Total complaints
1
Filed since Ther
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows there were 2 things that stuck out like a sore thumb. 1. The date read XX/XX/XXXX. That may have been when my business contracted with XXXX for service but never guaranteed personally. So's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Ther. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since Ther
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How there were 2 things that stuck out like a sore thumb. 1. The date read XX/XX/XXXX. That may have been when my business contracted with XXXX for service but never guaranteed personally. So's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| and they still will not remove this debt. The fraud creditor is surprisingly not going away when they know they have been exposed of their fraud practices of forgery and false contract. Here is the scenario : The Creditor name is Zion Debt Holdings. They recovered a debt from XXXX XXXX | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| this contract show that it was signed in XX/XX/XXXX. Here is why it is a fraud contract. I changed my name in XXXX. My name before the name change was XXXX XXXX XXXX. Now if I was going to sign any contract | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| no problem. Since it is a business and not a personal liability | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
there were 2 things that stuck out like a sore thumb. 1. The date read XX/XX/XXXX. That may have been when my business contracted with XXXX for service but never guaranteed personally. So has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Ther, and the most recent logged activity is There are , giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, there were 2 things that stuck out like a sore thumb. 1. The date read XX/XX/XXXX. That may have been when my business contracted with XXXX for service but never guaranteed personally. So reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "and they still will not remove this debt. The fraud creditor is surprisingly not going away when they know they have been exposed of their fraud practices of forgery and false contract. Here is the scenario : The Creditor name is Zion Debt Holdings. They recovered a debt from XXXX XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "no problem. Since it is a business and not a personal liability".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating there were 2 things that stuck out like a sore thumb. 1. The date read XX/XX/XXXX. That may have been when my business contracted with XXXX for service but never guaranteed personally. So: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
there were 2 things that stuck out like a sore thumb. 1. The date read XX/XX/XXXX. That may have been when my business contracted with XXXX for service but never guaranteed personally. So has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
there were 2 things that stuck out like a sore thumb. 1. The date read XX/XX/XXXX. That may have been when my business contracted with XXXX for service but never guaranteed personally. So has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against there were 2 things that stuck out like a sore thumb. 1. The date read XX/XX/XXXX. That may have been when my business contracted with XXXX for service but never guaranteed personally. So is "no problem. Since it is a business and not a personal liability" in the "and they still will not remove this debt. The fraud creditor is surprisingly not going away when they know they have been exposed of their fraud practices of forgery and false contract. Here is the scenario : The Creditor name is Zion Debt Holdings. They recovered a debt from XXXX XXXX" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.