2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 7.3K–7.3K of 13.5K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
there was nothing he could do. 1
there was nothing he could do. I could either submit another written dispute 2
there was NOTHING posted on my Truist account to indicate the deposit would be withheld or post-dated. Due to Truist refusing to release MY own funds ( court ordered remind you ) without providing the customer ( me ) with a timely explanation 1
there was nothing she could do. She advised me that if BOA removed the late payment 1
there was nothing Sofi could do to honor the original offer that I received. Frankly 1
there was nothing that they were willing to do. Despite this 1
there was nothing they could do because they had already paid the party the money. 1
there was nothing they could do. I then requested to speak to a supervisor again. The representative informed me 1
there was nothing Vystar could do for me and with regard to me contacting the CFPB he can't tell me what to do that was up to me.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,VYSTAR CREDIT UNION,FL,32205,,Consent provided,Web,2022-09-26,Closed with monetary relief,Yes,N/A,6019278 1
there was one notice with the appropriate accompanied XXXX affidavit. But we had received two both dated the same date 1
there was one {$40.00} returned check fee from XXXX that XXXX refused to waive. Chase refused to provide any type of reimbursement for that {$40.00} fee. 1
there was only one card being used consistently at the same stores. At the time the card was being used consistently 1
there was only one credit card issued for this account. 1
there was over {$2000.00} in my Citibank savings account 1
there was over {$700.00} in the escrow account. As of that evening 1
there was plenty if indication to GM to know that I had moved and that they could have told me if there was any special steps I needed to take. Putting aside that it shouldn't be my responsibility for them to properly administrate their loans. 1
there was supposed to be a face-to-face meeting with an FHA representative to see if there was a way to resolve everything without foreclosure. That never took place 1
there was XXXX issue after another. A XXXX ton of miscommunication ( I would be told different things by different people ) followed by several extra payments 1
there was {$0.00} reported with that servicer. I never received an explanation or documentation regarding the temporary loss of {$90000.00}. 1
there wasn't an error even though I sent a copy of the report to their dispute department. In addition 4
there wasn't much that could be done. He even told to call my brothers ( the only family I have left ) to pay down some of the debt I have and maybe that would help push the mortgage through ( {$5000.00} ). It's not that easy! Even if my brothers had that amount 1
there wasnt a negative balance sure.,,Chime Financial Inc,GA,30349,Servicemember,Consent provided,Web,2023-09-28,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,7625496 1
there wasnt a negative balance sure.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,GA,30349,Servicemember,Consent provided,Web,2023-09-28,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,7623313 1
there wasnt a XXXX balance sure.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
there wasnt a XXXX balance sure.,,EQUIFAX 1
there were 2 things that stuck out like a sore thumb. 1. The date read XX/XX/XXXX. That may have been when my business contracted with XXXX for service but never guaranteed personally. So 1
there were 7 months of electronic statements ( XXXX thru XXXX ) in which XXXX charged my account for late payment fees and interest running up the account to a total {$370.00} 3
there were absolutely no changes made on my deed/title itself 1
there were absolutely XXXX late payments ( this is going back over 20 years ago? We didn't randomly get irresponsible after 20 years 1
there were additional requests that I was never told about prior to speaking with Ms. XXXX. 1
there were credit issues 1
there were delays in the process due to requests for documentation 1
there were errors related to this transaction 1
there were expecting another power of attorney from a second person who they believed co-own my car ; they read the names of that person and I told them all the names they see are mines and they can double check that with my ID on Capital One file - I was even asked to mail my wedding certificate to the title department which I did. But surprisingly someone else again called me ( I believe XX/XX/XXXX ) about same thing 1
there were insufficient funds to cover this recurring debit which 1. Per BB & Ts own policies will not be covered by its overdraft review policies since I am opted in by default and have never opted out ; 2. Therefore 1
there were more and more requests from the lender. If I was going to close the house with this lender 1
there were no additional fraudulent charges shown since the initial XXXX 1
there were no consequences for someone changing my name and using my identity. He hacked my device. I believe he was using my credit to obtain a XXXX XXXX XXXX through XXXX. I noticed he had a XXXX XXXX XXXX on his phone in XXXX to XXXX which is strictly a paid for Equifax program that I most certainly did not do. I knew XXXX XXXX did not have any credit and I was the only one with credit. When I asked him 1
there were no findings. Claiming res ipsa loquitur while only confirming information supporting your bias is by no means an investigation. Its 1
There were no flags or holds against it. 1
there were no further payments dispensed to GM. I presumed that the lease was over 1
there were no jobs. 1
there were no restrictions that would have prevented you from accessing your account online. 1
there were no statements or communications about this loan up until now 1
there were no subsequent transaction attempts after the debit card number and checking account were closed 1
there were only two recognizable phone numbers that communicated with me 1
there were random charges being placed against the account before I even got the card in my hand it is questionable as to what is actually happening with my account : as such 1
there were some irregular procedures made here and I insist I counted {$1800.00} twice and that was the amount of money given to the teller. I would like to get a neutral analysis for this case because I can't trust and don't believe that thing she told me. She even told that by looking at the cash given to the teller in the video 1
there were times when the extension given by the person who handles my case did not work. 1
there were two instances where they transferred us to completely wrong numbers. In other words 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →