2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: N

Companies starting with N that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

4.3K companies starting with "N"

Showing 3.7K–3.7K of 4.3K

Company Complaints
not that it does any good anyway 1
not that they did n't have right to non-child support money but have to at least provide notification prior to taking it. 1
not the accounts that generate the receivables. The financial institution retains legal ownership of the credit card accounts and can continue to change the terms on the accounts. Accounts 1
not the actual XXXX XXXX form. 1
not the bank 1
not the bank 's 1
not the borrower 1
not the Chase Credit card issuer. 1
not the circuit courts. 1
not the client. Therefore 1
not the consumer. Without evidence 1
not the consumers.,,CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP 1
NOT the credit card on file. This was completely unauthorized. I contacted XXXX who immediately acknowledged their error and reversed the charges and paypal 1
NOT the customer ; in addition 1
not the Customer relations personnel 1
not the customer. Its simply unfair to expect customers to bear the burden of getting the issue corrected. XXXX also failed to explain what the partial payment was and why it was unapplied. 1
NOT THE DAMAGE CHARGE I didn't find out about til later. The manager then started placing the blame on me saying she was doing me a favor I never told anyone I was coming with large dogs her hotel online says we need to call if we have dogs. That's all great but bottom line is I BOOKED MY STAY WITH XXXX XXXX OVER THE PHONE 1
not the date posted ( or the next day ). To make sure that this was not something I had done 1
not the debtor 1
not the Department of Education. 1
not the e-Oscar system. Any response generated by an automated tool is insufficient under FCRA. A generic letter claiming an item is verified '' without supporting documentation is not legal validation. 1
not the facts : Inaccurate. 3
not the full amount. etc..,,AFNI INC.,MN,55428,,Consent provided,Web,2018-02-07,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,2806131 1
NOT THE INFORMATION I WAS GIVEN. Now 1
not the initial loan amount nor the principal balance has ever been consistent. I 've been making payments to the address that the bankruptcy courts was sending the payments and now that last payment has been returned as undeliverable. The manager assigned to the loan makes promises to take action or send the information to another department to get results ( this is on a day that Im able to reach him ) yet 1
not the insurance company. Our contract is with Insurers 1
not the Law Fair Credit Reporting Act 2
NOT the lease payment from XXXX. 3
NOT THE LEAST OF WHICH IS THE LACK OF DOCUMENTATION DUE TO ITS AGE AND COMPROMISED AND CORRUPTED HISTORY AND IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE PLEASE PROVIDE FULL DOCUMENTATION TO SATISFY WHAT THE LAW WOULD REQUIRE AS YOUR BURDEN OF PROOF OF YOUR ALLEGATIONS IN THIS COMPLAINT. PLAINTIFFS CANT EXPLAIN 2
not the least of which is the lack of documentation due to its age and compromised and corrupted history and if this is not the case please provide full documentation to satisfy what the law would require as your burden of proof of your allegations in this complaint. Plaintiffs cant explain 1
not the lender 1
not the missing show niches - NOTHING. 1
not the modified loan amount. The remainder of the XXXX payment was put into the unapplied balance area where it has remained. I have contacted them multiple times regarding this issue. 1
not the Mortgage Company. I explained an insurance claim was not made and that a check was issued and sent to the mortgage company. They transferred me to the Insurance Department anyways and of course 1
NOT the ones I had selected when I was in the store. I immediately went to my local police department and to the FBI ( you have the original report to the FBI and the business card of my local police department. ) As I later learned 1
not the original value of the property. 1
not the other way around and I still do not have sound reasons why except that I mentioned CFPB escalation XXXX. They are auditing my account but have not received the results XXXX. Still no resolve why I didnt have a XXXX payment due XXXX. They insinuated there back office would determine the split between early principle payments then another representative stated I never asked XXXX. They had me on hold 1
not the other way around. 1
not the penfed check 1
not the people. 5
not the person at The XXXX XXXX. Chase Bank has investigated twice at your request 1
not the person who is actually using the card. This is one of the reasons why I contacted the merchant to get a verification or official statement stating that this is a fraudulent activity. 1
not the phone number on my online account with them. They said the collection department and online accounts don't link. 1
not the Plaintiff. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX was listed again as Plaintiff. They had to be since it was a continuance of the first foreclosure attempt 1
not the property 1
not the push notifications to email and phone that I had requested when originally creating the account. 1
NOT the quality. 4 ) The bank notice misrepresented the actions taken. They did not open an investigation. They did not request or receive anything from the merchant. 5 ) The manager was verbally abusive and unprofessional. 1
not the road to a pre-approval. 1
not the same thing. If I was a threat actor 1
not the sub-servicer ( XXXX XXXX ). 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter N that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related