2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: I

Companies starting with I that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

25.6K companies starting with "I"

Showing 25.3K–25.4K of 25.6K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
it would be below the 80 % threshold and I could call in to have the PMI removed. 1
it would be clear that it is impossible for me to have opened the account. 2
it would be Closed. 3
it would be considered 30 days late. She says a month represents 30 days no matter the actual calendar days and thats how its reported to the bureau 2
it would be extremely simple and fast to be able to enter the custodial wallet exchange through an external application that also supports the XXXX XXXX ( such as XXXX 1
it would be fairly simple to implement a control that allows users to only send money to accounts and people that were added and confirmed.,,Early Warning Services 1
it would be from XX/XX/XXXX 2
it would be in my account in minutes. PayPal is simply holding my money. I got the refund ... not PayPal ... so why does XXXX even give my money '' to PayPal? PayPal can withdraw money for payment in seconds 24/7/365 ... but they can not put a refund back in less than 21 days minimum ... I am sorry but that does not compute. It simply gives PayPal a free loan for 21 days and counting. PayPal is stalling 1
it would be just a few dollars and not to worry about it and to let it go. She even issued me a balance receipt showing the available and current balances were XXXX. Once home 1
it would be more current than what it is now. This report was just printed on XX/XX/XXXX 3
it would be my last day. My family and I would have stayed our entire reservation with no resolution whatsoever and a plethora of problems. The XXXX customer service representative said she would discuss this with local management and call me back. 1
IT WOULD BE MY RESPONSIBILITY TO PAY IT. Believe it or not 1
it would be reported as a positive payment on my credit report. 2
it would be reported to the credit bureau 1
it would be settled in a lump sum. He then claimed to take that back to The Entity that owed the debt to see if that would be acceptable to them and that if it was accepted that the civil case would be dropped 1
it would be sould crushing. XXXX NetSpend. Ask a sales associate what they've heard about people 's experience with NetSpend cards as a whole. Ask anywhere they're sold. Stick your head out your front door and yell anyone have any issues with NetSpend out here? '' Someone will warn you or share a story of headaches and unfulfilled needs regarding whoever it is answering these calls. NetSpend knows ... they probably knew before we even smelled trouble. They just didn't care. And THAT is where NetSpend became not just disappointing 1
it would be under investigation. 1
it would close itself and my {$1500.00} would be returned. 1
it would contact the applicant for clarification or to request supplemental documents. First Financial did not make any attempt to do this after we submitted the initial requested documents. 1
it would disqualify us from saving potentially hundreds of thousands in interest expenses later with a negative mark or in their case a collection amount for nearly {$40000.00}. Ultimately I want Harley to pursue the buyer and not myself. And to cut any obligations they think I have with them and stop harassing me. They reinstated a contractual debt that was paid and settled as agreed 1
it would disqualify us from saving potentially hundreds of thousands in interest expenses later with a negative mark or in their case a collection amount for nearly {$40000.00}. Ultimately I want XXXX to pursue the buyer and not myself. And to cut any obligations they think I have with them and stop harassing me. They reinstated a contractual debt that was paid and settled as agreed 2
it would fall under noncompliance as described in FCRA 616 ( wilful violations ) and 617 ( negligent violations ) 3
it would give me an error each and every time and I had to call an agent to do it manually. This is gon na be the same exact thing 1
it would have been clear without doubt that this vendor was not due more than a {$100.00} feed and they allowed this vendor to steal {$1100.00} so they should be liable.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,CITIBANK 1
it would have been fair. Identifying themselves as Lease Loyalty '' makes it sound like they're conducting a survey or something 1
it would have been in vain. 1
it would have been paid 1
it would have been recorded in the countys official records. 1
it would have been resolved by now. Meanwhile 1
it would have been XXXX before I completed a payment plan for {$1200.00} balance. Although assured me it would not affect my credit report because of the payment plan. Barclays did not tell the truth about payment plan especially the interest without derogatory information on my credit report. On XX/XX/XXXX 1
it would have honored the promotion. 1
it would have posted to my Capital One account to cover those purchases. Unfortunately 1
it would have prevented the delinquent payments. Now 1
it would have to be late first. As you can see the alleged accounts have been reporting as closed and in collections so why is payment history still reporting to the alleged account. 1
it would likely preclude our ability to execute a refinance. I understand these accruals/fees are perfectly legal ; however 1
it would likely push us into foreclosure. 1
it would make sense to increase our payment right there and then around XX/XX/XXXX instead of waiting for 9 months to increase our mortgage payments. This is a SCAM! 1
it would make the amount owed {$2100.00} then minus the cashed checks listed above in the amount of {$250.00} 2
it would mean I might have missed 1 payment overall. 1
it would not appear on my account. They also said there appeared to be a new device that had been added to my account 1
it would not have given me all relevant information needed to avoid missing the appeal deadline. Once I pointed out that no where on the letter did it say there was a 120-day deadline to appeal 1
it would not have incurred the late fee. I asked what government agency had oversight over their operations. The agent declined to tell me 1
it would not let me in even though it was the correct number. I believe I also talked to them on XXXX as well. 1
it would not return to what it was 1
it would now cost us even more because of the time that had passed while we were waiting for XXXX promised call. 1
it would only be my set amount 1
it would only show as far back as XX/XX/XXXX. I decided to look further back and learned that these charges went back to XX/XX/XXXX. I provided the date each charge was processed 1
it would only start the process over again and delay it further. After this there was still no answer and took another three calls to find out that the application had been closed because they were missing paperwork that I did not know was missing because I was not told and through this time of process no one called to tell me or sent me any notice that anything was missing and after talking for more then an hour to this older XXXX american man in his late XXXX XXXX to early XXXX XXXX who went through countless emails and notes told me finally that one page did not come through and told me what it was 1
it would require my signature or formal notice 2
it would result in my XXXX payment being reflected as past due. I was also advised they had discrepancies and issues with statements in XXXX incorrectly reflecting the correct amount due 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter I that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →