2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: I

Companies starting with I that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

25.6K companies starting with "I"

Showing 23.5K–23.6K of 25.6K

Company Complaints
Invoices 2
Invoices and proof of payments 1
invoices kept being sent out. She acknowledged that it was XXXX error and closed it out 1
invoicesfor all charges. 1
invoke my consumer rights under 12 CFR 1016.7 ( h ) to OPT OUT of all reporting of any Non-Publicly available information and hereby invoke my rights that my OPT OUT is to remain effective until I 2
INVOLUNTARIY AND UNINTENTIONAL. How is it possible to be in agreement/contract with three entities regarding the same vehicle? Proof will be provided. CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS Equal Credit Opportunity Act / Truth in Lending Act Regulation Z Fair Credit Reporting Act / 15 USC 1611 - False & Inaccurate information Fair Debt Collections Practice Act / 15 USC 1692 - Debt collection practices CFPB 1026.23 Right of Rescission ( cancellation ) TD Auto very first correspondence was an attempt to collect a debt and no disclosures were provided. 1
involuntary servitude 2
involve false advertising 1
involved in IDENTICAL criminal law suits 7 ) ZERO awareness by CHASE that the receiving account was already restricted '' by CHASE themselves AND THEN 8 ) CHASE allows the same incorrectly deposited {$20000.00} to be withdrawn from their own restricted '' CHASE account on the same day as the deposit At a total loss for logic at this point 1
involved in the final say when XXXX via AES advertised a co signer release after 24 months of on time payments? When asking AES agent in XX/XX/XXXX ( XXXX 1
INVOLVED.,,EQUIFAX 1
involving the same XXXX XXXX ( XXXX : XXXX ). I have a recording of my claims from an agent at XXXX XXXX that supports this information. 1
involving the same XXXX XXXX ( XXXX : XXXX ). I have a recording of my claims from an agent at XXXX XXXX that supports this information... .I need all information from XXXX XXXX I have spoken with XXXX XXXX XXXX numerous times 1
involving two separate cases 1
involving XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
Io, Inc. 608
Iona was transferred from Nelnet to XXXX. XXXX reported on my credit report : XXXX 1
Iowa 1
IOWA BANKERS MORTGAGE CORPORATION 8
IOWA STUDENT LOAN LIQUIDITY CORPORATION 174
Iowa XXXX Tel : ( XXXX ) XXXX Fax : ( XXXX ) XXXX Online complaints : http : //www.consumerfinance.gov/complaint/ http : //www.consumerfinance.gov/ We also recommend that you contact a HUD-approved housing counselor for assistance with your loan modification. This is a free or low-cost service. A recently released U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development study said that with a counselor 's help 1
Iowa XXXX,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,I.C. System 1
IP 2
IP address 4
IP Address and many more. 1
IP addresses 8
IP logs 2
IP/location match 1
IPAC'S Inc. 207
IPs 1
IQ Data 1
IQ Data International Inc. will not give me the opportunity or will not give me further information and hangs up on me and doesn't even respond as they legally should 1
IQOR US INC 1.8K
iQuantified Management Services, LLC 29
IRC's Center for Economic Opportunity, Inc. 1
ire and frustrations in this whole process.You also have me going through all these disputes 1
Iron Capital Group 4
Irongate Home Finance, LLC 1
IRONICALLY 3
ironically 1
ironically .... 1
ironically Amex waived him the fee. 1
irregularities 1
irrelevant 1
irrelevant responses and even closed my support case on XX/XX/XXXX without resolution. They falsely claimed that I had not submitted my ID 1
irrelevant to my current identity 1
irrespective of its form. 2
irrespective of the inclusion of any photocopy of any related involve 6
irrespective of their reported status. I also request evidence of your verification method 6
irrespective of whether that person is engaged in commerce or meets any other jurisdictional tests under the Federal Trade Commission Act 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter I that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related