ XXXX. ) in the meantime. 1
that it was my fault for making biweekly payments - I asked to speak with a supervisor - the rep stated the supervisor was not in until XXXX XXXX. 1
that it was obviously fraudulent based on the address alone 1
that it was only required prior to a hearing. I then asked him several more times 1
that it was open and being purged and also that it was closed. I explained I very much needed all my accounts closed 1
that it was their mistake 1
that it was their numbers attached to the calls and I knew it was either them or my info had been stolen in the breach and they and I were being Spoofed. No acknowledgement of my problem. I just got the regurgitated word-for-word in the response about the Data Breach from the letter they had already sent me about the Data Breach. No acknowledgement. It was completely word-for-word 1
that it was unprofessional and ridiculous for them to be expecting the customer to keep waiting for SO LONG ( maybe a 1/4th of a year ) to pay his missing and justly earned cashback rewards! She essentially told me that there was nothing she could do and that I would have to wait 1
that it would all be fixed in XXXX hours. In 8 weeks 1
that it would be 4-5 days for the money to clear. I was told by the person on the phone that he would follow up with me by Thursday to update the progress of the check. As of Friday evening 1
that it would be in the mail. I've never attempted to reinstate this this loan in any way after XX/XX/XXXX. I only requested records 1
that it would be reflected soon and there would be no penalties because of this transfer. I believed them at the time and gave them them benefit of the doubt. 1
that it would happen automatically in 60 days. I said fine 1
that it would most likely be postponed to allow for the short sale of my home. 1
that it would take 14-20 days to return via mail the initial deposits in a cashier check. The initial deposit was {$100.00} USD in each account 1
that it would take 5-10 days for the invoice to arrive and asked if I would like to arrange payment in the meantime. At this point I was thinking that this was a scam. ( XX/XX/XXXX call time 2 minutes ) On XX/XX/XXXX I received another call from the same number and operator regarding the same debt. I informed him that I had not received the invoice and was not convinced that it was a legitimate debt. He again insisted that it was legitimate and that I arrange payment. He also insisted that I should have received the invoice even though he had initially indicated that it would take 5-10 days. I informed him that I had not and hung up. ( XX/XX/XXXX call time 6 minutes ) On XX/XX/XXXX I called my insurance company and the hospital that I had been taken to and neither had any record of an ambulance billing. I was eventually able to get the get the name of the ambulance service and contact them. ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ). I asked them to send me an invoice and was told that it had been sent to collections. ( Again 1
that it would take up to 3 months to fully close the account.,,CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION,VA,23323,,Consent provided,Web,2023-03-23,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,6738596 1
that its being placed where it corresponds. Every month theres a shortage or drastic amount of money that we owe 1
that its records indicate a refund has been issued. This alleged credit by the merchant has not been posted 1
that lead me to call both Capital One ( spoke with XXXX 1
that left me a tremendous harm and somehow benefit the bank it didn't benefit me in anyway and was a very cruell thing to do to a senior citizen 1
that letter was 10 years ago and seeing that none this type of fraud had taken place I thought you heard me and did as I required! You didnt though and you opened the door to even more gift card fraud and 3rd party payments as time went along. How shameful! 1
that letter was from XXXX XXXX .... later XXXX send me a card call XXXX XXXX 1
that letter was set to the wrong address 1
that literally caused the housing crash and damage of XXXX. So even though the illegal closing 1
that loans are automatically discharged to somehow extend their investigation to XXXX XXXX XXXX so that they are. 1
that looked it was painted over 1
that lost money 1
that lowers my credit score. i am very upset 1
that made no sense because this home has a reverse mortgage on it & there's a Will excluding him from her assets that I sent to the Court when I was asking if I even needed to go through probate when she has no assets. I can't imagine a judge giving a person permission '' to break into a home that they supposedly inherited ''. 1
that maintaining that data is a convenience to Venmo. The prevention of signing up again was also the reason Ms. XXXX gave the XXXX XXXX XXXX in responding to my complaint. 1
that makes no sense other than XXXX maliciously trying to deceive me out of {$1800.00}.,,Rowland Avenue Management 1
that may be incurred if the delinquency is not cured ; An account history showing 1
that may have been granted to Experian 1
that may have been granted to XXXX 3
that may have been previously granted to Experian and XXXX XXXX XXXX. It is noteworthy that XXXX XXXX XXXX failed to apprise me of my right to exercise the nondisclosure option 1
that may have been previously granted to XXXX and American Honda Finance. It is noteworthy that American Honda Finance failed to apprise me of my right to exercise the nondisclosure option 1
that may have knowledge of any information. They stated they were all verified even after demanding a reinvestigation which they have not conducted a proper investigation according to law. All information is still not reporting 100 % accurate in accord to 15 USC 1681 and everything must be accurate,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
that may have prevented them from protecting my financial safety ; ( ii ) Page XXXX of XXXX XX/XX/XXXX whether by virtue of CashApps custodianship over my funds or by its control over them 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →