Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
XXXX days past due ( orig. {$1300.00} ) XXXX. XXXX closed 3
XXXX days past due as of XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX days previously. As Rushmore Services told us the rest of the paperwork was still being transferred to Rushmore Services LLC 1
XXXX days prior to the reversal 1
XXXX dba Caliber. 1
XXXX dba XXXX 2
XXXX dba XXXX XXXX 2
XXXX DC XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX 3
XXXX decided to close the case 1
XXXX decided to constantly call XXXX XXXX 's house and I every single day ... so many times that in anger in around XX/XX/XXXX she told the representative calling that her daughter XXXX XXXX and please stop calling. In some strange turn of events 1
XXXX decided to double their interest rates and ultimately boost my monthly payments to almost double of what they were pre-pandemic. Also 1
XXXX delay and obstruction tactics have taken various forms with the common result that my loan serviced by SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING 1
XXXX delete the item from XXXX ( XXXX : XXXX? XXXX & XXXX & XXXX & XXXX & XXXX & XXXX ) in accordance with paragraph ( XXXX ) 1
XXXX delete the item from XXXX ( XXXX : XXXX? XXXX & XXXX & XXXX & XXXX & XXXX & XXXX ) in accordance with paragraph ( XXXX ) 2
XXXX delivered via Certified U.S. Postal Mail to SCA Collections 1
XXXX demanded a filing fee that was never disclosed nor billed 1
XXXX denied assistance 1
XXXX denied me a modified loan and demanded the payment in full 1
XXXX denied my refund request through what appears to be an automated system rather than a thorough review by a human representative. 1
XXXX denied receipt and insisted that I should pay 1
XXXX denied the offer was low-balled and did not offer any proof showing so 1
XXXX denies any discretion or authority in the foreclosure process '' and they have stated emphatically directly to us that they have no role in initiating the foreclosure process. We advised XXXX of these facts by way of a letter sent U.S. Priority Mail XXXX. We also filed a response on XX/XX/2016 1
XXXX denies any/all damages to my vehicle and are not paying anything. However 1
XXXX Department 1
XXXX Department & Variety Stores ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquiry : XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX Department of Education instructed MOHELA to make adjusts to ALL affected borrowers accounts by : 1 ) placing them in forbearance until the issue was correct 1
XXXX DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION XXXX 1
XXXX deposits 1
XXXX DEPT OF ED / XXXX Balance : {$0.00} - Date Opened : XXXX. XXXX 1
XXXX DEPTED/XXXX XXXX DEPTED/XXXX XXXX XXXX DEPTED/XXXX 1
XXXX DEPTEDXXXX XXXXXXXX Balance {$0.00} XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX details of the transactions between the website/exchanges are in the attached documents.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Payward Ventures Inc. dba Kraken,IA,515XX,,Consent provided,Web,2023-10-18,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,7658246 1
XXXX did indeed receive my letters 3
XXXX did not authorize XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX 1
XXXX did not cash that check. I then received a notice from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX dated XX/XX/XXXX saying they were trying to collect the non-existent {$720.00} debt. I called XXXX again and spent another hour during which another XXXX employee re-confirmed the same three facts mentioned above. Despite recognizing that I obviously did not owe XXXX any money and that my old ( closed ) XXXX account also had a XXXX balance when it was acquired by XXXX 1
XXXX did not feel obligated to disclose this fact. 1
XXXX did not get back to me. I made numerous follow up calls to XXXX 1
XXXX did not have access because US Bank Corp changed their pricing parameters. XXXX indicated the threshold and price parameters likely changed due to tightening concerns as US Bank prepared to close on their acquisition of Union Bank. Consequently 1
XXXX did not hire XXXX XXXX as a financial advisor as agreed because she was the banker with the largest deposit at her branch. 1
XXXX did not practice any due diligence in an effort to resolve the debt with me directly 1
XXXX did NOT respond. She further stated as of XX/XX/2022 2
XXXX did not want to wait and hung up the phone on me. Right after that 1
XXXX did quote us the amount of {$3800.00} and stated this would bring our account current and covered our next payment coming due on XX/XX/XXXX. She also confirmed that all fees had been waived. We E-mailed XXXX on XXXX and requested that she send an e-mail confirming above stated quote and information 1
XXXX didn't get the person 's name 1
XXXX didnt actually credit my account for the {$780.00} until XXXX XXXX. This meant that the payment was late and I was charged a late fee and had to pay interest on the balance. They were kind enough to reverse the late fee when I called 1
XXXX different amount change daily. Plus the Loan company has been sharing my personal information with friends and family and other companies 1
XXXX different opening dates 2
XXXX different XXXX mile round trips to the XXXX XXXX and the time I spent in the store in XXXX 1
XXXX digits on the back of my card 1
XXXX directed me to not submit the payment 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.