2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 5.6K–5.6K of 13.5K

Company Complaints
the SEC 1
the second agent should have informed me of the change and not confirm that my flight was still leaving the initial day I wanted to change. This is obviously a FRAUD allegedly committed by Amex because the travel agency is affiliated with them. They still refuse to refund me the first fee when their agent ( all from overseas who dont seem trained ) messed up.,,AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY,NJ,07306,,Consent provided,Web,2023-04-11,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,6827661 1
the second check from XXXX XXXX arrived. This doubled the amount of the loss ; the reimbursement from XXXX XXXX now exceeded the balance of my mortgage. The amount reflected the costs that were detailed in the contract I uploaded originally. I was told it was now a complete loss and I had to request to rebuild. I was told I had to provide a letter stating that I would complete the work that was detailed in the contract I uploaded in XXXX. I needed a second letter from the contractor stating he would do the work detailed in the contract. On XX/XX/XXXX I uploaded the letters. I called on XX/XX/XXXX and was told the letters were not processed yet 1
the second in a phone conversation ) 1
The Second Lien Modification Program ( 2MP ) 1
the second part of my payment was processed for the XX/XX/XXXX payment. On XX/XX/XXXX 1
the second redirecting me to this online department. She redirected me back to Deposit Review 1
the second time I contacted them or the third time. I'm unsure whether it was the third or fourth time contacting them when I requesting a copy of my chat transcript 1
the SECOND TRANSACTION SHOULD BE CANCELLED. Please provide confirmation when this is complete. Thanks. 1
the Secretary may pay in advance interest on the public debt by a period of not more than one year 1
the Secretary of the Treasury 2
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 13 3
The Securities Exchange Commission 2
the security agreement or similar instrument ) so provides 1
the security deposit of {$1200.00} was deducted but does not appear to be properly applied toward these alleged charges.,,National Credit Systems 1
the security interest associated with this account 1
The Security Interest in the Collateral is granted to secure the Notes ( and the related obligations under this Indenture ) 1
the seller can not immediately charge a purchase to the gift card and then falsely claim that I sent a used gift card with less than the original {$100.00} balance remaining -- -when the gift card completes the activation waiting period and becomes valid 1
the seller of a duly authorized payment. 1
the seller still has a hold on my credit. This is not something that can be planned for on my end and has nothing to do with when I made the purchases on my end. Nonetheless 1
the seller ultimately denied responsibility and refused to issue a refund. 1
the seller was a broker ; she and the realtor had an employer-employee relationship. 5. After contacting Sun West about being a possible victim of fraud and predatory lending '' 1
the Seller was sent notifications via email and the Resolution Center advising them you had disputed the Payment and asking for them to work directly with you toward a resolution. On XX/XX/XXXX 1
the sender 1
The sender stated that they did not make this purchase. '' The buyer initiated a chargeback 1
the service agent requested to go back and confirm possible fraudulent purchases 1
the Service is available on your Card Account if you elect to participate ( opt in ) and you have met each of the activation and eligibility requirements described below. If you opt in 1
the service member 's state of legal residence 4
the service of the suit has been cancelled '' My complaint is unfair debt collection practices as well as using intimidation tactics to influence the actions of an alleged debtor. Filing a lawsuit with full knowledge that the debt verification process was pending and incomplete as well as refusing to provide documents that would verify the debt 1
the service or product 237
the service representative indicated that I was now in a pay ahead '' status. She explained that my additional payments 1
the service representative regretfully informed me that although it made no sense 1
the service representative told me a supervisor would contact me to see if they could recall the bill from collections. A supervisor called me on XX/XX/XXXX and told me they would not recall the bill from the collections agency. When I asked them to send me an written 1
The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act ( 50 U.S.C. 3901-4043 ) 3
the servicer actually conducted a foreclosure sale. In all of the cases discussed above 1
the Servicer and the Investor of my loan have set loan modification terms that are impossible to accept for anyone in my position because I do not have {$21000.00}. I am sure nobody affected by XXXX has that amount of money available in a bank account. With the inflation and the consequences of the Pandemic 1
the servicer charged me penalties in exactly that amount 1
the servicer denied further forbearance 1
the servicer had actual knowledge of the debtors bankruptcy case and discharge 1
the servicer has continued to impose procedural requirements and delays without providing the requested written explanations or records. 1
the servicer is not the real party of interest and does not have standing to foreclose on my property. Right Path Servicing INC has sent me a fraudulent copy of the mortgage deed and promissory note 1
the Servicer made false claims stating that they received all the account information the department of education and that the department of education was the one reporting the information to NSLDS. When I refused to accept that answer 1
the servicer made the first ARM adjustment in XXXX XXXX and even that interest rate was calculated incorrectlyWe have all the basic mortgage fraud issues including original loan not endorsed 1
the servicer must provide the borrower with the inputs used in the calculation. 1
the servicer of the above-referenced mortgage loan 1
the servicer responded that they are proceeding with the review '' regardless of my objections and will assess the {$100.00} fee without my authorization. They stated this is standard process '' they can not waive '' because doing so would constitute preferential treatment. '' This language indicates they have systematically charged this improper fee to other borrowers for federally exempt transfers.The servicer is creating an unauthorized debt by proceeding with a fee I have repeatedly refused to consent to. They are charging me for administrative notation of a three-year-old federally exempt transfer that their systems failed to recognize earlier. This is not a bona fide service requiring paymentit is an arbitrary fee extracted for acknowledging what federal law already requires them to recognize.,,FIRST UNITED BANK AND TRUST COMPANY,OK,73034,,Consent provided,Web,2025-11-19,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,17374256 1
the servicer sent the borrower notices implying the borrower is in imminent default. One of the notices was placed on the borrowers door 1
the servicer shall provide the obligor 1
the servicer should have set aside funds for taxes and insurance. 1
the servicer simultaneously issued conclusions that rely on unresolved accounting inconsistencies. The decision-making process lacks transparency and appears inconsistent with Fannie Mae servicing requirements and RESPA obligations . I am requesting that the CFPB require Mr. Cooper to : Conduct a full and documented escrow and payment reconciliation Correct any servicing errors affecting balances and affordability calculations Acknowledge and address prior correspondence and submissions Confirm that foreclosure activity is fully paused while errors are under review Provide a clear written explanation of how all figures used in the loss mitigation review were calculated I am acting in good faith and seeking clarity 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related