Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

145,512 companies

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response Most Recent
Company Complaints
and deemed accurate. These responses also labeled my disputes as frivolous or claimed that my dispute could not be processed at the time 1
and deemed unverifiable by the creditor 1
and deep mental and emotional distress. I suffer from : Chronic illnesses with incapacitating anxiety and physical flare-ups worsened by stress Medication changes and doctors intervention due to the additional health strain Isolation 1
and deeply frustrating. I am requesting : Immediate application of the wire funds to my account. 1
and deeply insulted. 1
and defamation 2
and Defamation of Character 1
and Defamation of Character ( per se ). 14
and DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER ( per se ). 3
AND DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER ( PER SE ). 1
and Defamation of Character ( per se ). If your offices are able to provide the proper documentation as requested in the following Declaration 1
and Defamation of Character ( per XXXX ). 1
and defamation of character under permissible purpose 15 USC 1681. 1
and defamation of character under permissible purpose 15 USC 1681. I demand that CAINE & WEINER take immediate corrective action to rectify the inaccuracies in my credit report and provide compensation for the damages I have suffered as a result of their actions. If CAINE & WEINER is unwilling to settle this matter 1
and defamation of character under permissible purpose 15 USC 1681. I demand that CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICE take immediate corrective action to rectify the inaccuracies in my credit report and provide compensation for the damages I have suffered as a result of their actions. If CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICE is unwilling to settle this matter 1
and defamation of character under permissible purpose 15 USC 1681. I demand that LVNV FUNDING LLC take immediate corrective action to rectify the inaccuracies in my credit report and provide compensation for the damages I have suffered as a result of their actions. If LVNV FUNDING LLC is unwilling to settle this matter 1
and defamation of character under permissible purpose 15 USC 1681. I demand that MIDLAND CREDIT COLLECTION take immediate corrective action to rectify the inaccuracies in my credit report and provide compensation for the damages I have suffered as a result of their actions. If MIDLAND CREDIT COLLECTION is unwilling to settle this matter 1
and defamation of character under permissible purpose 15 USC 1681. I demand that Portfolio Recovery Associates take immediate corrective action to rectify the inaccuracies in my credit report and provide compensation for the damages I have suffered as a result of their actions. If Portfolio Recovery Associates is unwilling to settle this matter 1
and defamation of character under permissible purpose 15 USC 1681. I demand that Rent Recovery Solutions take immediate corrective action to rectify the inaccuracies in my credit report and provide compensation for the damages I have suffered as a result of their actions. If Rent Recovery Solutions is unwilling to settle this matter 1
and Defamation of Character. 54
and defamation of character. 8
and Defamation of Character. ( per se ). 4
and Defamation of Character. ( per see ). 1
and Defamation of Character. ( per XXXX ). 1
and Defamation of Character. If your offices are able to provide the proper documentation as requested in the following Declaration 1
and Defamation of Character. It your office fails to respond to this validation request within 30 days from the date of your receipt 1
and Defamation of Character.,,COLLECTION ASSOCIATES 1
and defamation of character.,,Resurgent Capital Services L.P.,TX,77357,,Consent provided,Web,2024-04-09,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,8735849 1
and defamation This is not a request. This is a legal demand. Either provide legal proof or delete this account. 1
and Default.- No payment records exist for a loan that accrued {$6000.00} in interest.- XXXX claim of payments from XXXX is unsupported by documentation and omits payments made from XXXX. Default Status Without Delinquency- Loan entered default in XXXX with no delinquency date recorded.- Servicers failed to document due diligence prior to default XXXX. Reaffirmation vs. Active Balance- Reaffirmation flags are present across loans.- Calculated Outstanding Principal Balance ( OPB ) is $ XXXX NSLDS still reports {$24000.00} XXXX + {$6000.00} XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 362.518 % lifetime XXXX XXXX XXXX Actual documented usage is 362.52 %.- If canceled semesters were counted 1
and defaulted student loans. Debt collectors can not garnish wages for repayment of consumer debt. 3
and deferment between XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX 3
and deferment options were almost nonexistent. 1
and definitely not a third time and on the same date. 1
and definitely not authorized by me there was another security breach. Through that program any desk applied for me a credit card from XXXX. It was closed within hours after I discovered through emails that it was live virtually that I believe by using a XXXX reader I could initiate it. They also said 1
and delaying urgent dental procedures. 1
and delaying urgent XXXX XXXX 1
and delays cause measurable harm. This is precisely the type of consumer injury the CFPB was created to prevent. 1
and delays return of funds as long as possible. 1
and delays the process unnecessarily. Oh 1
and Delete any and all credit reporting related to this alleged account Failure to comply will result in immediate escalation without further notice. 2
and delete any disputed items as soon as possible. Please send me a letter explaining your findings and actions.,,Adler Wallach & Associates 1
and Delete any information that can not be verified. 1
and delete any unverifiable or obsolete data under FCRA 611 ( a ). 2
AND DELETE IT IMMEDIATELY. 1
and delete or correct any information that is found to be inaccurate 1
and delete or correct any unverifiable or duplicate reporting. 1
and delete or correct information that can not be fully verified. 2
and delete the message. 1
and delete this data has already caused irreparable harm to my financial standing. 3

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.