2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: S

Companies starting with S that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

5.5K companies starting with "S"

Showing 5.3K–5.3K of 5.5K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
suggesting a data transfer or reporting error. 3
suggesting a lack of due diligence by XXXX in verifying any alleged address to which they purport to have mailed any collection notice. XXXX. SUPPORTING FACTS Initial Dispute Submission to TransUnion Date : XX/XX/XXXX Filed As : CFPB XXXX Action : Direct dispute regarding the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX account submitted to TransUnion through XXXX CFPB Complaint Portal XXXX TransUnion 's Response to CFPB XXXX Date : XX/XX/XXXX Action : TransUnion responded XXXX stating that the disputed information was not currently on Complainant 's TransUnion credit report 1
suggesting a misuse of my personal information without my consent. FCRA Standards Violation : Accurate and fair reporting of credit information is a cornerstone of the FCRA. The actions by XXXX 1
suggesting address fraud ). 1
suggesting an open status. These conflicting statuses require investigation and clarification to ensure accurate reporting. 3
suggesting coercion and possible collusion 1
suggesting copied or fabricated evidence Despite this 1
suggesting errors and possibly fraudulent activity.,,EQUIFAX 1
suggesting errors and possibly fraudulent activity.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,GA,30315,,Consent provided,Web,2025-01-20,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,11618050 1
suggesting errors and possibly fraudulent activity.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
suggesting fraud via identity theft or reporting errors. Extrapolating from attached report pages ( Experian XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
suggesting it was either removed or never reported 1
suggesting misleading charge-off behavior Reporting of unverifiable delinquencies beyond seven-year limits 1
suggesting potential foreclosure 1
suggesting that data was never validated or uniformly transmitted. This disparity demonstrates a breakdown in accuracy procedures required by FCRA 607 ( B ) 3
suggesting that home ownership might be possible and requested my financial information again 1
suggesting that I had to have received it. Also that they mailed to me '' a copy of the default judgment in XXXX of XXXX. And with the validation request they only included a judgment copy from XXXX. No bills or other proof of anything. They did however include a massive increase total for the judgment pay-off amount totaling {$9700.00} in their response. 1
suggesting that I reach out to XXXX for further assistance. Frustrated and recognizing the futility of pursuing help from both Wells Fargo and XXXX 1
suggesting that the lenders did not report incorrect information to Equifax only. 1
suggesting that there was no legal basis for freezing XXXX XXXX 's funds in the first place. But despite the fact Citibank N.A. London stated in the letter 1
suggesting that there was no legal basis for freezing XXXX XXXX 's funds in the first place. But despite the fact Citibank XXXX. XXXX stated in the letter 1
suggesting this is a systemic issue.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL,PA,XXXXX,,Consent provided,Web,2025-05-19,Closed with monetary relief,Yes,N/A,13589899 1
suggesting this may be partial settlement or portion of that debt. I sent debt validation requests under FDCPA Section 809 ( b ) to both entities in XX/XX/XXXX requesting proof they own/are authorized to collect debt 3
suggestions 1
suggestions to call the police 1
suggests a clear bias in favor off the merchant during this investigation. In the absence of any documentation from the merchant justifying their failure to issue a timely credit 1
suggests a fundamental error in Truists data processing and further questions the accuracy of their records. Truists letter offers no explanation 1
suggests issues on their end 1
suggests negligence or unfairly targeted scrutiny. The refusal to provide written justification and the conflicting information from different bank departments further highlight poor practices. 1
suggests potential disparate treatment. 1
suggests Shellpoint is running out the clock to avoid mitigation 1
suggests that they are aware of the issue and the burden it places on members. 1
suing for debts that were not enforceable in the first place. 4
suing or threatening legal action against consumers without offering or possessing required documentation 1
SUISSE BANCORP 1
suit or proceeding ) is asserted by such director 1
suitable and more than adhering of Federal and state reporting laws and or fairness in your docile adhering to the mandatorily followed credit reporting industrys codes namely the XXXX own XXXX detailed Metro2 Formatted reporting without deviation ( s ) 3
suitable and more than adhering of Federal and state reporting laws and or fairness in your docile adhering to the mandatorily followed credit reporting industrys codes namely the XXXX own XXXX detailed XXXX Formatted reporting without deviation ( s ) 1
SUITS 1
suits filed 1
Sullivan & Terranova 4
Sullivan Asset Management, LLC 14
Sulphur Bank Rancheria Enterprises 44
Sum Investments, Inc. 6
summarizing and reporting Midlands data. 1
summary judgment must be granted as to this claim. 3
Summerfield Mortgage, LLC 2
SUMMIT A R ( XXXX 1
Summit A*R, Inc. 364
Summit Account & Computer Service, Inc. 4

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter S that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →