2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: A

Companies starting with A that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

29.6K companies starting with "A"

Showing 23.4K–23.4K of 29.6K

Company Complaints
and updat 1
and update all credit reports accordingly.,,ALLY FINANCIAL INC.,TX,75126,,Consent provided,Web,2025-11-17,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,17304718 1
and update all credit reports accordingly.,Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,CCS Financial Services 1
and update my credit report to reflect accurate information.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,TN,38018,,Consent provided,Web,2025-03-11,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,12324878 1
and update my credit report to reflect accurate information.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
and update their records and systems accordingly. But without a valid license this means that XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX is operating as a collections agency in the State of Tennessee illegally and therefore any information provided to Experian by XXXX XXXX XXXX is INVALID. 1
and updated and denied again on XX/XX/XXXX. 1
and updated that information as well. 1
and updated the home with all new everything - appliances 1
and updates are posted and maintained in XX/XX/ on everything but EXPERIAN. 1
and updating documents 1
and updating is considered collection activity. If you verify this inaccuracy from the credit bureaus without giving me all the items listed 1
and upgrades. However 1
and uploaded documentation showing that the five policies are all for the same property. I have spent hours on the phone speaking with their representatives 1
and uploaded it to the Robinhood site. Now I am being told they can not accept a scanned copy of the statement. It must be a PDF statement downloaded off the bank website. I am unable to do that - the account was closed a year ago and I do not have online access to an account that is no longer open. I am unsure why they are asking for information on an account that was closed so long ago 1
and uploaded my insurance coverages. I again informed them I had insurance coverage and request that they lift the coverage they were now charging me for without my consent. On XX/XX/XXXX I received another notice 1
and upon being satisfied that the making of the agreement for arbitration or the failure to comply therewith is not in issue 1
and upon calling 1
and upon consolidation I tried to ensure I was making qualifying payments and was operating under the impression I was based on the information and guidance proved by XXXX XXXX. During these payments 1
and upon opening my TransUnion file I was transferred to a TransUnion Specialized Fraud Team employee 1
and upon realizing XXXX error 1
and upon request for proof they refuse to furnish any 1
and upon talking to XXXX it seems that making it difficult to obtain my records in order to correct the past identity theft 1
and upper-case lower-case combinations and renderings of the trademark and trade name without express written consent {>= $1 3
and UPSTART NETWORK INC. has not given me a reasonable opportunity to opt out of the disclosure before the information was disclosed to multiple nonaffiliated third parties without my consent. 1
and Urban Affairs to expose these deceptive practices. 3
and urgency of the situation 1
and us arising under this Addendum or relating to the Credit Close-UpSM service your waiver of class-action rights limitations on liability to you Your agreement to this Addendum is essential to our agreement to provide the Credit Close-UpSM service to you. If this Addendum is unacceptable to you at any time 2
and US Bank needs to be penalized and investigated 1
and US Bank reaps significant unmerited income. 1
and US Bank refused to rectify any errors on a number of items 1
and US DEPT ED XXXX Date opened XX/XX/XXXX Balance {$0.00} XXXX 1
and US FEDERAL LAW by permitting repetitive 1
and us keep calling you to check why the checked was picked up by you in XXXX Ohio and signed by XXXX XXXX 1
and US mail addressed to me 1
and us to prove this point. 1
and USAA refused 1
and USAA seemed like golden opportunities to earning more money. With an outstanding XXXX score of XXXX and an exemplary credit history 1
and USAA should properly investigate instead of lying and saying they investigated. USAA has stated as of XX/XX/XXXX that their XXXX XXXX is Investigating the Credit Balance '' On the account and that because of the bankruptcy they have to investigate with Bankruptcy and compliance the balance in the account before they can send out the funds. They have been investigating for over a month and this is redicules. The letter they send out says 10-20 Business days for a refund check. Everytime I call in this department keeps writing notes they are still investigating the credit balance 1
and use ( including as evidence at trial or in other administrative or judicial proceedings ) such records 8
and use a loop hole in RESPA to steam roll a inherited person out of a legally inherited properties. All the while if you ever file suit against them 1
and use a variety of different numbers. 1
and use it. But the resistance doesnt see to work w/out some connection to the screen. 2
and use of all consumer information 1
and use of consumer credit information 3
and use of consumer information 15
and use of my private information without my consent. Their automated system is failing to provide the required protection written by federal laws. 1
and use the roadside assistance that i pay for 1
and used at these properties in XXXX. 2 police reports have been made 1
and used it to gather pertinent information ( see Exhibit A ). Following this 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter A that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related