2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: H

Companies starting with H that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

2.0K companies starting with "H"

Showing 1.9K–1.9K of 2.0K

Company Complaints
however it is clear that they are able to do as they please 1
however it is still in violation of 15 USC 1666B.,,CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION,MD,20707,,Consent provided,Web,2025-03-03,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,12299661 1
however it prompted me to believe the bank did this to help XXXX XXXX XXXX increase its sales revenue while many customers like myself could end up losing my cash back rewards and the bank benefited from the customers ' loss. I called the bank the next day again 1
however it still has not been. That check that US Bank issued me was returned as rejected after depositing it in my bank account elsewhere. The check that the CFPB stepped in to contact US Bank about 1
however it would need to be confirmed with the bank issuer of the check ( XXXX XXXX ) on Monday/Tuesday. '' So on Monday I call in as a last attempt to see if the check is really bad. But that was not the case. The Chase representative who supposedly specializes in check verification ( loss and prevention team ) tells me that the check is actually good and so the funds were released on Monday XXXX. XX/XX/XXXX. So I continue trying to help this guy get his {$300.00} bike by withdrawing for the amount of {$1500.00} ( which at the time I believed to be his cleared money ) from my Chase bank account. It goes through 1
however it'll take another 10 business days for a possible resolution 1
however making two reports is incorrect on every level. Ditech must remove the late report made in XX/XX/2019 they did not even own the loan and it was paid in full by XXXX XXXX at the time. 1
however my credit report had already been affected at this time. 1
however my direct deposit from the VA still generates interest for your company.,,JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.,FL,344XX,Servicemember,Consent provided,Web,2023-05-16,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,6986436 1
however my payment count was off by at least 12 payments. My payment count was listed as 55 and 53 1
however neither my wife NOR I would have accepted these terms were we told. MrXXXX XXXX then insinuated that I must not have read my disclosure 1
however no response. Few days before that 1
however not realizing at the time of purchase that the sales person added three ( 3 ) ancillary products to the loan to inflate the value and increase their profit. I signed everything electronically and was not provided with a paper contract for review. My total loan for this used XXXX XXXX was $ XXXX. A new XXXX XXXX would have been $ XXXX and $ XXXX with the same high finance charges 1
however only for Unauthorized charges 1
however per a representative from LexisNexis unfortunately the suppression was compromise and it was being reported. Suppression numbers for LexisNexis XXXX & XXXX 1
however PHH called me on XX/XX/XXXX and said they are pausing the foreclosure while they investigate the appeal but if they were me 1
however she can no longer be contacted or fix this issue as promised. She assured me she would fix it. She didn't call back nor would she answer my calls 2
however she could not explain the notable difference from the official rate and the rate that was used. I asked to escalate my complaint and 1
however she was still required to notarize the documents. When XXXX left my home 1
however some issues 1
however statements in XXXX/XXXX stated Our records indicate that you have entered into a Trial Modification Plan 1
however still has not Lastly 1
however stupid dictates!,,CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION,AZ,85022,,Consent provided,Web,2023-03-09,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,6663994 1
however that does convert the loan to conventional. In addition 1
however that is incorrect. 1
however that person was on vacation until XXXX XX/XX/XXXX. To say that I was livid would be an understatement because I had started this process over a month prior and with my finance contingency set to expire 2 days after their call ( which was also the week of XXXX ) 1
however that was sent to an outdated address 1
however the basic functionality is the same. 1
however the business has always been financial stable and pay our bills timely form XX/XX/XXXX until XX/XX/XXXX when the pandemic shut everything down. It is my hope you will consider my plea by removing the negative impact to my personal credit reporting agencies consequently reducing my debt-to-income ratio to less than 30 % 1
however the check remained unprocessed and was never withdrawn from my account Despite my good faith effort to pay on time 1
however the credit card division leaves a lot to be desired. If what I suspect is true 1
however the employees that have answered have all been made aware of this situation that not even I am certain of.,,M.A.R.S. 1
However the payment I made in the XXXX branch on XXXX was used to satisfy that XXXX payment 1
however the refund did not go through. They were not able to disclose the reason the refund was rejected. On XX/XX/22 1
however the remaining two ( 2 ) highest charges they are saying I have to pay 1
however the rep said ( which is the same rep that told me this initially ) I was told these files were housed in a storage that will take a long time to go Through and permission was needed 1
however the tenant subsequently filed for bankruptcy protection and I could only recover a fraction of the debt. This situation resulted in a vacant property requiring repairs and lost rent. 1
however the time and money my husband and I spent 1
however there are other reporting errors. 1
however there are too many departments of Loan Depot 1
however there was a recorded statement saying 1
however there was no identifying information on the check to indicate that this payment was for your account 1
however there was still about {$14000.00} which was negative. I figured they were working the transactions one by one and it would take time. ( See document 8 ) XX/XX/XXXX On XX/XX/XXXX 1
however they answered through a letter ( see attached Citi_denial_letter.pdf ) that : Please note that payment amounts greater than the minimum due are applied to balances with higher APRs before balances with lower rates 1
however they are still reporting it to my consumer report. Reporting this false information is not okay 1
however they continued to add and report an increase in the balance. 3
however they didn't provide me with the requested information. 1
however they fail to do that and only do what is fair and equitable to the furnisher or creditor. Attached below I have submitted all of the paperwork that shows all of the violations on their end. While speaking with Experian today 1
however they fail to do that and only do what is fair and equitable to the furnisher or creditor. Attached below I have submitted all of the paperwork that shows all of the violations on their end. While speaking with XXXX today 2
however they have still not provided any proof of this claim. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter H that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related