2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: N

Companies starting with N that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

4.3K companies starting with "N"

Showing 3.7K–3.8K of 4.3K

Company Complaints
not the ticket vendor I interacted with online. 1
not the untenable hike that caused me to request immediate recalculation. Had the letter not incorrectly informed me 1
not the US 1
not the wallet which included the driver 's license. I was then told by Chase that it would 4 business days to resolve. However 1
NOT the XXXX CD rate. If Synchrony is going to use a term with a different meaning than the industry standard 1
not the XXXX that it should be. 1
not the {$1200.00} which I was previously quoted. My loan went from a principle balance of {$170000.00} to now being {$210000.00}. And again 1
not the {$300.00} bill I received from his office yesterday 1
not the {$4.00} charge 1
not the {$760.00}. I printed off a copy of the XXXX XXXX transaction ( {$760.00} ) 1
not the {$880.00} as they state. 1
not their federally funded loan -- I had even been in touch with their employees over this process and was never told about it. My father cosigned for me 1
not their organization 1
not theirs. I am simply asking them to check their records and see that the payment they sent me has NOT been cashed 1
not them. Since XXXX made it clear that it was not their responsibility 1
not these corrupt banks and their servicers. When none of these banks/servicers can produce even one ( 1 ) valid contract between XXXX and me while I hold three ( 3 ) separate ones + the documentation supporting my payoffs 1
not thinking that the car policy is wrong as well 1
not third party proof according to the Fair Credit Reporting Act 3
not this redacted version of a document 1
not through any objective measures such as a credit profile/financial resources analysis. 1
not through automated matching systems. Any continued reporting without proof will be treated as willful noncompliance under FCRA 616 and 617 1
not through email 1
not through hostile call-center scripts and contradictory statements.,,CLGF Holdco 1 1
not through my card 1
not through the e-Oscar automated dispute system. An e-Oscar verified stamp is not legal validation under FCRA. 1
NOT THROUGH THE MAIL 1
not tied to my legal residence records Law : FCRA 611 and CFPB Regulation V require XXXX to ensure consumer file reflects accurate current and historical addresses Story : This address being listed causes database mismatches when lenders do address verification 1
not to accept the return 1
not to an address associated with me 1
not to avoid paying a debt that I owe 1
not to be less than 12 months Take into account any remaining unpaid amount of the Escrow shortage in any subsequent Escrow analysis to ensure that the Borrower is able to continue to pay all Escrow shortage amounts over the remaining portion of either the current remaining Escrow shortage repayment period or a period up to 60 months. The Servicer may not accelerate or compress the remaining Escrow shortage amount into a new Escrow payment or shorter repayment period as a result of a future Escrow analysis. 1
not to be taken lightly. I understand why an Equifax or XXXX whould choose to deny involvement 1
not to be taken lightly. I understand why an XXXX or Experian whould choose to deny involvement 1
not to be taken lightly. I understand why an XXXX or XXXX whould choose to deny involvement 1
not to charge another annual fee of {$59.00} due to my impending account cancellation 1
not to collection costs. 1
Not to cut you off 1
not to even take any action 4
not to exceed the lesser of {$500000.00} or 1 per cent of the net worth of the debt collector ; and ( 3 ) in the case of any successful action to enforce the foregoing liability 1
not to exceed the lesser of {$500000.00} or 1 per centum of the net worth of the debt collector ; 1
not to exceed the lesser of {$500000.00} or 1 per centum of the net worth of the debt collector ; and ( 3 ) in the case of any successful action to enforce the foregoing liability 52
not to exceed the lesser of {$500000.00} or 1 per centum of the net worth of the debt collector ; and ( XXXX ) in the case of any successful action to enforce the foregoing liability 2
not to exceed the lesser of {$500000.00} or 1 per centum of the net worth of the debt collector ; and 15 U.S. Code 1692 - Congressional findings and declaration of purpose ( a ) Abusive practices There is abundant evidence of the use of abusive 1
not to exceed the lesser of {$500000.00} or 1 per centum of the net worth of the debt collector ; and 16 CFR 433.2 - Preservation of consumers ' claims and defenses 1
not to exceed the lesser of {$500000.00} or 1 per centum of the net worth of the debt collector ; and In addition 3
not to exceed the lesser of {$500000.00} or 1 per centum of the net worth of the debt collector. 1
not to exceed the lesser of {$500000.00} or XXXX per centum of the net worth of the debt collector ; and ( XXXX ) in the case of any successful action to enforce the foregoing liability 6
not to exceed the lesser of {$XXXX} or 1 per centum of the net worth of the debt collector ; and ( 3 ) in the case of any successful action to enforce the foregoing liability 2
not to manipulate the rules 1
not to me personally. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter N that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related