Total complaints
1
Filed since Duri
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows it would likely preclude our ability to execute a refinance. I understand these accruals/fees are perfectly legal ; however's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Duri. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since Duri
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How it would likely preclude our ability to execute a refinance. I understand these accruals/fees are perfectly legal ; however's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| we have been treated very poorly by all owners of this loan. All have been unwilling to work with us and the game plan has seemed to be to keep our credit damaged to eliminate our ability to refinance in order to protect the high rate of interest and to keep generating interest accrual/late fee income. I have long felt that XXXXs actions were inconsistent with the UDAAP and perhaps even the ECOA but we were reluctant to pursue a complaint with the CFPB. Our concern was that if a complaint was unsuccessful | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| I believe that XXXX employed unfair and abusive practices in accumulating them. Moreover | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| CFPB and all the states attorney generals covering UDAAP violations of the exact nature we were subjected to. I did not learn about this until the expiration of the settlement process and can not fathom why we would have been excluded other than perhaps deception on XXXXs part. In spite of this | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
it would likely preclude our ability to execute a refinance. I understand these accruals/fees are perfectly legal ; however has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Duri, and the most recent logged activity is During the, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, it would likely preclude our ability to execute a refinance. I understand these accruals/fees are perfectly legal ; however reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "we have been treated very poorly by all owners of this loan. All have been unwilling to work with us and the game plan has seemed to be to keep our credit damaged to eliminate our ability to refinance in order to protect the high rate of interest and to keep generating interest accrual/late fee income. I have long felt that XXXXs actions were inconsistent with the UDAAP and perhaps even the ECOA but we were reluctant to pursue a complaint with the CFPB. Our concern was that if a complaint was unsuccessful", and the single most common underlying issue is "CFPB and all the states attorney generals covering UDAAP violations of the exact nature we were subjected to. I did not learn about this until the expiration of the settlement process and can not fathom why we would have been excluded other than perhaps deception on XXXXs part. In spite of this".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating it would likely preclude our ability to execute a refinance. I understand these accruals/fees are perfectly legal ; however: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
it would likely preclude our ability to execute a refinance. I understand these accruals/fees are perfectly legal ; however has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
it would likely preclude our ability to execute a refinance. I understand these accruals/fees are perfectly legal ; however has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against it would likely preclude our ability to execute a refinance. I understand these accruals/fees are perfectly legal ; however is "CFPB and all the states attorney generals covering UDAAP violations of the exact nature we were subjected to. I did not learn about this until the expiration of the settlement process and can not fathom why we would have been excluded other than perhaps deception on XXXXs part. In spite of this" in the "we have been treated very poorly by all owners of this loan. All have been unwilling to work with us and the game plan has seemed to be to keep our credit damaged to eliminate our ability to refinance in order to protect the high rate of interest and to keep generating interest accrual/late fee income. I have long felt that XXXXs actions were inconsistent with the UDAAP and perhaps even the ECOA but we were reluctant to pursue a complaint with the CFPB. Our concern was that if a complaint was unsuccessful" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.